Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Signs of serious trouble at Iran's nuclear reactor
Guardian ^ | February 26, 2011 | Julian Borger

Posted on 02/26/2011 4:23:09 PM PST by Pan_Yan

Today, Iran confirmed a UN report that it will have to remove the uranium fuel rod assemblies from the reactor core, a significant setback.

The reactor has been under construction since the Shah's era in the 1970's. The fuel assemblies were finally introduced into the reactor four months ago and it was meant to start producing electricity in January, but that deadline was missed.

Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Tehran's envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the ISNA news agency that the fuel was being removed on Russian advice:

Based on Russia's request to run tests and technical measures, the fuel will be unloaded from the core of the reactor and will be returned to it after completion of the tests

Reuters quotes a source "close to the project" as saying the fuel may have been contaminated by the old and deteriorating metal equipment used in the construction of the reactor core.

...

On 23 February 2011, Iran informed the Agency that it would have to unload fuel assemblies from the core, and the Agency and Iran have agreed on the necessary safeguards measures.

The Iranians have been on record as saying that the Bushehr plant was affected by the Stuxnet computer worm, which is widely believed to have been a joint venture in cyber warfare by the US and Israel. But the initial signs are that Stuxnet has not played a part in this setback. Before Soltanieh spoke, ISIS provided an instant analysis of the IAEA report, saying it had learned that:

the unloading may be motivated by concerns about the possible sabotage of the fuel assemblies or defective fuel assemblies.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushehr; iran; nucleariran; nukes; russia; stuxnet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 02/26/2011 4:23:12 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

That Atomic Energy stuff is harram.


2 posted on 02/26/2011 4:24:51 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Maybe they want to purify out the uranium or plutonium and turn it into bombs, or use the rod material as is for dirty bombs


3 posted on 02/26/2011 4:27:23 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

As Atom Ant used to say, “excrement occurs.”


4 posted on 02/26/2011 4:27:47 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I suppose they could be doing this to make it a
more attractive target for Israel, then afterwards
scattering radioactive material around the country
and decrying Israels use of weapons of mass destruction?


5 posted on 02/26/2011 4:28:07 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Probably was hit by a virus.
I had that happen to my computer many years ago. - Tom
6 posted on 02/26/2011 4:29:09 PM PST by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

OK, theres’ a problem.. short of stuxnet assisted mutation from bushwher into chernobyl... problems earlier? alluded to.

Worthy of watching, tho full disclosure doubtful.

Small possibility tho, of upcoming Iran Israel strike, in wchich case, CCCP likely would prefer not to have THEIR nuke fuel being source of widespread dirty problemm when Israel retaliates...


7 posted on 02/26/2011 4:32:56 PM PST by kendwell (The task.... is not yours to finish. Nor are you to refrain from it altogether)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The Oscar for ‘Best performance by a Worm’ goes to Stuxnet.
8 posted on 02/26/2011 4:33:19 PM PST by JPG (As WI goes, so goes the nation. Thank you, Gov Walker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Stuxnet may have already damaged the reactor.
9 posted on 02/26/2011 4:37:07 PM PST by mountainlion (The government is not my god no matter how much they preach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Stuxnet may have already damaged the reactor.

Possibly, but the incompetence of the Iranians shouldn't be discounted. After all, they sit on a sea of oil, yet they import gasoline because they lack the technical expertise to refine crude oil in sufficient quantities to support their own domestic needs.......

10 posted on 02/26/2011 4:40:24 PM PST by Thermalseeker (The theft being perpetrated by Congress and the Fed makes Bernie Maddoff look like a pickpocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

The fuel assemblies haven’t been in there long enough to have converted anything. They only started fueling it recently.

Russian reactors are frequently “safed” by removing fuel assemblies and replacing them with additional control rods while reactor cooldown is continued. There are a lot of reasons why you may have to defuel this early, and none of them are good. This is why QA is so high on these plants (or is supposed to be) so you prevent serious FUBARs like this one.

Russian technology is not the most reliable in the world. They have always shot for the biggest and frequently blown a few toes off. Just a year or so ago they had a massive failure at a hydroelectric plant (of all things!) that killed 70 people or so, and we have never heard a reasonable explanation of that one either.

And don’t get me started on the Lenin Nuclear Power Station, Chernobyl, Ukraine...


11 posted on 02/26/2011 4:40:45 PM PST by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Interesting comments, thanks.

Anybody know where this little gem is located vis a vis populated areas?


12 posted on 02/26/2011 4:43:21 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Sometimes bad things happen to bad people.


13 posted on 02/26/2011 4:48:23 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

My suspicion is that the Russians are getting cold feet.


14 posted on 02/26/2011 4:54:47 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

That was the first thing I thought when I read the article.


15 posted on 02/26/2011 4:56:26 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Possibly, but the incompetence of the Iranians shouldn't be discounted. After all, they sit on a sea of oil, yet they import gasoline because they lack the technical expertise to refine crude oil in sufficient quantities to support their own domestic needs.......

There are more reasons for this than incompetence. The vast majority of Iranians I know and have worked with are quite competent, in a wide variety of fields. Of course, they're also the ones over here.

I would suspect corrupt government / management is the more proximate cause.

16 posted on 02/26/2011 5:03:45 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Could be the vagina syndrome


17 posted on 02/26/2011 5:06:03 PM PST by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Jay-sus, this reactor is located on the Iranian coast at the very head of the Persian Gulf

Imagine a Chernobyl affecting the oilfields of Saudi, Iraq, Kuwait, and all the Gulf states, plus the shipping lanes into and out of the entire Persian Gulf

18 posted on 02/26/2011 5:07:52 PM PST by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter; Robert A. Cook, PE
Russian technology is not the most reliable in the world. They have always shot for the biggest and frequently blown a few toes off.

Yup. And the stories out of the massive 3 Gorges Dam project in China haven't been so great either.

19 posted on 02/26/2011 5:09:05 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|http://pure-gas.org|Must be a day for changing taglines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Third rate Russian technology operated by fourth rate muzzie fanatics?

What could go wrong?


20 posted on 02/26/2011 5:18:49 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson