Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Low-flow toilets cause a stink in SF
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | February 28, 2011 | Phillip Matier,Andrew Ross

Posted on 02/28/2011 6:33:25 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

San Francisco's big push for low-flow toilets has turned into a multimillion-dollar plumbing stink.

Skimping on toilet water has resulted in more sludge backing up inside the sewer pipes, said Tyrone Jue, spokesman for the city Public Utilities Commission. That has created a rotten-egg stench near AT&T Park and elsewhere, especially during the dry summer months.

The city has already spent $100 million over the past five years to upgrade its sewer system and sewage plants, in part to combat the odor problem.

Now officials are stocking up on a $14 million, three-year supply of highly concentrated sodium hypochlorite - better known as bleach - to act as an odor eater and to disinfect the city's treated water before it's dumped into the bay. It will also be used to sanitize drinking water.

That translates into 8.5 million pounds of bleach either being poured down city drains or into the drinking water supply every year.

Not everybody thinks it's a good idea.

A Don't Bleach Our Bay alert has just gone out from eco-blogger Adam Lowry who argues the city would be much better off using a disinfectant like hydrogen peroxide - or better yet, a solution that would naturally break down the bacteria.

As for whether the supposedly environmentally friendly, low-flow toilets are worth the trouble? Well, according to Jue, they have helped trim San Francisco's annual water consumption by about 20 million gallons.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; flush; liberalidiots; liberals; lowflushtoilets; plumbing; sewage; stink; toilets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Lady Jag; Fantasywriter

The Wookie’s “toilet” is a special design:

Picture something like the Grand Canyon only with Titanium walls and a roaring river below to handle the highly corrosive, 100 tons per minute, 20 times per day events.

No wonder, they have been digging in the WH since the summer. Apparently, it’s an outhouse as designed above.

The Wookie isn’t Mary Antoinette. The historical Paris underground sewer system would have been instantly plugged in a single event and France would have become a wasteland.

Professor Alinsky, Renowned Consultant in All Shitty Matters


81 posted on 02/28/2011 8:02:04 AM PST by melancholy (Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag

LOL

They would have us believe that theirs doesn’t stink.


82 posted on 02/28/2011 8:04:34 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife (Allhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2122429/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

Ah,old memories there..out on s*** burning detail I see.

Wish I`d taken one of those shots,tho I do have one of
the pi** tubes that were buried in our Co area


83 posted on 02/28/2011 8:08:33 AM PST by Harold Shea (RVN `70 - `71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

I assume the chemical will be added at offending points in the system, such as a pumping station, long before it hits the treatment plant. If the author gives the impression it will be added right before final discharge to the environment, I think that is probably incorrect.


84 posted on 02/28/2011 8:11:32 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: melancholy
Wookie's toilet is ugly.


85 posted on 02/28/2011 8:13:22 AM PST by Lady Jag (Keep the 'ICk" in Democratic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic

Water quality standards set a range of residual disinfectant concentration in potable water. Put too much of that stuff in the potable water and they will violate water quality standards. Someone is clueless.”””

I live on a septic system. Have since 1993. Lived on septic on the farm from 1947 to 1963.

There are certain things you cannot do with a septic system.

One of them is to use bleach. Another is to use a garbage disposal. A third is to pour hot grease into your sink/drain. Feminine tampons is another absolute NO NO.

The BLEACH destroys the active bacteria that is needed to make the septic system function properly.

The ground up junk from a garbage disposal clogs a septic system, as it isn’t designed to handle such debris.

Grease NEVER should be put down a sink/drain. It may be hot & moving when you pour it, but within seconds, it is cooled & attached itself to the insides of all your pipes. This will surely end in disaster for you & a bonanza for your plumber.

The tampons are easy to deduce.

RID-X is the thing to use. Flush a dose down your toilet every month & you will never have a problem. My father built a new house in 1966 & I inherited that house. He was religious about the use of Rid-X. When I sold the property to my brother & the state of Wisconsin insisted in 2005that there MUST be a septic problem after all those years, they required my brother to dig it up.

The entire system was clean as a whistle. No clogs. No unusual items found. The septic system & the Rid-X had done a stellar job.

I do not use bleach. Too old for tampons.

I use Rid-X here with regularity. My neighbor across the street has exactly the same sype of system & length of leach lines. Their house has a garbage disposer, which the wife insisted was OK to use.

They have had 2 tear-ups of the system in less than 6 years.

I cannot fix stupid.


86 posted on 02/28/2011 8:15:40 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Yes I think he is incorrect on the point you made (before discharge) and incorrect when he said it was going to be added to drinking water. Like I said, I get the impression he is clueless. Have a great day.


87 posted on 02/28/2011 8:16:29 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
CFLs are similar to 1.6 gpf toilets in that they are hated by many Conservatives.

lol

I agree. Most of my sockets have CFLs and they do cut the electric bill.

I bought my first two in the early 1980s. In the late 90's they were still working.

Several years ago, I started replacing incandescents with CFLs. I have only had 2 that went bad. One was almost immediate, so I think it was defective. The other was because of a bad socket. Other than that, some of them are now about 5 years old and still working.

I moved in late 2009. In the new place, the bathroom has no windows, so it gets very little light. The switch is sort of hidden. So, I installed a lamp with a 10-watt CFL. I leave it on 24/7. It has been going for well over a year.

The complaints that they don't last is not true.
88 posted on 02/28/2011 8:17:23 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
A Don't Bleach Our Bay alert has just gone out from eco-blogger Adam Lowry who argues the city would be much better off using a disinfectant like hydrogen peroxide - or better yet, a solution that would naturally break down the bacteria.

There is a natural solution that's already at work; hence the "rotten egg" smell the locals are complaining about! Lots of happy little microbes are digesting tons of liberal crap in the underhydrated sewer system. Unfortunately for the tender noses of the Pelosi constituency, the little beasties are also producing tons of hydrogen sulfide in the process.

It seems fitting, however, that Babylon-by-the-Bay should start to smell like a third-world cesspool.

89 posted on 02/28/2011 8:20:43 AM PST by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Thanks for your comment and yes, septic systems need a whole different approach from what a public sewer system needs. Problem is, like we all know, the idiots that make the decisions keep pouring good money after bad, and they never look at what the unintended consequences could be. Frustrating, and yes, you can't fix stupid neighbors, or stupid “experts” running the show. UGH!
90 posted on 02/28/2011 8:24:47 AM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

bookmark to read more later.


91 posted on 02/28/2011 8:41:21 AM PST by razorback-bert (Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Low-flow toilets cause a stink in SF
Skimping on toilet water has resulted in more sludge backing up inside the sewer pipes, said Tyrone Jue, spokesman for the city Public Utilities Commission. That has created a rotten-egg stench near AT&T Park and elsewhere, especially during the dry summer months.

From an Engineering point that just doesn't make any sense or even seem plausible. As that old saying goes:

Sh*t flows downhill
And that saying is a truism as sewer systems function because of that Law of Physics called Gravity. If you look at a map of SF and where AT&T Park is located, any 'sludge buildup' there cannot be blamed on Low Flow Toilets. Even the first generation models that weren't exactly engineered correctly - thanks to congress and their deadline mandate.

FWIW we have a 'Low Flow' toilet in our Powder Room. I installed it when I remodeled the Room a few years ago. The wife wanted a Kohler and I wanted American Standard. She won - naturally - and I put the Kohler in. More important; It's never had to be 'Double Flushed'. And when you flush it, you know it's being flushed. It's a 'Man Flush' ;-)

92 posted on 02/28/2011 8:46:33 AM PST by Condor51 (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a Congressman. But I repeat myself. [Mark Twain])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

My Googling came up with 180 gallons per person per day.

That makes 20 million gallons the equivalent of 304 people.

The “savings” is most likely a made up statistic anyway to show some positive result out of this greenie “eco-toilet” disaster.


93 posted on 02/28/2011 8:46:53 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
they have helped trim San Francisco's annual water consumption by about 20 million gallons.

So, have the water rates gone up since revenue went down due to lower consumption?

94 posted on 02/28/2011 8:51:04 AM PST by reformed_dem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
You haven't been worried about the mercury in fluorescent tubes (8 times as much) for the last 70 years or so?

Nope, but I haven't been forced to put them everywhere in my living area, either. If they were the only game in town, I suspect that I'd have paid more attention to them, beyond the one in my (well ventilated, cement-floored) garage workshop.

So, I think you're right in that it's a bit of a red herring, but it's still a valid one, IMHO.

I appreciated the info on the toilets. I just purchased a house that use the low flow ones, none of them work with a flip. I'll check the brand names - I had just chalked it up to "low flow". Figured that, more or less, a toilet was a toilet.

95 posted on 02/28/2011 9:04:11 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: faucetman
You haven't been worried about the mercury in fluorescent tubes (8 times as much) for the last 70 years or so?

Nope, but I haven't been forced to put them everywhere in my living area, either. If they were the only game in town, I suspect that I'd have paid more attention to them, beyond the one in my (well ventilated, cement-floored) garage workshop.

So, I think you're right in that it's a bit of a red herring, but it's still a valid one, IMHO.

I appreciated the info on the toilets. I just purchased a house that use the low flow ones, none of them work worth a flip. I'll check the brand names - I had just chalked it up to "low flow". Figured that, more or less, a toilet was a toilet.

96 posted on 02/28/2011 9:04:30 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Harold Shea
Wish I`d taken one of those shots
That isn't my photo, but believe me, I have boo-koo "hands on" experience. LOL ...
Glad you made it back 'bro.
97 posted on 02/28/2011 9:26:58 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
Toilets contribute very little water to sewer...its the showers and washing machines and dishwashers which contribute most of the water.

Well, there ya go. It's SF, the stinking hippies don't shower or wash their clothes, thus the problem.

98 posted on 02/28/2011 9:53:17 AM PST by IYAS9YAS (Rose, there's a Messerschmit in the kitchen. Clean it up, will ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

Sewer pipes are usually placed at as low a slope as possible, and need at least 2 feet per second velocity to “self-clean” at a given rate of flow. Being a non-pressure system, either a steeper pipe slope or a higher flow are needed to move things along and prevent clogging.

If the new toilets produce a lower flow per flush, then velocity drops below 2 fps in the main, and things pile up in the pipe until enough flow develops to flush things through...


99 posted on 02/28/2011 10:05:45 AM PST by castlebrew (Gun control means hitting where you're aiming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew

“If the new toilets produce a lower flow per flush, then velocity drops below 2 fps in the main, and things pile up in the pipe until enough flow develops to flush things through...”

Toilets are a very minor portion of the water in a sewer...sinks, dishwashers, washing machines, etc....etc..


100 posted on 02/28/2011 10:22:38 AM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson