Skip to comments.
Obama and GOPers Worked Together to Kill Bush Torture Probe
Mother Jones ^
| December 1 2010
| David Corn
Posted on 12/01/2010 8:03:33 PM PST by GlockThe Vote
Edited on 12/02/2010 2:46:31 AM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
NewsletterShare Close this Share Box154 Comments | Post Comment.Wed Dec. 1, 2010 2:47 PM PST In its first months in office, the Obama administration sought to protect Bush administration officials facing criminal investigation overseas for their involvement in establishing policies the that governed interrogations of detained terrorist suspects. A "confidential" April 17, 2009, cable sent from the US embassy in Madrid to the State Department
(Excerpt) Read more at motherjones.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 200904; 20090401; 20090417; adsp; baltasargarzon; bho44; bleedingheartattack; bush43; condepumpido; conspiracy; corn; davidcorn; garzon; javierzaragoza; johnyoo; motherjones; revisionism; spain; torture; torturememe; yoo; zaragoza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
wow
To: GlockThe Vote
jury is still out, for me. obamanation doesn’t do anything, ANYTHING, to protect Americans...no matter who they are.
2
posted on
12/01/2010 8:05:10 PM PST
by
bareford101
(For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
To: GlockThe Vote
Now we know why George W has not said a word against Obama.
Wow, just wow!!!!!
3
posted on
12/01/2010 8:05:20 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: bareford101
Yeah, but this now explains why W has been so silent on Obama.
Makes perfect sense now.
4
posted on
12/01/2010 8:06:21 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: GlockThe Vote
There’s no wow. Why are we still in Iraq, when he would pull out if he could?
Same reason. Buma’s not in total charge.
To: GlockThe Vote
Did you read the comments at that site? The moonbats aren’t very please with their lightworker.
6
posted on
12/01/2010 8:09:12 PM PST
by
rdl6989
(January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
To: GlockThe Vote
neither of the Bushes blasted current presidents... it doesn’t pay nor does it show any kind of class..... and they are smart enough to know that. Clinton is also careful about what he says.... obamanation has continually been a shift the blame person his entire life.
I don’t trust Mother Jones. Actually, I am to the point of not trusting anyone I do not know personally without research. It’s just part of trying to get to the Truth and live a truth-filled life (for me).
7
posted on
12/01/2010 8:09:35 PM PST
by
bareford101
(For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
To: GlockThe Vote
W was always silent about everything. He doesn’t know any other way. He wouldn’t have bitched about the new guy whoever he was.
To: Christian Engineer Mass
Yes this is wow - because now we know W was silent on Obama because they saved his butt from prosecution, it never had anything to do with being classy or the other pap fed to the public.
9
posted on
12/01/2010 8:10:14 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: GlockThe Vote
To: GlockThe Vote
saved his butt from prosecution? From nutty leftoid Spain? Who gives an * about them?!!!
To: GlockThe Vote
I couldn’t disagree with you more... but, I see that your mind won’t be changed as far as the Bushes are concerned anymore than mine... let’s agree to disagree.... I do agree on a lot of other things you agree on :)
12
posted on
12/01/2010 8:13:35 PM PST
by
bareford101
(For me, there is no difference in a tolerant, open mind and a cess pool. Both are open to filth.)
To: GlockThe Vote
To: rdl6989
Complete meltdown at DU, HP, and that site right now. Some of them are almost in tears.
This wikileaks thing is going to be the biggest story of our time bar none.
14
posted on
12/01/2010 8:13:53 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: Lancey Howard
15
posted on
12/01/2010 8:15:05 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: rdl6989
16
posted on
12/01/2010 8:16:01 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: GlockThe Vote
Yes this is wow - because now we know W was silent on Obama because they saved his butt from prosecutionLOL! Yeah... Bush was worried about being prosecuted in Spain...
Didn't your mother tell you too much LSD is bad for you?
To: Lancey Howard
18
posted on
12/01/2010 8:20:33 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
To: GlockThe Vote
If President Bush could be tried “by other countries” for war crimes, I think Obama knows anything he does wrong, opens the door for them to come after him. Obama realizes these other countries don't just hate Bush, they hate America and allowing Bush to be tried will put him in peril as well as future presidents. (Conservatives have been saying this all along)
To: Linda Frances
20
posted on
12/01/2010 8:27:52 PM PST
by
GlockThe Vote
(Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
