Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A letter sent out to parents and signed by Swampscott's new principal, Layne Millington, informed the recipients that "all parents or guardians must attend." If parents failed to show at the meeting or failed to make other arrangements to meet with the principal their kids would not be allowed to participate in extracurricular activities.

But what about homeschool students and others that are not enrolled in the public school, yet attend some of the extra curricular activities?

Couldn't they just send home a note to be signed by the parents?
1 posted on 01/11/2011 10:32:54 AM PST by Sopater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sopater

Homeschooling and private schools are the answer.


2 posted on 01/11/2011 10:34:44 AM PST by GeronL (How DARE you have an opinion!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Are they referring to Mother and Father or Parent 1 and Parent 2? /sarc


3 posted on 01/11/2011 10:38:04 AM PST by mrmeyer ("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

>>But what about homeschool students and others that are not enrolled in the public school, yet attend some of the extra curricular activities? <<

Here in MI, HS parents would get the same note.
If they did not attend, their children would not be in the ECAs.


4 posted on 01/11/2011 10:38:51 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Here in MA, we are all slaves of the state. We are all “just following orders”.


5 posted on 01/11/2011 10:40:46 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Parents should have signed up for the “other arrangements.” One parent comes in at 8, the next at 8:30, then 9:00, 9:30, 10:00, 10:30, 11:00, through the principal’s lunch hour, then continued through the afternoon, the next day, the next several days, the next several weeks, and on through until the end of the year. Of course, they could have stopped this by attending a school board meeting and calling for a mass firing of administrators. Parents have forgotten they have the final say in how the school is run.


6 posted on 01/11/2011 10:41:28 AM PST by bgill (K Parliament- how could a young man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

Check this out

W. Virginia Bill Would Yank Your Driver’s License if Your Kid Misses Too Much School

http://www.parentdish.com/2011/01/10/w-virginia-bill-would-yank-your-drivers-license-if-your-kid-mi/?icid=maing|main5|dl6|sec1_lnk3|35757


7 posted on 01/11/2011 10:41:48 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

What does the principal have to say about drug or alcohol abuse “challenges” that couldn’t be accomplished by sending each family a copy of the brochures issued by the police department? Parents can’t or won’t read them? Oh, well ...


11 posted on 01/11/2011 10:53:49 AM PST by Tax-chick (The gifts we have, we are given to share.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The way my husband and I have raised our children and evaluated their friends has infinitely more to do with their not drinking and taking drugs than all the health classes and DARE programs they ever sat through.

And many of their peers, who sat through those same classes, do get drunk at parties and take drugs. So I would be ticked at any principal who thought I needed to learn from the professionals.

My daughter just came back from college and told me she’d skipped a party because there was going to be pressure to do vodka shots. I thought, Yes! Thank you, God!

Of course the school administrators think all parents are blind with the “Not my darling” mindset. So that means my daughter must be a sneaky little thing.


15 posted on 01/11/2011 11:07:19 AM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

The kids were just born drug users.

Why are their civil rights being violated this way?

/sarcasm


18 posted on 01/11/2011 11:27:52 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

I don’t see why this requirement is unreasonable at all. There is a new policy affecting students who take part in extracurricular activities; parents are required to attend a session about the policy or else their kids can’t participate. Makes perfect sense to me—and my kid is homeschooled.


19 posted on 01/11/2011 11:29:13 AM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sopater

I couldn’t stand these meetings and always made the wife go. I simply could not accept 20-somethings who were educated by American colleges (Schools of Education, specifically) passing judgment on my kids. I’m perfectly capable of assessing my kids and understanding their weaknesses. I would trust a homeless person ahead of these clowns. In any case, it appears that my kids did just fine with my wife going there and ignoring all of their garbage.


22 posted on 01/11/2011 6:18:17 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson