Skip to comments.
What's wrong with No Labels?
The New Republic ^
| 12/16/10
| E.J. Dionne Jr.
Posted on 12/17/2010 5:47:16 AM PST by randita
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Indeed, there is no far left to speak of anymore.
1
posted on
12/17/2010 5:47:19 AM PST
by
randita
To: randita
LOLOL.......so what are they going to do........change their names and join up incognito?
All we have to do is see eeeeejjjjjjjjDionne and we KNOW!!!
2
posted on
12/17/2010 5:49:20 AM PST
by
Carley
(ISRAEL.......NOT SO ALONE!!!)
To: randita
It's labelist...
(I.e., absurd...)
3
posted on
12/17/2010 5:50:35 AM PST
by
LRS
("This is silly! It can't be! It can't be!!" "Oh yes it is! I said you wouldn't know the joint.")
To: randita
....it sprang up AFTER commielibs got roughed up on NOV2nd...like ACORN a different name,but agenda the same.
4
posted on
12/17/2010 5:50:40 AM PST
by
Doogle
((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: randita
Marxist Communist Socialist Progressive Fascist Liberal Democrat Progressive No-Label
We see what you're doing here.
To: randita
A brief history of rebranding: Communist
Socialist
Democrat
Liberal
Progressive
No Label
la plus ca change
6
posted on
12/17/2010 5:53:43 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
To: randita
7
posted on
12/17/2010 5:54:49 AM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: randita
...insisting that the New Deal represented an unconstitutional power grab,...It was. The courts said so. Roosevelt then threatened to pack the USSC to get his way.
8
posted on
12/17/2010 5:56:42 AM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: randita
These goons are just one more tentacle the socialist octopus. The only Thing new here is that they aren’t fooling anyone now.
9
posted on
12/17/2010 5:58:10 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: randita
Self proclaiming oneself as a moderate is no different than saying “I’m the one who’s always right.”
10
posted on
12/17/2010 5:59:10 AM PST
by
fruser1
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I like it. I just add marxist & national socialist to that list.
Communist
Marxist
Socialist
National Socialist
Democrat
Liberal
Progressive No-Label
11
posted on
12/17/2010 5:59:20 AM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: facedown
"...The truth is that the American right is much farther from anything that can fairly be described as "the center" than is the left...."Stopped reading right there. This is a flat-out lie.
To: randita
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a Choice." A group by any other name is still a group.
To: randita
E.J.Dionne...just as irrelevant as ever! The left is mainstream, the right is extremist and now that conservatives are asserting themselves again the primary call of DIonne and his ilk is for bipartisanship!
14
posted on
12/17/2010 6:04:06 AM PST
by
pgkdan
(Protect and Defend America! End the practice of islam on our shores before it's too late!)
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
” No Labels “ as in ? nothing to see here folks, now move along or you will see your self on the Russian front.
To: Carley
What’s wrong with No Labels?
Duh! It’s a Label! They walk among us.
I’d embrace “practical solutions” if they ever came up with any. Fact-based discussions will demonstrate the unconstitutionality of ObamaCare, the New Deal power grab, and reveal the ponzi Social Security scheme. But can this group even grasp the truth?
It would be funny if it weren’t so frightening.
To: randita
What’s wrong with “No Labels”?
For one thing, that it’s attractive to a leftie weenie like E. J. Dionne.
17
posted on
12/17/2010 6:08:54 AM PST
by
Stosh
To: randita
“Indeed, there is no far left to speak of anymore. Even among socialistsI’m talking about real onesalmost all now acknowledge the benefits of markets, no longer propose state ownership of the means of production, and accept the inevitability of inequalities in wealth and income.”....
WTF????? Pelosi/Reid/O bought the Banks the Unions and GM, tried to raise taxes and want to tax the rich because “they don’t need the money”!!
18
posted on
12/17/2010 6:10:49 AM PST
by
jrl1
To: ClearCase_guy
Meanwhile, those of us with an ideology NOT abhorrent to most decent human beings DON’T change what we’re called.
19
posted on
12/17/2010 6:11:03 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: randita
OUTSTANDING thread! Thanks to every poster.
The tactics of totalitarians.
“Everything about socialism is sham and affectation.” - 23.11 Ch23 Evil; Economic Harmonies; Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850
20
posted on
12/17/2010 6:12:00 AM PST
by
PGalt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson