Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grampa Dave; redgolum; SunkenCiv; muawiyah; Kaslin
A bit of a reach there. Not a lot of corn goes to the ME.

But a lot of wheat stopped going there due to corn ethanol subsidies.

"To be fair, not all of the food inflation can be blamed on the Fed. A good part of this problem can also be placed at the doorstep of bipartisan U.S. policies to subsidize ethanol."

"According to the Wall Street Journal, in 2001, only 7% of U.S. corn went to ethanol. By 2010, the ethanol share was 39%. So instead of growing wheat, our farmers are growing corn in order to cash in on ethanol subsidies."

Bingo! The article has great arguments against Keynesian economics, the Fed and subsidies. I'll be happy if we don't get another war.

41 posted on 02/01/2011 7:38:57 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

There were some problems in Russia, and I forget where else (not the US) that led to wheat supplies (and barley, it says here) going shorter than expected in 2010. As always, it had zero, nothing, nada to do with corn for ethanol.

Ag prices are sensitive to petroleum prices, not the other way around.

Nice of the WSJ to shill for OPEC though. No surprise there. Conversions I looked up; 1 metric ton = 45.9296 bushels, One Hectare = 2.47 acres:
50 posted on 02/02/2011 4:09:39 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson