Automatically I would wonder how many times something similar had been tried by would be market sabotagers before. Maybe this time they were “lucky”?
You mean like Barney and Chris holding the government hostage to one of their social welfare redistribution schemes?
I think it was more likely some of the big manipulators like Soros or Goldman Sachs or J.P. Morgan. There was definitely some manipulation, but more likely from the NWO crowd or the banksters than “terrorists.”
The Saudis and some of the other oil sheikhs have that kind of money, but I don’t think it’s in their interest to bring down the world economy. In fact, I suspect that they’re seriously annoyed with Obama for letting things get out of hand like they have, in Tunisia and Egypt.
Many people were suspicious that something organized was going on when that meltdown occurred. Maybe if we just let it happen, we would have found out that it was a deliberate attack on our economy. As it stands there has been no satisfactory explanation. To the contrary the current administration does not want us to know the sinister nature of the event. Thanks to places like Pajamas Media, and Michael Savage's book "Trickle up Poverty," more and more information on that event is being made public.
That’s been quite a broadcast and dissemination today (many columns). The answer is no. The economy was undermined in late 2007 by global interests. There were many disseminations then that reduced consumer activity would slow Asian manufacturing down and bring oil prices down. ...didn’t happen. From December 1st, 2007, there was a general, early hiring freeze. Layoffs began after that.
It didn’t work. Oil is still going up, and the dollar, down, while east Asia continues to increase production.
That depends on your definition of “terrorist”.
Are the Boston Fed, Bawney Fwank, Jimmy Carter and his Community Reinvestment Act, Bill Clinton and his enforcement of it, W and his utopian ownership society and greedy CEOs, credit analysts and boards of directors considered terrorists?
If so the answer is yes.
I remember hearing about this and would like to read the article but it's no longer at this link. I guess that means it didn't happen /s
I wouldn’t eliminate this as a possibility. Other fundamental factors set us up for a financial meltdown. Someone or several someones could have interfered to make it worse than it would otherwise have been.
God how I do remember this day and the weeks that followed, as I could not shake the deep feeling in my pit that this “crash” was no accident and that it was planned and executed on cue to help the Won, before he was the ‘Won’ but only the ‘One’, win. Within a month my home lost 30% of it’s value. Terrorists my a$$. This is a smokescreen. There was pure evil at work then, and the players are now mocking WTP for believing their lies covering their evil deeds. Our economy is under attack alright, but I seriously doubt it is by some muzzies in caves. We witnessed their preferred method for ‘crashing’ the market on 9/11/01. What happened in 2007 was indeed another attack, but by whom has not been revealed ... yet.
Yes. I think it was.
Wall Street’s Collapse to Be Mystery Forever