Posted on 12/08/2010 7:52:40 AM PST by Qbert
How about all estates paying the same rate as Ted Kennedy’s estate pays? I remember the YouTube video of someone cornering him and asking about all his family trusts. Classic.
The estate tax provision was never on anyone’s radar screen. It was thrown in SOLELY to provide something to negotiate away and get votes.
This is all silliness. Just refuse any and all DEBT CEILING INCREASES and the problems explode short term and are solved long term.
However, if the House Dems balk at it..it give the House GOP the excuse to walk away fromt he deal..which they will do..
Proving yet again that “bipartsanship” to Democrats is a 70/30 deal in their favor.
Maybe it’s time to say “screw it” and pull R support and let Obama carry his own water with his own party. I don know...keeping the Bush tax rates is the right thing for American families, but not at ANY cost.
We should be getting MORE not less out of this deal.
what makes Government think it is so entitled?
I really believe the republicans just threw OZERO a life line....There was to be NO compromise, and they failed to heed the voice of the people. If the pubs would have kept their promise, OFOOL and the RATS would have sunk quicker than the titanic in the ocean of public approval! The snake grew another head and this one is going to be extremely dangerous with the help of the mediaWHORES of course! I for one am very disappointed! Forget men for they shall fail you, BUT God will always be there...”KEEP YOUR EYES SOLELY FOCUSED ON THE LORD AT ALL TIMES”!
No deal if any changes.
Wait to January when we have power.
Plank #3 of the Communist Manifesto.
Elimination of all rights of inheritance.
Classic. This is simply a ‘jobs’ bill for estate attorneys/planners and life insurance salesman.
Buffett/Gates crowd will not pay ANY inheritance taxes I bet.
“No deal if any changes.
Wait to January when we have power.”
Agree.
Plus, that way, it would be the GOP that tried to be “bi-partisan” (for those who are concerned with that word- whatever it really means...), and work with the president on the original compromise proposal, but the hyper-partisan Dems in Congress ruined it.
I still think it was “magical” that when the mother, Rose, died, she was a full-time Florida resident, even though she didn't leave the state of Massholechusetts for at least the last 10 years of her life.
I know snowbirds who make damn sure they aren't in this state more than 182 days a year just so they don't “qualify” as MA residents: that means a slew of taxes, RomneyCare requirements, etc. kick in.
But then, laws and taxes are for the little people.
Yeah, because not confiscating assets from dead people would cost the government money.
Democrats: Not happy until they get the quarters off the dead man’s eyes.
Well, whatever they’re going to do..or not do, they have on or about the 15th to get it done before the market biggies and even little people start selling off assets ahead of tax season.
I’m inclined to say the Hell with it and go home for the holidays if Dems don’t take this deal as is. This is a take it or leave it. If Pelosi and her crowd want to pull a scorced Earth trick, let them. And let them hang in the next session.
And absolutely NO negotiating on DREAM, START or any othe package until the next Congress is in session.
I have never won anything but peanut money from a lottery. However it has always bugged me as to by what rights does the government have to take someones winnings which the government had no part in except by the wildest of social stretching? The point being that government should never extract from persons that for which the person did not get government services.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.