Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activist groups take full advantage of new media outlets to spread their message (Rucker/Van Jones)
The Washington Post ^ | December 28, 2010 | Krissah Thompson

Posted on 12/28/2010 2:53:33 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

...Rucker, whose group has four staff members, remains relatively unknown, and Color of Change tends to take on issues that are more controversial than traditional civil rights groups. (Rucker's group was co-founded by former Obama administration official Van Jones. Jones is no longer affiliated with the group.)

"Everyone knows about the NAACP," Rucker said. "There is a great power in that. At the same time, there are challenges as we enter into a digital age. There are a lot of dynamics that organizations have to keep up with or you can't be as effective. I'm not going to wait for anybody. I'm not going to defer to anybody when there's an opportunity to move issues."

Color of Change, for example, led a boycott against conservative commentator Glenn Beck after a program last year in which Beck called the president a "racist." Beck has since said that he regrets the statement. The boycott, which continues, has received mixed reviews, but Rucker calls it a success.

More than 300,000 of his online members sent e-mails or called advertisers of Beck's programs, and dozens of advertisers left, including Geico, LexisNexis' Lawyers.com, Progressive Insurance and SC Johnson, according the trade publication Brandweek. Beck has condemned Color of Change's boycott on his show, and he remains among cable's most-watched news personalities.

"Glenn Beck's audience likes him. They believe in him. You're not going to get people to stop watching, but advertisers tend to be pretty timid," said Tobe Berkovitz, a political consultant and advertising professor at Boston University....

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: colorofchange; obama; rucker; vanjones
A nice front page ad courtesy of The Washington Post.
1 posted on 12/28/2010 2:53:39 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why do they need new media outlets when the old ones do such a great job cheerleading for these Communist pigs ?


2 posted on 12/28/2010 2:58:55 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Even Fox News is lost. They are now allowing Global Warming Hoax activists to be presented as having a credible opinion worthy of ‘Debate’. Moral relativism. They should be doing investigative reporting on the ‘Haox of the century. Disgusting.


3 posted on 12/28/2010 3:36:58 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

I USED to watch fox... now I watch only selective shows and for a very limited time these days. They are as liberal and disgusting as cnn... maybe worse.

LLS


4 posted on 12/28/2010 3:43:14 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a dim to enter the kingdom of GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Worse... they pretend to be the opposing viewpoint. In reality they are not.


5 posted on 12/28/2010 3:46:02 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Americanism vs Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The only real way to combat this is an aggressive counter boycott. As soon as these gansta thugs in suits call for a boycott, there needs to be an announcement of a counter boycott on conservative outlets such as the Free Republic.

Getting indignant or winning an argument with liberal acquaintances isn't going to do it. You may feel better about yourself and your side but, without an aggressive counter attack, you will lose and the thugs will win.

6 posted on 12/28/2010 4:20:29 AM PST by Sir_Humphrey (Wanting my country back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Now here is what the Washington COMpost and most other liberal rags won't likely ever tell you about Van Jones or any of the other hardcore radicals surrounding Obama...

Van Jones links "Green Movement" to revolutionary communist movement!

See "Goal is complete revolution" below...

VAN JONES (Obama's former 'Green Jobs Czar'):

YouTube:
"Valerie Jarrett, Senior Advisor to President Obama, speaks [lovingly] about Green Job Czar, Van Jones, at the Netroots Convention on August 12, 2009. Then Van Jones speaks about [a COMMUNIST] transforming [of] the whole society."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnDxzvc0OXk&feature=related
_________________________________________________

"Jones was the leader and founder of a radical group, the communist revolutionary organization Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement, or STORM. That group, together with Jones' Elle Baker Center for Human Rights, led a vigil Sept. 12, 2001, at Snow Park in Oakland, Calif.

STORM's official manifesto, titled, "Reclaiming Revolution," surfaced on the Internet."--via TheObamaFile
http://www.leftspot.com/blog/files/docs/STORMSummation.pdf
_________________________________________________

VAN JONES SHOCK ADMISSION [in his own words]: "Goal is Complete Revolution"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh4Z0V0zNQg
_________________________________________________

Here is the transcript of the above YouTube video:

“Right after Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat if the civil rights leaders had jumped out and said OK now we want reparations for Slavery, we want redistribution of all the wealth, and we want to legalize mixed marriages. If we’d come out with a maximum program the very next day, they’d been laughed at. Instead they came out with a very minimum. “We just want to integrate these busses…”

But, inside that minimum demand was a very radical kernel that eventually meant that from 1964 to 1968 complete revolution was on the table for this country.

