Posted on 11/10/2010 3:56:26 PM PST by wagglebee
The interview takes place at an abortion center where Stacy Cutler watches the image of her viable late-term unborn child on an ultrasound monitor.
“Cutler listens to her 22-week-old unborn child’s heartbeat – and her eyes fill with tears,” the Sun reports. “The grainy scan shows the fully developed foetus moving around inside her. But Stacy’s tears are not of joy at seeing her baby for the first time. She has made the heartbreaking decision to have an abortion at this late stage.”
Repeat abortions have long been a problem in England, where thousands of women have had three or more.
Cutler says she had the abortions because she was not emotionally secure enough to have the baby and, despite the multitude of resources, not financially able to do so.
“It was certainly not an easy decision to abort four of my unborn children,” she told the newspaper. “But I realised that it would be unfair to bring those children in to the world when I barely had the money to look after my son.”
Cutler resorted to using abortion as a form of birth control even though she was on the pill each of the four times in which she became pregnant.
She is of the mindset many women who justify their abortions and abortion advocacy groups have about abortion being better than giving birth to a baby in less-than-stellar conditions.
“Women who choose to have an abortion are criticised and looked down on,” she todl the Sun. “But it is far better than bringing a child into the world that you are unable to look after or afford. Obviously I’m not proud of what I have done and I know people will judge me. Abortion should be the decision of the woman who is having the baby – no one else.”
Josephine Quintavalle of the Prolife Alliance commented on Cutler’s story in her own comments to The Sun.
“Stacy’s story is horrifying and it is the reality of the abortion-on-demand state we are living in,” she explained. “As part of the ProLife Alliance, I am anti-abortion and her choice is just incomprehensible to me.”
The pro-life advocate said Cutler should have consdiered adoption and the abortion practitioner used an excuse for the abortion that essentially allowed it to be used as birth control.
“For a woman to choose to terminate a healthy baby that was nearly 22 weeks simply because she realised she didn’t want it is beyond belief. Babies can and have been known to live from 23 weeks. I cannot understand why she could not go full term and give the child up for adoption,” she added.
“The doctor clearly felt that it was in the interest of her mental health but, if that is the case, this should certainly be looked at more thoroughly,” she said.
I’m not a life coach or anything, but this woman may have issues.
Why doesn’t this dummy get her tubes tied?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
KEEP. YOUR. LEGS. CLOSED.
Problem solved.
}:-)4
She’s going to be a prime candidate for getting ovarian cancer down the road.
What about the 22 week old baby?
He doesn't have a say?
What if her mother had aborted her.
She wouldn't have wanted a say in that?
I. Am. Speechless.
Any word on Daddy??
Let me guess, she lives in a “council” flat and is on the dole. Probably has been most of her life.
How close am I?
“Why doesn’t this dummy get her tubes tied?”
Should get her knees tied . . . she has deliberately paid to have someone murder 4 of her children and she walks free . . . so does the murderer . . . all because we use “words” instead of moral law. She’s a disgusting piece of garbage . . . no less, she’s a murderess.
Huh? But you're not "having the baby" are you, dear?
Demographic suicide.. more efficient than eating a bullet..
My sentiments exactly. Tie the twerp’s tubes. She is obviously unmarried and already has a son who is probably being supported by tax-payers.
The sperm donors need to take more precautions or understand that the children they leave behind in random wombs are being murdered - regularly.
Promiscuous women are becoming genocidal maniacs. I don’t buy her ‘tears’ - she cries for herself, no-one else.
Are there no veterinarians available to spay these women?!
But but but you know, saying all of this with a British accent makes it all sound so much more “intelligent”.
murder
That 22-year-old British woman needs to learn to keep herself out of the sack.
She's going to be crying even more tears come Judgment Day.
Well maybe she had one to many and it won’t be an issue any more.
This is what marxism is about. We MUST end it now before it comes to America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.