Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joule Unlimited On Track To Beat All Known Biofuel Processes
BioFuel Daily ^ | 2/25/2011 | Staff Writers

Posted on 03/02/2011 2:44:33 PM PST by Wonder Warthog

Joule Unlimited has invented a genetically-engineered organism that it says simply secretes diesel fuel or ethanol wherever it finds sunlight, water and carbon dioxide.

The Cambridge, Mass.-based company says it can manipulate the organism to produce the renewable fuels on demand at unprecedented rates, and can do it in facilities large and small at costs comparable to the cheapest fossil fuels.

Joule's process directly yields hydrocarbons that are fungible with existing diesel infrastructure, unlike the biodiesel product that is produced from algal oil.

Highlights include:

Based on empirical measurements, Joule can directly produce 15,000 gallons of diesel per acre annually, as compared to 3,000 gallons of biodiesel produced indirectly from algae.

The solar-to-product conversion efficiency of Joule's direct, continuous process for producing diesel, ethanol and chemicals is between 5 and 50X greater than any biomass-dependent process, and gains additional efficiencies by avoiding downstream refining.

Joule's combined advances in genome engineering, solar capture and bioprocessing result in photosynthetic conversion efficiency of more than 7% relative to available yearly solar energy striking the ground, many times greater than prior


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: biodiesel; biofuel; diesel; energy; geneticengineering; johnpodesta; joule; podesta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: Wonder Warthog
Nope. This is direct conversion to diesel. No de-esterification or further chemical processing needed.

Here's a fun thought: capture CO2 and cooling water from a coal-fired power plant, and feed it to these little critters....

61 posted on 03/03/2011 7:17:32 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

I hope this works,but if my math is right it would take 15,000 acres to produce 15,000 bbl/day of diesel (say a conventional small oil field development)


62 posted on 03/03/2011 9:49:33 AM PST by RGF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Can they do it without being subsidized by the taxpayers?


63 posted on 03/03/2011 9:52:13 AM PST by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Yep - and it would be sulfer-free, too.


64 posted on 03/03/2011 10:01:19 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
"Here's a fun thought: capture CO2 and cooling water from a coal-fired power plant, and feed it to these little critters...."

I suspect that is (one of) the game plan(s).

65 posted on 03/03/2011 10:19:44 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RGF
"I hope this works,but if my math is right it would take 15,000 acres to produce 15,000 bbl/day of diesel (say a conventional small oil field development)"

We've got lots of marginal/desert land available. And this would take way less land than to generate the equivalent amount of ethanol from corn.

66 posted on 03/03/2011 10:21:19 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RGF

US Annual diesel consumption = 64,323,336,000 US Gallons
Divide by 15000 gal/acre

= 4,288,222 acres
divide by 665 acres/mile^2

=6,448 miles square
~a square, 80 miles to a side.

About 2X the size of WSMR.


67 posted on 03/03/2011 10:22:27 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
"Can they do it without being subsidized by the taxpayers?"

I haven' specifically looking into that question, but my impression is that thus far they have. Research is apparently being completely funded by venture capital.

68 posted on 03/03/2011 10:22:38 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Can the bugs live in saltwater?


69 posted on 03/03/2011 10:23:42 AM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: patton
"Can the bugs live in saltwater?"

Certainly, strains of cyanobacteria (which is what this group is using) CAN live in saltwater. Whether these genetically modified ones can do so, I have no idea. I didn't notice any mention of that capability in their publication.

But if you mean "in the wild", I doubt it, as they are tailored specifically for a very high CO2 feed rate and probably would be "outcompeted" by the wild strains in a different environment (aka "the ocean").

70 posted on 03/03/2011 12:55:35 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: patton
"WSMR."

??? I'm not familiar with that acronnym. It refers to what??

71 posted on 03/03/2011 12:57:36 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Sands_Missile_Range

Scroll down and look at the picture on the right - it illustrates the sise of WSMR compared to NM. By my calculation, above, all of the diesel needs of the US could be met in an area twice that size.

The reason I asked about salt water is because NM is floatin, literally, on an ocean full of salt water. Fresh water, on the other hand, costs more. A lot more.


72 posted on 03/03/2011 1:05:13 PM PST by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: patton
"Scroll down and look at the picture on the right - it illustrates the sise of WSMR compared to NM. By my calculation, above, all of the diesel needs of the US could be met in an area twice that size."

AH! I've actually used the same comparison, but didn't connect the acronym to the full name.

"The reason I asked about salt water is because NM is floatin, literally, on an ocean full of salt water. Fresh water, on the other hand, costs more. A lot more.

Well, it depends. I grew up between the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers. Lots of cheap fresh water there. In New Mexico, not so much....:^).

But since the "diesel gene trick" is using modified cyanobacteria, I'm sure they could come up with both salt and fresh water versions, since there are cyanobacteria native to both environments.

73 posted on 03/03/2011 6:21:55 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Another article on here somewhere mentioned subsidies


74 posted on 10/13/2016 7:49:43 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson