Skip to comments.
Young minority women screened at higher rate for chlamydia than young white women
Eurekalert ^
| Monday, January 24, 2011
| Cindy Fox Aisen, IU
Posted on 01/25/2011 2:48:32 AM PST by SunkenCiv
A new study from the Indiana University School of Medicine and the Regenstrief Institute has found that Black and especially Hispanic young women are screened for chlamydia at a significantly higher rate than young white women. This discrepancy in screening rates may contribute to nationwide reporting of higher rates of this sexually transmitted disease among minority young women...
Despite a recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to annually screen all sexually active young women for this disease, only about half of sexually active women, ages 14 to 25, who receive health care, are screened appropriately. The IU and Regenstrief researchers found that black young women were 2.7 times more likely and Hispanic young women 9.7 times more likely to be screened for chlamydia, compared with white young women.
In addition to race or ethnicity, the researchers found screening likelihood varied by insurance status and also by age. Women with public insurance had greater odds of chlamydia testing, compared with women with private insurance.
(Excerpt) Read more at eurekalert.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: chlamydia; minoritieshardesthit; std; sti
Sarah E. Wiehe, M.D., M.P.H., is an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Indiana University School of Medicine and a Regenstrief Institute affiliated scientist. Photo credit: Indiana University School of Medicine
1
posted on
01/25/2011 2:48:38 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...
- Minority women hardest hit
- Obamacare agitprop
- Chlamydia, Chlamydia, the Encyclopedia
2
posted on
01/25/2011 2:50:36 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
chlamydia screening site:freerepublic.comGoogle
3
posted on
01/25/2011 2:52:06 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: SunkenCiv
Does that mean that racist doctors are putting white women’s health at risk because they don’t like white people?
4
posted on
01/25/2011 2:52:54 AM PST
by
cartan
To: SunkenCiv
And the take home message is what? That you should test everyone? That clinical judgment of risk based on sexual history and exposures shouldn't be considered? That all physicians are racists? What?
To: SunkenCiv
Young minority women screened at higher rate When I first read this title, I thought it said "Screamed."
No kidding.
6
posted on
01/25/2011 3:22:04 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: SunkenCiv
While everyone should be screened, when a patient comes in with a screaming yeast infection, 3 babies under her arms and answers “yes” to multiple sex partners, I’d say a mandatory chlamydia screening would be in order.
Just saying.
7
posted on
01/25/2011 3:26:54 AM PST
by
poobear
(FACTS - the turd in the punch bowl of liberal thought!)
To: poobear
Yeah, the future authoress of “an agenda-driven life” ignored that, or there were already laws on the books to prevent gathering that kind of data. Bureaucrats do what they’re told, but choose how to do it in order to be effective with the least work. :’)
8
posted on
01/25/2011 4:01:38 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: SkyPilot
That probably happened too, but wasn’t in the study. ;’)
9
posted on
01/25/2011 4:02:18 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: pieceofthepuzzle
The message is, Sarah E. Wiehe wants a job in the Obama administration.
10
posted on
01/25/2011 4:02:57 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: cartan
11
posted on
01/25/2011 4:03:07 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: SunkenCiv
12
posted on
01/25/2011 4:04:29 AM PST
by
Dallas59
(President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
To: SunkenCiv
4.Chlamydia,clitty litter
13
posted on
01/25/2011 4:28:19 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: SunkenCiv
the researchers found screening likelihood varied by insurance status and also by age There is the answer in a nutshell. No research needed, just some accounting.
14
posted on
01/25/2011 4:31:09 AM PST
by
doodad
To: All
so... er .. how about them asian women?
15
posted on
01/25/2011 4:35:55 AM PST
by
VAFreedom
(maybe i should take a nap before work)
To: SunkenCiv
16
posted on
01/25/2011 4:39:10 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: SunkenCiv
What the Hell is the TSA doing now?
17
posted on
01/25/2011 4:39:10 AM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't skipper a boat, Can't drive, Can't ski, Can't fly. But they KNOW what's best!)
To: SunkenCiv
Once again, unequal outcome = RACISM.
18
posted on
01/25/2011 6:33:42 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson