Posted on 12/02/2010 2:02:35 PM PST by bigbob
Although the U.S. Defense Department and North American Aerospace Defense Command have speculated publicly that the unidentified contrail of a projectile soaring into the skies off the California coast – and recorded by a KCBS television crew – came from a jet and posed no security threat to the U.S., several experts are raising provocative and disturbing questions about the government's official response, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
Two governmental military experts with extensive experience working with missiles and computer security systems have examined the television video and conclude the mysterious contrail originating some 30 miles off the coast near Los Angeles did not come from a jet – but rather, they say the exhaust and the billowing plume emanated from a single source nozzle of a missile, probably made in China.
(Farah is the founder of WorldNet Daily)
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Yeah, I'm one of them, too.
Except that I've seen ICBM launches from Vandenberg AFB in person and I saw this one and Tuesday's contrail in person, as well.
It was a jet.
If you'd rather (pun intended) believe SeeBS News on this one, go right ahead.
Uh, a NORAD General said it was, without a doubt, a missile. Jane’s is often wrong.
You’re really out there.
Did he see it in person like me, or did he just watch the SeeBS News video?
The Norad general and Jane’s were initially wrong. At least Jane’s had the guts to correct themselves. If that general just saw the same video we all did without any other information, I don’t care what he said.
If he has inside info, then he’s violating secrecy and needs to be prosecuted.
Freepers bash and mods ban opinions that must not be mentioned.
It has been obvious that FR is compromised for some time.
Nice work actually documenting the phenomenon.
I've got one. How come your very first post on the subject, Nov. 10, stated: Someone launched a missile. No one is admitting it. Let it go.
And then your handful of posts on the subject since then, you definitely state that it WASN'T a missile?
I hate to say it, but that second video doesn’t in the slightest bit resemble the first. In fact, it’s not a video, it’s game playing with a still photo, as far as I can tell.
Not so. The bulk of the FReepers who've watch missile launches think it was a jet.
This was a warning after they disabled the Cruise Ship with a new EMP weapon.
If this were a Chinese missle, now what? How does this affect our lives going forward?
*ahem*
Go ask a professional sea-farer that distance. A guy who's made his living fishing on boats at sea, going a couple hundred miles offshore for ... oh, 40 years. Ask him how far he can see before a boat with a superstructore of, say, 12 feet, can't be seen because it's below the horizon.
Go ahead -- do it. I have. :^)
It's how I know for certain sure that you are full of sh*t.
Janes is merely relying on the DOD which alludes to John Pike. Pike is a known Communist Agit-Prop LIAR about national defense needs. He was always against SDI, against the MX, against the B-1, against the Trident, against the F-22, against U.S. built air tankers, against Ronald Reagan and his defense buildup...and for the nuclear freeze, which was a Soviet-orchestrated ploy to insure their nuclear war-winning monopoly was frozen into perpetuity.
Pike was the first to come out screaming it was a jet.
CNN backed him up.
Now Janes.
Three strikes, and they are out.
People who live right there with wonderful views got other camera images of the spiraling missile exhaust contrail...and said flat out they thought it was a Vandenburg missile launch contrail...and despite living there for decades, seeing countless thousands of jet contrails, had neve, ever, seen a jet contrail there like this..
Not so. Actually, the bulk of Freeper missile experts such as myself, believe it was a missile.
Even the part filmed from the moving car?
I will not try to offer any more on this. If you wish to believe Monday's contrail was a Chinese missile launched from a sub off the shore of California, then so be it.
FRegards,
You’re right about Ol Dan, I’m afraid, I seem to remember him being on the wrong side of a number of national defense issues in the past, but it has been too long for me to detail them all.
You’re right about Ol Dan, I’m afraid, I seem to remember him being on the wrong side of a number of national defense issues in the past, but it has been too long for me to detail them all.
Not so. Actually, the bulk of Freeper missile experts believe it was a jet.
Yeah, you got me.
Please ping me the next time you see unadulterated truth from SeeBS News. Say hi to Dan Rather for me when you see him, too. LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.