Posted on 03/22/2011 11:58:28 AM PDT by Ballygrl
Obama may be in deep trouble… Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court
By Rebel Rouser from Texas
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama’s major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, ‘That’s not true,’ when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court’s ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring until ‘Obama is gone.’ Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle.
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can ‘opt out.’
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted information concerning discrepancies in Obama’s history that raise serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg. Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.
Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even during the Nixon years.
Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration. In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona.
That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New Black Panther Party.
The group was caught on tape committing felonies by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the polls.
A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against blacks, particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their babies.
This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration crumbling — that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Well?.....Maybe.
So far, the Supreme Court has demonstrated that it has the collective gonads the size of a dust mite.
Social Security numbers used to be issued with prefixes according to state. Obama's begins with 042, which was reserved for Connecticut.
One more thing:
Maybe the members of the Supreme Court have been threatened. Who knows. We’ll know if any of them have cousins that mysteriously disappear.
Considering the way the "other team" has chosen to play, all's fair in love, war AND saving Our Country.
Not to nit pick but States do not require you to purchase auto insurance, they require you to prove financial liability, purchasing auto insurance is but one way to do it.
About time, if true.
What about the ignoring of a Federal Court Injunction...in fact two Federal Court Injunctions?
This is excellent, well-written and encouraging.
This occurred and was posted back on 3-08-10 so it's not current news....... Here is a few articles from FR back in the time......
Nixon’s skirts were clean compared to LBJ, JFK, FDR, Harding, Wilson and Grant, just to mention a few.
The problem with this whole line of thinking is that it misunderstands the role of the Supreme Court. It is an appellate court, and only has original jurisdiction under limited facts not applicable here. Absent original jurisdiction in a case already filed, it doesn't take evidence that wasn't admitted in a court below, and certainly doesn't conduct its own investigations.
As for Nixon, it wasn't the Supreme Court that took him down. He was in the process of being impeached by the House when he resigned.
Social Security numbers
http://www.theobamafile.com/_eligibility/SocialSecurity.htm
Prayers that someone in authority’s curiosity is piqued enough to check it out.
I do like the article... thanks for posting.
Unfortunately, as it pertains to politicians, justice comes far to infrequently.
I will not hold my breath.
nice.
She spoke with BOTH Justice Roberts & Scalia at their book signings or public appearances. She spoke to Justice Roberts about Obama and he said if she would leave the information she had brought with her (a big stack) he promised to look at it. (I saw video of this). She gave stuff to Scalia as well. She has had several cases make it as far as the 9 judge panel.
Don't be swayed by the people that say she is crazy. She is the energizer bunny in the fight about ineligibility. She has been in the forefront of this issue from the beginning. Has filed more lawsuits than anyone. She has covered every aspect of this issue and was the first to discover the SSN issue. Ignore any warnings you may get about the web site being unsafe. I have been going there for years and never had a problem. She has been under constant attack on her various web sites and personally.
You could spend days reviewing all the archives and info on her site. She posts EVERYTHING as a public record.
She is a true patriot. A little different, I admit, but a cool lady.
And old. Published 3-8-2010.
Exactly right.
There is reason for optimism...
Deep trouble for Obama = great hope for the American people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.