Posted on 12/27/2010 2:46:36 PM PST by Racehorse
So you believe cold blooded murderers are telling the truth when they make excuses for why they kill someone do you?
You don’t think that maybe the murderers might have lied about why they killed Gebler do you?
Again I refer you to Article 3, Section 2 of the US Constitution, it’s all about the right to a fair trial. There’s a reason why the US Founding Fathers wrote that you know, it’s because they knew there were so many boneheads out there who don’t understand the meaning of justice and liberty, you’ll find many such boneheads post here.
Potato head could be the wrong name for you. LMAO
I’m not religious and 99% of adult humans are worthless rodents. So I don’t care for your opinion. Sorry.
You cared enough to reply to me twice, only when I whupped your ass and showed how utterly wrong you were did you get all prissy.
A wimp as well as a bonehead, the usual characteristics of blowhard keyboard warriors I have found.
The guy was most likely guilty based on the circumstances in this article. We make guesses on FR. If you don’t like it then go to a different site. Perhaps DU or DailyKos would be more to your liking. I hear they are still complaining about Gitmo.
“The guy was most likely guilty based on the circumstances in this article.”
Bullshit!
I read the article and found not a single shred of evidence of Mark Gebler’s guilt. The only criminals I could see were the murdering scum that killed a man in cold blood and then decided to lie about it. You take the side of the criminal scum, that’s your choice, but please spare me the righteous moralising you use to cover up plain cold blooded murder.
You sir are at the wrong website, it is FreeRepublic that upholds the US Constitution, only lefties believe in mob murder, secret execution, death by acclamation and the abolition of constitutional rights and freedoms.
I suggest you should join the ranks of your Commie fellow travellers and leave here where people respect the concept of the rule of law and rights of the citizen.
“I do see however that you’ve successfully tried and convicted the aleged murderers...”
Unlike most other posters here I have actually read the article, allow me to quote from it;
“All of those arrested have acknowledged their roles in Gabler’s murder”.
I hope they get a fair trial, something which some so called supporters of the US Constitution on this forum seem to believe could be dispensed with when it came to their victim.
Shame on them, and may Mark Gabler rest in peace and eventually receive justice.
Actually I have done some more research, some pertinent facts regarding the “guilt” of Mark Gabler about which super sleuth you are so certain.
Gabler was living with the wife of the man accused of murdering him. Oh, so no possibility of a jealous husband then, eh? No need for a trial, Gabler must be guilty because his lover’s ex-husband says he is.
Furthermore, the man accused of murdering Gabler then went on to use Gabler’s credit card fraudulently after the murder. Jee whizz, a murderer and a thief I can see why you’d take this man’s word at face value, no need for a trial at all, Gabler must obviously be guilty.
Yet you still choose to believe the word of these low life, theiving, murdering scumbags and accept that Gabler deserved to be killed just on their word alone.
You bonehead.
And I hope some of the freepers you hold in contempt serve on their jury if it is proven that the “victim” did molest the child
We’ll never know the truth now of course because the lying, thieving, boneheads who you seem so fond of made sure there would be no trial to find out what really happened.
By the way that must be the weirdest accusation I’ve ever heard, “a person who matched Gabler’s description”, so actually they have no idea whether there was any molestation nor indeed if Gabler was even involved.
But we do know Gabler’s murderers are lying theiving criminals and you Sherlock Bonehead seem to have the case well sewn up, no need for evidence, no need for a trial or jury, no siree the ex-husband, a murderer and thief, says Gabler done it so it must be true.
Bonehead.
Yes, I will fight hard to defend individual liberty and hard won rights like the right to a fair trial from keyboard boneheads who can’t comprehend simple issues like basic justice.
I am disappointed that you seem so keen to defend the boneheads.
And yet another bonehead comes out of the woodwork!
If and, it’s a freaking enormous “if” given the circumstantial evidence of fraud and disfunctional personal relationships involved in this story, the child really was molested by Gabler then she will never be able to prove it because the lying, thieving, murdering boneheads that you seem so keen to defend destroyed any chance of ever proving Gabler’s guilt.
What is wrong with you? Can’t you grasp simple concepts like the right to a fair trial?
If you were accused of child molestation would you simply accept that you must automatically be guilty even if the people accusing you were thieves and liars?
Would you accept that the only punishment you deserved would be to be murdered by your accusers and have your body dumped like trash?
Is the right to a fair trial all a bit too complicated for you or something?
Considering that you don’t like the US Constitution so much are you sure this is the right forum for you?
Sounds as if you have a dog in this fight. Past accusations perhaps?
At least we “boneheads” aren’t boorish and rude. Nor do we have mush for brains.
“Past accusations perhaps”
Oh brilliant, the bonehead speaks, I defend a man’s right to a fair trial so jeez, that must mean I’m a pedophile too!
Bonehead maximus.
Listen, just for the record I happen to know who you are and I have access to your computer and I’ve seen all the interesting stuff you’ve been downloading, you know, the stuff involving small children and what you like to do with them. I know you are involved in making and distributing child pornography.
As such, by your own admission, you have no right to a fair trial, my word is sufficient and you should be murdered and have your body dumped like trash (I will also steal your money at the same time), just like Mark Gabler.
And all the other boneheads, like you, will agree with me, they will think you must obviously be guilty of the accusations I make and will support the actions I take, your name and reputation will be destroyed.
How do you like that pedo? No much, eh?
Well why do you think it was good enough for Mark Gabler?
I agree.
And if the prosecution is asserting that the “Victim” was guilty of pedophelia - there is no way I could ever vote to convict.
How many jurors does the prosecution get to reject, and how many do the defense get to reject?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.