Next step for tight security could be trains, boats, metro

The Hill ^ | 11/23/10 02:09 PM ET | Jordy Yager

[TheGoodBoy]

The next step in tightened security could be on U.S. public transportation, trains and boats.

[Hatteras]

I’ll go with “tagged” for $200, Alex.

[Cboldt]

And after those modes of transportation are covered under the government’s “security umbrella,” will come security checks for those choosing to transport via car, motorcycle, moped, scooter, or bicycle.

[hal ogen]

Walking is next. Then skipping...maybe strolling.

[struggle]

The next step could be entrances to malls, restaurants...

[MaryFromMichigan]

Yes, and all in the name of keeping us safer.
Wide open borders.
Millions of illegal aliens.
What a farce.

[BCW]

If Obama and his elite crew had their way - and they are trying hard to get it - yes - they would milk us and decide who could have babies and who could not...becuase they know best!

[boomop1]

This is big pay off for Obama’s big bud and owner.

[MosesKnows]

Next step for tight security could be trains, boats, metro

Perhaps if they devoted more effort controlling our borders there would be less need to tighten security on trains, boats, and metros.

[1_Rain_Drop]

"yes - they would milk us and decide who could have babies and who could not...becuase they know best!"

...oh and they would tell us when to have babies, and what gender... and then what color eyes are allowed....

[Jack Black]

This idea is stuck in a New York state of mind. In NY the sheeple are comprehensively disarmed. In much of the rest of the USA concealed carry permits are the norm.

It is *not* against the law to take a public bus while carrying in many states. So, what's the TSA going to do when they find strapped passengers? Check their papers and let them go I guess? (And does the TSA even have the power of purely local modes of transport like this?)

[zeugma]

Well, if you don’t want to be groped, you can always walk!

[Old_Grouch]

OK, I guess that makes some sense.