Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Dems call for gun hearings
Politico ^

Posted on 01/28/2011 1:20:14 PM PST by Sub-Driver

House Dems call for gun hearings By: John Bresnahan January 28, 2011 12:46 PM EST

A top House Republican rejected calls by Democrats for hearings on gun safety in the wake of the Jan. 8 shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), suggesting that such hearings could interfere with the prosecution of the alleged gunman, Jared Loughner.

Rep. John Conyers (Mich.), top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, and 15 other Democrats on the panel sent a letter to Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) on Friday seeking hearings on several gun-safety issues related to the Tucson shooting. Six people died in that attack and 14 others, including Giffords, were wounded. Giffords was transferred to a Houston hospital this week to begin a long-term rehabilitation program.

Smith said the inquiries Democrats proposed have merit, but timing them before Lougher’s trial could have the “unintended effect of prejudicing the ongoing criminal proceedings.”

While acknowledging that there is little support in Congress for broad gun-control measures, Conyers and his Democratic colleagues suggested the hearings - and congressional action - should be “a carefully crafted and narrowly focused review of these issues and other possible loopholes in current law.”

“We fully recognize and appreciate the sensitivity of the subjects raised by the recent tragedy in Tucson in which our colleague, Gabrielle Giffords, was shot and eighteen other were wounded or killed, including members of her staff, a Federal judge, and several other citizens,” the Democrats wrote. “However, we also believe it is not only possible, but imperative that Congress review the relevant issues in a civil and objective [manner].

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ban; control; democrats; giffords; gun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2011 1:20:15 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The 'rats need to invest in hearing protection.


2 posted on 01/28/2011 1:22:41 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Anything to detract attention from the debt crisis.


3 posted on 01/28/2011 1:26:11 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
No.
4 posted on 01/28/2011 1:26:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun." -- Barry Soetoro, June 11, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Notice how they didn’t call when they could have done something. It’s just scumbags stirring up the radicals to make noise. Ignore them.


5 posted on 01/28/2011 1:27:04 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They will use executive orders and ATF regs this time.


6 posted on 01/28/2011 1:28:13 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
we also believe it is not only possible, but imperative that Congress review the relevant issues in a civil and objective [manner].

Setting up the ol' "If you disagree with us, you're uncivil and unobjective" argument.

7 posted on 01/28/2011 1:29:26 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Give ‘em a ball and tell them to go play in the street.


8 posted on 01/28/2011 1:30:02 PM PST by Sequoyah101 (Half of the population is below average)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I hope they do discuss it. This is an issue that is a big fat stinking loser for them. Their side already has anybody who is sufficiently anti 2nd Amendment. They don't get any more votes by being more anti 2nd Amendment.

There are many rural liberals, who no matter how liberal they are, know that they need guns (guns being a fact of life in rural America).

9 posted on 01/28/2011 1:34:45 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I would go along with this if the law simply stated that no democrat or democrat supporter could ever be allowed to purchase or own a firearm.


10 posted on 01/28/2011 1:36:46 PM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Tell John Conyers to pay more attention to his jailbird wife and his son driving around in Govt. Caddillacs, and dont be so bothered about passing new laws on guns.

We have plenty of laws now thank you.


11 posted on 01/28/2011 1:36:54 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Not if they don’t want us to emulate Egypt! Private citizens in the USA have over 6000% more weapons than the military and law enforcement combined .


12 posted on 01/28/2011 1:42:58 PM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Gun safety issues? Like proper backstop, safe handling, and hearing and eye protection? I can go for that.


13 posted on 01/28/2011 1:44:06 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

“imperative that Congress review the relevant issues “

The “relevant issue” is Sheriff Dipstick! I lay all the fault in his lap! And I think that that will all come out during the investigation and trial.


14 posted on 01/28/2011 1:53:14 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Pity the stupid Liberals fail to recognize that we, in the rest of America, have a Different Definition of GUN Control.

Theirs is Confiscate.. ours is...

HITTING the TARGET

YO, IDIOT LIBS ...you SURE you wanna try this????


15 posted on 01/28/2011 1:58:45 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (NY... Can't afford to Live Here... Can't Afford to LEAVE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; B4Ranch; Lurker; Noumenon
Oh, there will be gun hearings all right.

Gun hearings and seeings and feelings.


Today is a good day to die.
I didn't say for whom.

16 posted on 01/28/2011 2:09:27 PM PST by The Comedian (Stop voting for The Government Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Any little thing, now. Any little thing at all...


17 posted on 01/28/2011 2:14:12 PM PST by Noumenon ("We should forgive our enemies, but not before they are hanged.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

I’d invite them to the .50 cal range and then not offer any ear protection. That way they’d get the full benefit of their requested gun hearings. They shouldn’t be able to hear too much after a long day at the range but I’m sure they’ll enjoy it.


18 posted on 01/28/2011 2:16:57 PM PST by B4Ranch (Do NOT remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

.....shall NOT be Infringed!!


19 posted on 01/28/2011 2:18:13 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Trying to wrap my hands around the words “rural liberals”.

“Yes We Can!” stickers on their tractors?

Raise only free-range chickens?

Kinda confused.

BTW, there are lots and lots of hypocritical urban liberals who own guns and when pressed say they need them for protection against violent conservative criminals.


20 posted on 01/28/2011 2:31:42 PM PST by elcid1970 ("Now, now, we mustn't jump to conclusions here!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson