Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
They are going by the ‘rules’ instead of the Constitution. As I understand it, there is a ‘rule’ which states that an ongoing ‘funded’ item cannot be ‘defunded’ the way Steve King is proposing. Pelosi, somehow, put automatic funding in the bill itself.

They are standing by the ‘rules’ instead of the Constitution (and their oath(s).

It doesn't matter that the whole monstrosity was passed by every trick in the book and broke every rule written. Or that the pos in the WH refuses to bow to any law restricting him, the repubs have asserted that they ‘will not break the rules’.

99 posted on 02/15/2011 12:37:10 PM PST by Outlaw Woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Outlaw Woman

Thanks.

So I take it they must pass a special bill to defund it? Certainly congress has that power... better yet, hold a vote to eliminate that rule. What does that buy is, or is too late to change rules this session?

A bigger problem is that Boehner promised MANY times last year to defund it if Republicans won the house. That looks bad.


107 posted on 02/15/2011 12:41:19 PM PST by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: Outlaw Woman
the repubs have asserted that they ‘will not break the rules’.

Even though the entire thing has been tossed out by a judge as unconstitutional. This ruling is their risk free way out of the entire mess.

I'm afraid there's more at play here than repubs simply standing by the rules.

136 posted on 02/15/2011 1:22:32 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson