Palin most polarizing of 2012 crowd (State-run media wants to pick the GOP candidate again)

Yahoo! News ^ | 11/10/2010 | CHARLES BABINGTON

[TheConservativeParty]

If the MSM could be truthful, the title would have been
“Palin Most Likely to Kick Obama’s Ass in 2012 Election”.

[Osage Orange]

Well,...there you go. I forgot that “fact”.

[onyx]

Right away! I’m delighted!
WELCOME!!!!

[VRW Conspirator]

Sarah Palin is the most polarizing of the potential 2012 Republican presidential candidates...

Because of the MSM and the democrat party leadership. But I repeat myself.

She would polarize the country...like Hillary Clinton.

I am not convinced that Sarah Palin is the president we should be looking for (donning asbestos underwear). On perspective, in the shadow of Ronaldus Magnus, she has the principles of a solid conservative and the ability to project those virtues. Granted. I, personally, like her and admire her for her talents and convictions. But I ask, does she have the broad marketable appeal that will overcome the MSM onslaught? The MSM HATES her.

I hope she does not leave the fray. She is more powerful as a king-maker than a...er...queen.

[DoughtyOne]

I didn’t attack anyone. I expressed an opinion and you suggested I leave so the adults could talk.

Take note of who is being attacked. I don’t think it is the Palin people. If someone offers up an opinion, it’s hardly the stuff of shutting down all debate.

What’s the problem with encouraging folks to talk about other candidates? And if you’re under the impression that each candidate is getting the same air time Sarah is, then I think that can stand on it’s own or crumble under the absurdity of it.

[DoughtyOne]

No, I made an error and didn’t catch it. I did notice it later.

[onyx]

She seems to do very well with "those" INDY'S.

RASMUSSEN'S POLL: 52% of Voters Say Their Views Are More Like Palin’s Than Obama’s

Whose views are closer to your own? Palin/Obama

Overall: 52/40

Male: 55/37
Female: 48/43
White: 58/35
Black: 5/87
GOP: 84/9
DEM: 14/81
INDY: 59/27
Conservative: 80/12
Moderate: 28/61
Liberal: 14/85

[ilgipper]

I would love to see the breakdown of how many claimed to be conservative and how many moderate. Also how many of the independents claim to be conservative, moderate and liberal. I find it interesting that independents favor Palin, but moderates strongly favor Obama.

[dforest]

Reminding him of his Dad’s pluck was not an endorsement for President. People chose to make it that way.

Reagan worked very hard for many years to get there.

Michael also went on to say that in the last election we had many try to evoke Reagan and we ended up with McCain.

[jospehm20]

Me neither. I do not want the media to pick our candidate again this election.

[onyx]

Those “MODERATES” didn't want to admit they're libtarda and I think that’s why Rasmussen put them next to last with the liberals.

Rasmussen knows whose he's polling.

It's the INDYS that count.

It was interesting and very uplifting to read the polling and exit polling that showed “seniors” voted GOP for the first time in US Senate races because of Sarah Palin’s warnings about “Obama death panels.” Her words resonate and seniors VOTE. Kelly Ayotte was a huge beneficiary to cite one. FWIW, Mark Kirk was also cited in the same article.

[samtheman]

And if you’re under the impression that each candidate is getting the same air time Sarah is, then I think that can stand on it’s own or crumble under the absurdity of it.

What????

Do you even listen to yourself before you type?

That's unbelievable.

Now you're what? Advocating equal time for all? For all what? All "candidates"?

What does that even mean?

You're not even making any sense anymore.

You're pretending to be reasonable but you are not.

No one asked you to read comments about Palin. No one forced you to.

You can promote anyone you want.

But if you're going to start counting numbers of words and comparing who gets how many... that's beyond crazy.

Which all makes me think... I bet you have someone you're pushing but you're afraid here to say who that someone is so what you do instead is try to pretend there's a problem with people talking too much about Palin and not giving "equal time" to the others.

What "others", Doughty? C'mon. Fess up. Who are YOU in the tank for?

And please, don't try to push your phony brand of "objectivity". You're hiding something. Why not just out yourself? Be honest. Come clean.

[Gator113]

I know full well that I will not be able to convince you to vote for Palin. YOU would have to be the one to convince yourself.

As you continue your search for the perfect man/woman, please keep in mind that even this can present a problem. We will not likely ever find one and even if we did, we would likely nail him to a cross.

[DoughtyOne]

Okay Gator113, then we’ve come to the point that it doesn’t matter what people support. Good luck with that.

[TheConservativeParty]

That reminds me of this little saying:

“I am Sarah Palin”.

Americans are much more like Sarah, than the muslim faker in chief. Oh sure, he knows the islamic prayers, the bowing ettiquette,etc,,,but that doesn’t go over very well with the American people. The Indonesians love it though!

[DoughtyOne]

I have expressed my thoughts on this thread. If you wish to know what they are, read them.

You were the one stating that all the other candidates were being discussed on the forum. One year out without anyone having declared, do you really think we’re giving an honest vetting each of the potentials? I don’t.

You seek to make light of it. Go ahead. If we wait as long again as we waited for this crucial moment (2012) to come around again, it will be 2044 before we have as good a chance at getting a solid Conservative in the White House.

The last time was 1980.

If you think I’m a radical subverter for pushing as best I know how for the best Conservative mind to win, then so be it.

Imagine this terrible hidden agenda, wanting the best Conservative person, the most well grounded to win the nomination. Oh the tender mercies...

[Gator113]

Not at all. I have no idea where you got that out of what I said, unless you’re looking for a reason for a debate. Frankly, it looks like you already have your hands full with that. LOL

[Osage Orange]

I know you did.....

I was just jacking with you....

I've been on that end...more than once.

FRegards,

[DoughtyOne]

I mentioned three valid concerns and you reduced that to my being too narrow in my focus. Gator113, either we believe in Conservatism or we don’t.

Why are we here discussing this, if it doesn’t really matter if the McCain agenda is what it is? If our next nominee can sign on to it, why not just have McCain?

This doesn’t make sense to you? We shouldn’t want to avoid this?

[onyx]

Michael Reagan: Sarah Palin Too Polarizing To Be Elected President

Watch the interview for yourself! It's not quite as described....lol. Bear in mind, that Michael Reagan was not only at the NewsMax meeting with Sarah Palin and Christopher Ruddy, and that he also wrote the the article "WLECOME BACK, DAD.

Michael is a good guy, but he's just handwriing ahead of time. He likes Sarah Palin a lot. I think he believes the Huckster and Romney look like the winners to him and he's wrong about that, We've already seen them and there's nothing new new to see. Only more baggage from each.

Sarah Palin has the Tea Party Republican Partiots and a huge grasroots organization that's ready to roll for her. You watch, the money will all go to Sarah Palin.

She is serious Sarah now. Talkinfg monetary policy and garnering accolades from the big money giants who matter. They have come to realize that she's one smart cookie. Sarh took on Bernanke and she's right. Several kudos from the likes of Paul Gigot, Stuart Varney, Peter Shiff and

POLARIZE THIS!