And, I think that this green movement has to pursue those same steps and stages.

Right now we say we want to move from suicidal gray capitalism to something eco-capitalism where at least we’re not fast-tracking the destruction of the whole planet. Will that be enough? No, it won’t be enough. We want to go beyond the systems of exploitation and oppression all together. But, that’s a process and I think that’s what’s great about the movement that is beginning to emerge is that the CRISIS is so severe in terms of joblessness, violence and now ecological threats that people are willing to be both pragmatic and visionary.

So the green economy will start off as a small subset and we are going to push it and push it and push it until it becomes the engine for transforming the whole society.

SOURCE for this transcript (it matches the video):
http://ironicsurrealism.blogivists.com/2009/09/02/van-jones-obamas-green-czar-%E2%80%98green-jobs%E2%80%99-goal-is-%E2%80%98complete-revolution%E2%80%99-away-from-%E2%80%98gray-capitalism%E2%80%99/
_________________________________________________

Here's the original source for the Van Jones quote about the time he spent in jail following the Rodney King/LA riots (Jones was arrested in "peaceful" protests in San Fran). It was in a 2005 interview he did with East Bay Express. They of course (what else?) claim he "renounced his rowdy Black Nationalist ways" since then (yet he's calling for "complete revolution" in Aug 2009! ...see above):

But in jail, he said, "I met all these young radical people of color -- I mean really radical, communists and anarchists. And it was, like, 'This is what I need to be a part of.'" Although he already had a plane ticket, he decided to stay in San Francisco. "I spent the next ten years of my life working with a lot of those people I met in jail, trying to be a revolutionary." In the months that followed, he let go of any lingering thoughts that he might fit in with the status quo. "I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th," he said. "By August, I was a communist."

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/gyrobase/the-new-face-of-environmentalism/Content?oid=1079539&showFullText=true
_________________________________________________

The 1992 LA/Rodney King riots were instigated by the Revolutionary Communist Party...

From David Horowitz's FrontpageMag.com /DiscoverTheNetworks.org:

"Throughout its history, one of RCP's [Revolutionary Communist Party] principal objectives has been to foment civil unrest in the United States. The most notable example of such efforts occurred on April 29, 1992, when RCP members looted and trashed the downtown and government districts of Los Angeles, triggering the infamous Rodney King riots. During the days immediately preceding the violence, RCP -- which maintained close ties to the L.A. gangs known as the Crips and the Bloods -- had circulated throughout South Central Los Angeles a leaflet featuring a statement by RCP National Spokesman Carl Dix, titled 'It's Right To Rebel' -- a quote popularized by Mao Zedong.

Encouraged by Dix, RCP activists helped lead the riots that would leave 58 people dead, more than 2,300 people injured, some 5,300 buildings burned, and $1 billion in property damaged or destroyed. On the ten-year anniversary of the rioting, RCP member Joseph Veale fondly recalled the violence as 'the most beautiful, the most heroic civil action in the history of the United States.'"
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6197

7 posted on 12/28/2010 5:03:43 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

re: “advertisers left, including Geico, LexisNexis’ Lawyers.com, Progressive Insurance”

These are left-wing Democrat companies. A better question is why conservatives and tea party types do business with the above, rather than with their conservative competition?


8 posted on 12/28/2010 5:06:26 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is especially dangerous to good ideas. Marxism, liberalism, progressivism or whatever its being called today is particularly effective on a bumper sticker.

These simplistic ideas and whispering campaigns focusing on imagined conspiracies and reinforcing disinformation taught K - College are completely twitterable.

We’ve got to be ready to respond. Conservatives need to educate themselves not only on the issues, but presentation.

For instance, we’re on the defensive as regards homosexuality because the libertarian argument and the liberal argument in favor of homosexuality are so simple as to appear true. It’s hard to attack a victim group and their perverse behavior is never publicly exposed - it is both intentionally covered up and obscene - both of which make it difficult to present to alternative media channels.

We need to take Marketing 101 for conservative ideas:

http://www.leadershipinstitute.org/training/School.cfm?SchoolID=17354

http://www.leadershipinstitute.org/training/School.cfm?SchoolID=17333

http://www.leadershipinstitute.org/training/School.cfm?SchoolID=17351


9 posted on 12/28/2010 5:11:20 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

big surprise


10 posted on 12/28/2010 5:40:35 AM PST by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks Cincinatus' Wife.
11 posted on 12/28/2010 4:21:33 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine; All
Right on. "Controlled Opposition." Have you checked out this Freeper page? FREEPER ETL
12 posted on 12/29/2010 1:51:35 PM PST by Larousse2 (The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson