Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Singapore interested in ex-US Navy P-3s
Flight Global ^ | 12/15/2010 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 12/16/2010 9:07:50 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

Singapore has shown an interest in possibly acquiring several of the US Navy's surplus P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft, according to the type's former manufacturer, Lockheed Martin.

"They have issued a letter of request to look at P-3s," says Mark Jarvis, Lockheed's director, design and production for P-3 programmes. Singapore's interest could be for around four or five aircraft, he believes, with these to perhaps draw on the configuration of the 12 secondhand Orions due to be delivered to Taiwan from 2012.

Singapore - which currently operates five Fokker 50 maritime patrol aircraft - could potentially acquire surplus Orions as the US Navy begins to transition to its replacement, the Boeing 737-based P-8A Poseidon. Jarvis says the service could fly some of its aircraft to Lockheed's Greenville site in South Carolina to undergo overhaul and modernisation prior to their future delivery to third parties

(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; navair; p3; singapore; usnavy

1 posted on 12/16/2010 9:07:54 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I’d love one.


2 posted on 12/16/2010 9:11:22 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I thought those old birds have been beat to hell with low level work. Structural issues, I read about some time back. Fine aircraft and a great ASW platform, but metal can only take so much abuse.


3 posted on 12/16/2010 9:14:49 PM PST by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Singapore wants proven ASW capabilities to counter-balance the two Scorpene submarines Malaysia recently purchased.


4 posted on 12/16/2010 9:18:55 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Hmmm..... Me thinks the Singaporeans have an eye on China. And they may be a tad worried about Chinese subs. They need
to be looking at some other stuff also. Some stuff that can go mucho faster than a P-3.


5 posted on 12/16/2010 9:20:15 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I don’t like the P-3’s so much. If they got a few super Connies, I might apply to work there.


6 posted on 12/16/2010 9:24:30 PM PST by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

I’m an old P-3 sailor and I’m not real comfortable with this.


7 posted on 12/16/2010 9:49:36 PM PST by DustyMoment (Go green - recycle Congress in 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Why?


8 posted on 12/16/2010 9:54:15 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Several reasons. One is sentimentality. But, well beyond that is the airworthiness of the aircraft. The P-3 is over 50 years old and has had the crap beaten out of them. And, the Chinese don’t need to force anymore P-3s to land in China.

As things stand today, there are so few P-3s still on active duty that they have all been assigned to the Fleet Air Wings, not the sqaudrons. The replacement P-8 is too expensive for the Navy to be able to purchase enough to replace their geriatric P-3s. I dearly love the P-3 and have very fond memories of them but, let’s be honest, they have earned their rest and should be retired with the dignity they earned.


9 posted on 12/16/2010 10:02:24 PM PST by DustyMoment (Go green - recycle Congress in 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

You have some very good points


10 posted on 12/16/2010 10:04:29 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: magslinger

ping


11 posted on 12/16/2010 11:35:02 PM PST by Vroomfondel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Earned their rest? They are machines. If they have residual
value to our friends in Sg, better that they be used to tie
up and observe Chinese while we sneak in unnoticed.

Get those planes reworked and sold!


12 posted on 12/16/2010 11:43:56 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Vroomfondel; SC Swamp Fox; Fred Hayek; NY Attitude; P3_Acoustic; investigateworld; lowbuck; ...
SONOBUOY PING!

Click on pic for past Navair pings.

Post or FReepmail me if you wish to be enlisted in or discharged from the Navair Pinglist.
The only requirement for inclusion in the Navair Pinglist is an interest in Naval Aviation.
This is a medium to low volume pinglist.

13 posted on 12/17/2010 1:38:43 PM PST by magslinger (Samuel Colt, feminist. Making women equal to men for over 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErnstStavroBlofeld

Taiwan should be snapping these up like turtle nuts.


14 posted on 12/17/2010 9:24:58 PM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus - Domari Nolo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

The P-3 may be a machine, but it is a highly developed machine that is regularly subjected to physical stresses of nature that ultimately has deleterious effects on the metal structure and skin of the aircraft. In addition, let’s recall the history of the P-3 - it is the military version of the Lockheed Electra which, in the late 50s and early 60s, became notorious for pulling their wings off (while in flight) because the wing root was underdesigned for the engines.

The P-3 and the C-130 are the same vintage aircraft and share many design similarities. As I said, I dearly love this aircraft, but it is pretty old. Would you want to put a Model-T on the road and expect it to perform at today’s levels.

It’s an old aircraft and it should be retired before its age causes more deaths.


15 posted on 12/22/2010 11:47:28 PM PST by DustyMoment (Go green - recycle Congress in 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson