Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing’s biggest-ever plane makes maiden flight
Dow Jones Newswires-Wall Street Journal ^ | March 21, 2011

Posted on 03/21/2011 8:47:48 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Hodar
It is progress so long as the A380 can stay in the air as reliably as the "old" 747 technology.

I flew the Sydney to Singapore route a couple months after the first A380's entered SQ service. Nothing special except the business class seats were weird. The seat and back were about three feet wide with a long seat belt that didn't really hold one in place side-to-side, and the little compartment where one's feet go after reclining the seat was offset to one side. I was in a starboard side seat so it was offset to my right. Result: impossible to get comfortable and pain in my hip once I got up after an 8 hour flight.

And after the recent engine failures on a couple Qantas A380's I will try as much as possible to stay with B747's for any really long haul flights.

21 posted on 03/21/2011 9:12:03 AM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tflabo
Are they making the coach seats any wider? Sitting in the middle seat of a 737 is torture unless one is stick twig thin and neighbor is not a whale.

I hear you loud and clear. But, to the best of my knowledge, the extra space is being used to pack in more passengers. If you want a wide seat - ya gotta bump up to Business or First.

22 posted on 03/21/2011 9:12:57 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

BTTT


23 posted on 03/21/2011 9:13:08 AM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: refermech

“Sometimes bigger is not better. To make it effective they have to fill the seats don’t they?”
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

No problem.

All the manufacturing outsourcing execs will fill them on flights to our friend China.


24 posted on 03/21/2011 9:13:48 AM PDT by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
747-8 is supposed to consume less fuel and have a better cost per seat than the A380.

Both are Ultra-Large, meant for only Airports that can handle them and meant for the long distance intercontinental flights.

So if the 747-8 has less of a carbon footprint and costs less per seat, it may edge out the A380 in the publics mind IMHO.

25 posted on 03/21/2011 9:20:14 AM PDT by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnG45
Am I color blind or is your picture ... ?

Check your monitor's color settings, or those of your operating system. Many web browsers have little in the way of proper color matching.

26 posted on 03/21/2011 9:25:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: katana

As with any new aircraft, there are going to be some bugs to work out.

I was surprised to hear about the weirdness of the seats. That’s surprising to hear. I’d hope they would be able to fix this with a relatively minor amount of effort.


27 posted on 03/21/2011 9:26:27 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement
Video Take off
28 posted on 03/21/2011 9:29:52 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian; Bobalu
That isn't the 747-8.

This is the 747-8:

It's a candy. It's a breath mint. Wait, you're both right.

Bobalu's picture is of the 747-8F freighter. Yossarian's picture is of the 747-8i Intercontinental passenger aircraft.

Both aircraft share the 787's GEnX engines (modified for bleed air,) a longer fuselage, and supercritical wing.

The 787-8F sports a shorter upper deck (it isn't used for cargo) and a nose cargo loading door. The 747-8i sports the longest upper deck ever seen in a 747, and is second only to the Airbus A380-800 in passenger capacity.


29 posted on 03/21/2011 9:30:21 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sr4402

The question comes down to the cost/passenger and the volume of passengers on a partiuclar route.

Do you fly 1 of the Airbus 380’s or two of the B747’s?

Airbus is selling them, each one sold is a huge sale for Airbus, and a huge loss for Boeing.

Boeing SHOULD be able to compete, carbon fiber and other light-weight materials, better engines, sophisticated electronics and robotic assembly all working together to make stronger, lighter, faster and more efficient aircraft.

When it comes to innovative designs - I tend to look to American ingenuity. Anymore, we are seeing it come from someplace else, first. That’s a disappointment.


30 posted on 03/21/2011 9:31:31 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Boeing, what has happened? You used to lead the world, now you are polishing a 40 yr old design, and crowing about your achievements

Boeing is an aircraft manufacturer - they either make a profit or go out of business. The 747 is a cash machine and the 747-8 is as modern as any commercial aircraft flying.

Airbust is a socialist program to provide employment - doesn't matter if they make money or not, and they won't make money on the A380.

Plus, when the last A380 is flown to the boneyard, the aircrew will fly back home on a 747.

31 posted on 03/21/2011 9:31:31 AM PDT by LIBERTARIAN JOE (Don't blame me - I voted for Ron Paul!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

One of the biggest mistakes the Air Force ever made was choosing the Lockheed C-5 over the 747.


32 posted on 03/21/2011 9:33:39 AM PDT by wolfman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LIBERTARIAN JOE
and they won't make money on the A380.

Sounds like wishful thinking ... Did you know that Airbus has orders for 244 of the A380-800 and have delivered 44 of them to date? Source

If history tells us anything, ANY company that milks a cash cow, dies a horrible death as soon as the cash cow dies. And that appears to be what Boeing is doing. They have a ~40 yr old design, that has been modernized - but is essentially a 40 yr old design; competing against aggressive companies like Airbus and CRJ. Boeing is losing contracts, and unless they can innovate - they are going to go the way of McDonnel Douglas, Lockheed and other aircraft manufacturers.

33 posted on 03/21/2011 9:39:25 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement


Rare Photograph from 1944, Nazi Germany. Good thing we stopped them before these got off the ground ...
34 posted on 03/21/2011 9:42:30 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Is this innovation enough?


35 posted on 03/21/2011 9:43:31 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

There’s not much in the latest 747 that was there in the original. The cockpit, avionics, engines and even the wings are completely different from the original.

Sometimes a good basic design can last a long time. Take the Mauser rifle action, with some tweaking it’s survived as one of the most beloved actions worldwide for well over a hundred years.


36 posted on 03/21/2011 9:44:04 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

bttt


37 posted on 03/21/2011 9:44:46 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Sounds like wishful thinking ... Did you know that Airbus has orders for 244 of the A380-800 and have delivered 44 of them to date?

Did you know that the break-even point for Airbus on the A380 is at approximately 420 units? Source.

OTOH, don't even ask what the current break-even point for Boeing's 787 is...

38 posted on 03/21/2011 9:45:22 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

THATS what I’m talking about!!

Whazzit? Haven’t heard of it, but I love the flying wing design.


39 posted on 03/21/2011 9:45:41 AM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Have you ever considered that the proposed 380 F (that may never be produced) carries a mere 5% more payload but its OEW is 40% more than the 747-8F.

As Randy Baseler put it, with the A380F, you're flying around over 40% more airplane structural weight for only 5% more revenue payload!

Baseler also addresses the longer range of the 380.

40 posted on 03/21/2011 9:49:24 AM PDT by skeptoid (The road to serfdom is being paved by RINOs, and Lisa Murkowski is their mascot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson