Supremes' 'avoidance behavior' on eligibility called 'appalling'

WND ^ | March 08, 2011 | Bob Unruh

[RobinMasters]

An attorney who has been working with a case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says it is appalling the Supreme Court justices are allowing the constitutional rule of law to be destabilized by their "avoidance behavior," and it's even worse that two of Obama's appointees apparently participated in the recent case conference.

"Their defiance of the court cases, their attitude they don't really need to adhere to the law, is really unparalleled," said Laurence Elgin, one of the experts working with the Constitutional Rule of Law Fund and website and monitoring the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister case.

"The public is going to grow increasingly concerned about Obama and the failure of the courts to deal with these concerns," he told WND today.

It was just a day earlier the Supreme Court posted its March 7 "orders list" in which the case, "10-678 Hollister, Greg S. V. Soetoro, Barry et al," was refused a hearing in the court.

The case petition had argued, "We have not exaggerated in presenting the question of the constitutional rule of law being at stake in this matter. … A man has successfully run for the office of president and has done so, it appears, with an awareness that he is not eligible under the constitutional requirement for a person to be president."

[Revolting cat!]

Fake Supremes!

[allmost]

The law is clear. They should still look.

[Frantzie]

There is no law. The law is what the Democrats and Obama make up - enable by TV and the idiots who watch it.

[He Rides A White Horse]

There is no law. The law is what the Democrats and Obama make up - enable by TV and the idiots who watch it.

Don't forget the largest enablers of all---judges legislating from the bench.

The judicial branch is taking huge bites out of the legislatures. On every level.

How many times have we seen this; a legislature overturned by 'Unconstitutional', often with the most flimsiest of reason.

[JohnKinAK]

They probably won’t do anything when the 2012 election is suspended/canceled due to a “National Emergency” either.

[SatinDoll]

The ONLY way to get rid of a sitting President is through Congress. It is in the Constitution, folks.

All these lawyers — they’re wasting their time and talent on the Supreme Court, and it’s all for nothing because they, the Supreme Court justices, just don’t have the constitutional authority to do anything in this instance.

Quo warranto: the U.S. congress (for obvious political reasons) has given authority, for trying a usurper, to the Washington, D.C., District Courts. Via quo warranto, obama must prove he is eligible, as a natural born citizen, to be President.

[hosepipe]

I have been suspicious of Bush's two Supreme appointments..
As I became suspicious of Bush..

I would Not be surpised if they turned on "us"...
Not completely but just enough... like the State suits against Obamacare.. or something else...
The whole Bush family appears to be progressives.. stealth conservatives..

[LucyT]

[sionnsar]

their attitude they don't really need to adhere to the law, is really unparalleled

Not enough a legal historian to say one way or the other, but it's hardly the first time they've held considerations other than law above the law.

[LucyT]

. . . . # 7 , and # 8.

.

[piytar]

The Court is in a real bind here.

If they hear an eligibility case, they KNOW how they will have to rule. That will cause a Constitutional Crisis and possibly (likely) a civil war.

However, given the laws being passed in several states, that’s going to happen in 2012 anyway unless obastard doesn’t run.

And at that point, the Court’s credibility will have been irreparably damaged with a significant percentage of the country.

Like I said, a real bind...

[Walts Ice Pick]

Write to Boehner and Issa. Ask them to subpoena the Hawaiian birth records so that people have something real to bring to court.

[Razz Barry]

"If Congress called up the Air Force Individual Ready Reserve the respondent Obama would have to give the order … If, as it appears, those orders would not be lawful, Col. Hollister would be bound … to question them and look to the respondent [Vice President Joe] Biden as constitutionally next in succession for lawful orders," the pleading said.

IMHO, I don't think Biden is constitutionally next in succession. If Barry goes, so does everyone around him. Boehner would be president and we'd have riots in the streets. The courts are never going to touch this. Forty years from now, the truth will come out when it's to late to do anything about it.

[azishot]

It seems to me that SCOTUS can and should rule on what a “natural born Citizen” is. Then let congress do it’s job and impeach him or have the military arrest him for the fraud that he is??

At this point, the whole dang government is ‘appalling’. We need a do-over.

[thatjoeguy]

Here’s a conspiracy for you guys, what if he IS an American? What if the reason he’s fighting to keep his BC hidden is because his father ISN’T the guy from Kenya but some local nut job and for obvious reasons he doesn’t want anyone to know?

Just saying... :)

[Diogenesis]

SCOTUS is not of the American people.

They are corrupt and traitors to the US Constitution
who prefer the death of every American to their
actually following their own Oaths.

[Diogenesis]

American Traitors (meeting with a litigant):
"As of today there is no more Law. No more free America.
As of today, it is only for "our people".
Death to John Jay. Death to America."

[bgill]

There is no law. The law is what the Democrats and Obama make up - enable by TV and the idiots who watch it.

Beat me to it.

[bgill]

I became suspicious of Bush.

As many of us did. Something happened midway through. It was like an invasion of the body snatchers. Once they got out of office, even their women folk went to the dark side. I'm very disappointed and disgusted with them all.