Posted on 11/29/2010 5:27:05 AM PST by justlurking
Facebook has just announced that George W. Bush is going to be present tomorrow November 29th to answer questions about his new book Decision Points. The discussion will happen on Facebook Live at 2PM PST.
It is unclear whether Mark Zuckerberg will be attending the Q&A but its likely. I can only assume that Facebook is the platform for this discussion because of the sheer number of members Bush can reach at one time. There is no mention of who will interview the president and how long it will take but I am sure more information will develop as we get closer to the time frame of the interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at tekgoblin.com ...
I don’t do facebook-—but this should be interesting. I’m reading his book right now, and enjoying it.
Ask him if he hopes Agenda 21 and Amnesty for Illegals are implemented during the Obama administration, before the Tea Party gets more powerful.
No more Bush Rinos.
Going through the chapter on 9/11, I teared up more than once. Reading the book just brought back memories I had forgotten. We were so lucky to have President Bush at that time in history!
...zzzzzz....
No more Bush Rinos.
Bump.
“Ask him if he hopes Agenda 21 and Amnesty for Illegals are implemented during the Obama administration, before the Tea Party gets more powerful.
No more Bush Rinos.”
Ignorance...how some are so proud of it.
Yep.
Bush set the table.
000bbb served the meal.
The major problem I have with Bush (whom I voted-for twice) is that, Bush ‘checked out’ of the Presidency in 2005 (after winning re-election in 2004). Proof:
- he did not take the Iraq insurgency seriously to increase troop levels, leaving a wake of GI deaths that by 2006 we lost Congress over the war issue.
- he did not manage/control/attack the financial situation BEFORE it wound up being a crisis in 2007/8, leaving a WIDE GAPING HOLE for Obama to jump through.
- he TELLS the country in AUG/SEP 2008 that we have a “financial crisis” that requires IMMEDIATE BAILOUTS to BANKS and AUTOMAKERS, opening the door wide open for the in-coming RATs to raid the people’s treasury to unbelievable proportions.
- and I don’t even want to get into Illegals/Open Borders/Amnesty, and a Bloated Government.
Ad hominem is the sign of a failed argument (which is ironic, since the charge is “ignorance”).
Mr. President: Did you agree with your wife when she called opposition to the nomination of Harriet Meirs sexist?
It’s going to be fun watching the last vestiges of Bush lovers here on FR continue to hold this man up on a pedestal. If Bush had only remained neutral instead of swinging left on financial and social issues we wouldn’t have Obama.
Apparently you don't have much going on in your lives that you hang on to this irrational emotion against a fine man who did the best he could, asking God daily for help, and leading us with strength.
You know, ray, it IS possible to disagree with policy and still not hate the man.
btw, your premise that Bush led us to Obama is highly flawed and not backed up by historical fact.
Unfortunately I have to miss it, but I expect a full report.
He and Paulson went around clucking like chickens that "subprime was contained." Doesn't that count?
And W's tiny amount of vetoes during eight years is worth mentioning.
Gee, I remember him trying to privatize social security and being ignored by actual RINOs.
Do you EVER post to someone who disagrees with you about Bush WITHOUT a strawman or hyperbole?
Oh, yes it is. You just don't want to believe it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.