Article, then # 7 , # 8.
[Thanks, Seizethecarp.]
“Obama Eligibility Case Before The Ninth Circuit Court: Barnett v. Obama NO. 09-56827” includes this quote United States Justice Foundation Executive Director Gary Kreep made to World Net Daily: “According to case law, candidates have standing to challenge the eligibility of other candidates. The Department of Justice, which is handling Obama’s defense, is not even addressing standing. They're saying it's a political question and therefore shouldn't be decided by the courts.”
While naysayers assign a near zero chance of success for Kreep’s case (that would include virtually every FReeper who claims to be an attorney IIRC), my understanding as an admitted non-lawyer is that SCOTUS sometimes “waits” for the “right” case to come along for them to make a controversial ruling.
SCOTUS knows that Kreep’s case with Keyes is working its way up the appeals process. Unlike Apuzzo’s case which was based primarily on speculation that Kerchner might at some time in the future be harmed in the future by an unlawful CIC, Keyes was actually harmed by running against and losing to Obama, arguable a non-NBC dual citizan and claimed by numerous Kenyans to have been born in Kenya.
So when the Keyes/Kreep case reaches SCOTUS, the NBC issue and the right of Keyes to request discovery of the HI vital records issue could actually come before SCOTUS for the first time.
The NBC aspect of Apuzzo’s case was never “reached” by SCOTUS because standing was never allowed by it or by any of the federal courts. Thus the definition of NBC has never been litigated on the merits. In my understanding a failure to accept standing for Apuzzo’s client was not an affirmation by SCOTUS that Obama is an NBC. SCOTUS simply affirmed the lower courts’ rulings that Kerchner lacked standing.
Article, then # 7 , # 8.
[Thanks, Seizethecarp.]
Looks like you agree on what I have been saying for over a year. 0b0z0 won't dare run for '12, precisely because of this!
If one naturalized citizen runs for POTUS in '12, gets thrown out off the ballot as s/he should, sues for leveling the playing field and demanding that ALL candidates prove beyond ANY forensic doubt that they're NBC, that "injured" naturalized citizen will have the elusive "STANDING" to courts taking up the case.
If 0b0z0 is thrown out of ONE SINGLE ballot by a SoS, even in a red state that he'll definitely lose, HE'S TOAST!
I still believe that 0commie won't run because he couldn't possibly take the consequences of rejection of the usurping narcissi POS. He could do something to himself as a result!
However, narcissism isn't a personal disorder per the well-paid psychiatric commission concluded! Yeah right, LOL!
These attorney FReepers have a pretty good track record so far. Yet they're still dismissed as trolls and o-bots for successfully predicting the outcome --and in most cases explaining exactly why these birther lawsuits have been and will be doomed to failure.