Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Springs Man Claims To Have Obama's Draft Records (Col. Gregory Hollister)
The Denver Channel 7 ^ | 03/30/2011 | Staff

Posted on 03/30/2011 11:35:57 AM PDT by Smokeyblue

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 last
To: Smokeyblue

Is this SS# the same as when he registered to run for pres? Or is the application taboo also?


121 posted on 03/30/2011 4:15:10 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (Where is our military?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Yep, the high school graduating class of 1978 was the first year required thanks to JC.


122 posted on 03/30/2011 4:21:10 PM PDT by GBA (Those who die with the most liberty...Win! Ever Vigilance: For the children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
from article: Hollister could face charges of identity theft and fraud.

But Obama goes scott-free even though he has used as many as 33 different social security numbers.

They will prosecute this guy for simply trying to verify the legitimacy of the CIC, but Obama is allowed to use other people's social security numbers without question.

I think this is all part of Obama's plan to destabilize our system of law.... turn it on it's head, apply it as unequally as visibly possible, refuse to prosecute friends, and relentlessly pursue political enemies.... overload the system, and when someone cries foul, then divert attention away from it by doing something else unconstitutional somewhere else.

Na-na-na-na-naaaa-naaaa.... you can't catch me... screw you I won...

And the media sing's backup.

I sure hope this guy turns over everything he has to as many alternate media sources as possible... because precedence says that once it's out there, it's fair game.
123 posted on 03/30/2011 4:34:50 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomobs
if you steal an identity from someone who stole it, who goes to jail?

No one. The Supreme Court actually ruled recently that using someone's SSN# fraudulently, was not identity theft, since he didn't know the person from whom he borrowed the number.

Truth is stranger than fact. Junior Samples

124 posted on 03/30/2011 4:55:04 PM PDT by itsahoot (Almost everything I post is Sarcastic, since I have no sense of humor about lying politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

So what, BD?

0b0z0llah is a (man?) of the world. He has ss #s from Zimbabwe, Libya and maybe Captain Kid’s old number.


125 posted on 03/30/2011 5:03:16 PM PDT by melancholy (Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

I hope he uses that as a defense~!!!


126 posted on 03/30/2011 5:38:35 PM PDT by Mr. K (Job #1 DEFUND THE LEFT then Palin/Bachman 2012 -Unbeatable Ticket~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

bump
to go back and check the PO delivery point barcode under the blanked out address (gotta figure out how to do it)


127 posted on 03/30/2011 6:16:40 PM PDT by John Galt's cousin (Principled Conservatism NOW! * * * * * * * * * * Repeal the 17th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

“Yeah, it must’ve been sad to his mother that he was born a blue-lipped zombie and not human like all the other kids.”

uh.

What?


128 posted on 03/30/2011 8:07:10 PM PDT by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: John Galt's cousin; Brown Deer
"to go back and check the PO delivery point barcode under the blanked out address (gotta figure out how to do it)"

What is a POSTNET Barcode and How Can You Decode It?

The Postal Service developed the POSTNET (POSTal Numeric Encoding Technique) barcode to encode zip code information on letter mail for rapid and reliable sorting by barcode sorters (BCSs). The POSTNET barcode can represent a five-digit ZIP Code (32 bars), a nine-digit ZIP+4 code (52 bars), or an eleven-digit delivery point code (62 bars).

The illustration below shows the basic format of a 5-digit zip code POSTNET barcode.

Each digit of the zip code is represented by 5 bars, therefore a 5-digit zip code uses 25 bars to represent the numbers. However, whether it represents five-, nine-, or eleven-digit zip code information, the POSTNET barcode is always printed in a format that begins and ends with a frame bar, which appears as a full or tall bar. To ensure POSTNET accuracy during mail processing, a correction character, which is five bars, must be included immediately before the rightmost frame bar of all POSTNET barcodes. The correction character is always the digit that, when added to the sum of the other digits in the barcode, results in a total that is a multiple of 10. For example, the sum of the ZIP+4 barcode 12345-6789 is 45. Adding a correction character of 5 results in the sum of the 10 digits being a multiple of 10. [Edit: Not sure, yet, how this factors into the image below]

The basic elements of the POSTNET barcode are binary digits represented as full bars and half bars, which are also referred to as tall bars and short bars. A full bar represents the number 1 and a half bar represents the number 0.

Each code character is made up of five bars, which together represent a single numeric digit. Specific combinations of two full bars and three half bars represent the digits 0 through 9. Only the 10 combinations shown in the Code Elements illustration are valid code characters.These 10 combinations represent all possible combinations of two full bars and three half bars. Also, these combinations are central to POSTNET error recovery because the system interprets any five bars that contain a combination other than two full and three half bars as an error.

The weights of the digits are not the same as standard binary, where the values are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 from the least to the most significant digit. Instead, the digits are weighted as 0, 1, 2, 4, and 7. Except for zero, you can determine the numeric value of each valid combination of five bars by adding the weights of the two positions occupied by the full bars (1s). For example, the combination 01010 contains a full bar in the second position (weight 4) and in the fourth position (weight 1). Adding 4 and 1 yields 5, which is the assigned value of this combination. The only exception is the combination 11000, which has a total weight of 11 but is assigned a value of zero.

Therefore, below would presumably be zip+4 = 80908-3034. The next two numbers are the "delivery point", in this case 30 and the last digit is the check number.

More information from the USPS:

POSTNET™ Barcode Certification

And, according to this site: http://savepostage.com/bulkmail101/barcode.html the POSTNET bar code is supposed to be phased out by May 2011, to be replaced by "Intelligent Mail Barcodes (IMBs).

129 posted on 03/31/2011 11:36:29 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I googled the zip plus 4 code. It is reported (in several identical blogs) as being the address of Col. Hollister in Colorado Springs.

I had assumed that the redacted address was supposed to be the address to which Selective Service had sent the original draft card.

You never cease to amaze me with the extent of your knowledge and research skills. Thank you!


130 posted on 03/31/2011 7:53:41 PM PDT by John Galt's cousin (Principled Conservatism NOW! * * * * * * * * * * Repeal the 17th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Fractal Trader; LucyT; warsaw44; ColdOne; Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!; GQuagmire; wintertime; ...

Ping...................

Thank you, Fractal Trader.


131 posted on 04/06/2011 8:28:45 AM PDT by melancholy (.Papa Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The Birther issue shows everyone that the whole system is corrupt. Any one who is not addressing the BC issue is in league with the ruling elite’s and the tyrants. But I repeat myself.


132 posted on 04/06/2011 8:39:30 AM PDT by stockpirate (Rebellion to tyranny is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny B.

Are you sure about that? My sons fall in that birth year range, and they had to register at 18.


133 posted on 04/06/2011 8:43:56 AM PDT by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

But he used a SSN that Social Security says was never issued.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

It’s hard to determine how accurate the reporting is when the author of the article makes such blantant errors such as saying Obama’s birth certificate was posted. No! No! A birth certificate was **never** posted. It was an image of a **certificaTION**, and there are real reasons to believe this certificaTION was forged.

Who knows.

Anyway how is it possible to steal an identity of a person that Social Security says never existed?


134 posted on 04/06/2011 9:10:47 AM PDT by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Are you sure about that? My sons fall in that birth year range, and they had to register at 18.
Yup, I'm sure. I turned 18 in 1977, and they had ended Selective Service before then, and a few years later, when they started it up again, there were a few years (including 1977) that were not required to register.

Here's the relevant part of the Wikipedia article:

On March 29, 1975, President Ford signed Proclamation 4360, Terminating Registration Procedures Under Military Selective Service Act, eliminating the registration requirement for all 18–25 year old male citizens.[9]

On July 2, 1980, however, President Carter signed Proclamation 4771, Registration Under the Military Selective Service Act, retroactively re-establishing the Selective Service registration requirement for all 18–26 year old male citizens born on or after January 1, 1960. Only men born between March 29, 1957, and December 31, 1959, were completely exempt from Selective Service registration.


135 posted on 04/06/2011 10:04:31 AM PDT by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Jedidah
Are you sure about that? My sons fall in that birth year range, and they had to register at 18.
Note that Obama (assuming he is being truthful about his birth date) would have had to register, but not until a couple of years after he turned 18.
136 posted on 04/06/2011 10:07:03 AM PDT by Johnny B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Interesting.


137 posted on 04/06/2011 10:09:56 AM PDT by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

but if what he obtained proves fraud, what jury would ever convict him?

I’d give him a medal.


138 posted on 04/06/2011 9:08:31 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Send these articles to trumps website.


139 posted on 04/06/2011 9:14:19 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (Who needs Al Queda to worry about when we have Obama?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-139 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson