Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Rule Review Leaves Some Nervous, Skeptical
Yahoo.Com ^ | 3-3-2011 | Nancy Benac

Posted on 04/03/2011 10:25:53 AM PDT by blam

Edited on 04/03/2011 10:48:04 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Obama Rule Review Leaves Some Nervous, Skeptical

Nancy Benac, Associated Press
Sun Apr 3, 8:25 am ET

WASHINGTON – In a city that loves to argue over what next to add to the government's already fat rulebook, there's a big push to rethink what's already there.

All across town, agencies are holding hearings, scouring specs, setting up websites and assembling plans to carry out President Barack Obama's order for a "retrospective review" of decade upon decade of government regulations.

The hunt is on for rules that are — to pull a few words from the order itself — excessively burdensome, redundant, inconsistent, overlapping, outmoded, ineffective, insufficient. Or, as the president put it, "just plain dumb."

Regulations translate laws into action, and touch all aspects of American life.

There are rules on how to keep water clean and how much water should be used to flush a toilet; for how much gas cars can guzzle, and — under one now in the works — for rear-view cameras or sensors to keep drivers from backing over toddlers; for how to build commercial airplanes — right down to their nuts and bolts — and for how to launch amateur model rockets.

Obama's pledge to put the federal rulebook under a microscope has conservatives clamoring for him to rip up pages of red tape, yet skeptical he will deliver. Liberals increasingly worry that the Obama administration will bow to political pressure and weaken or scrap important health, safety and environmental protections.

The notion that there are reams of "dumb" rules ripe for the taking is rejected by experts on federal regulation. They say any easy targets already were eliminated by past administrations that made their own runs at over-regulation.

Excerpt... AP


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: communism; communists; fascism; obama; regulations; rules
Heaven help us...the Anti-Amerricam Commie terrorists will destroy us from within:

"At the center of this mammoth undertaking is Cass Sunstein, Obama's regulatory chief, who says the debate over whether the government has too many regulations misses the point.

1 posted on 04/03/2011 10:26:00 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

When these morons “simplified” the tax code they added hundreds of pages to it. Whe they’re done we’ll have a book of rules on how to eliminate rules that will be so complex that it will be impossible to eliminate rules.


2 posted on 04/03/2011 10:47:57 AM PDT by hometoroost (It takes a community organizer to start a kinetic military activity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

By using the regulatory rules process Obama is pushing an agenda that could not pass Congress. Cap and trade and even more draconian environmental policies are for example being pushed under the radar by the EPA.


3 posted on 04/03/2011 10:48:07 AM PDT by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hometoroost

You are dead on!


4 posted on 04/03/2011 10:50:29 AM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
"The question is how to get it right, not do we want more or less," Sunstein said in an interview.

This cannot be good!

5 posted on 04/03/2011 10:55:47 AM PDT by depressed in 06 (Hope and change is share the poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This sounds good on the surface, but Barry isn’t a leader. He is a fraud who rules by committees and czars. Imagine the mess they could make.


6 posted on 04/03/2011 10:57:18 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Food Safety Act, for starters.

We have to stop giving enviros and activist groups unlimited access to petition the system to get ridiculous standards the yield marginal returns for trillions in costs to businesses and citizens.

We need to change the laws so that any attempt to ‘improve’ things must be weighed against the cost and what it will do to the economy.

We need to up the standards to make sure all regs are founded on solid science. The standards must become more stringent the more pristine you try to make things, in order to justify the cost of the standards on the economy.

Congress needs to OK all major changes in regulations plus anything new that is regulated, like CO2.


7 posted on 04/03/2011 10:58:38 AM PDT by Free Vulcan (Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The REAL reason for the review is to see if there are any regulations they’ve forgotten about which, if enforced, would further damage capitalism.


8 posted on 04/03/2011 11:17:53 AM PDT by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
The REAL reason for the review is to see if there are any regulations they’ve forgotten about which, if enforced, would further damage capitalism.

Exactly! They are looking for anything they missed!

9 posted on 04/03/2011 12:38:32 PM PDT by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pallis
This sounds good on the surface, but Barry isn’t a leader. He is a fraud who rules by committees and czars. Imagine the mess they could make.

He is a fraud. He is a poor leader who is basicly told what to do by advisors, each of whom have there own agenda. Obamacare is not really Obama's Health Care Law! It is a conglomurate of all the leftist wish lists. But I do love to pin that tail on that annointed donkey.

10 posted on 04/03/2011 12:57:17 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (It's the end of the world as we know it. And I feel fine. - R.E.M.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06

Sunstein-— what does he mean by “RIGHT” Right for whom? the progressivist communist totalitarian agenda? THOSE rules would be preserved to expedite the takeover of the statists.

Get it “right” indeed. Re-align the power structures, the bureaucracy. About which see— the “peoples commisariats”

God Save US!!

Deo Vindice


11 posted on 04/03/2011 1:57:17 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Bump.


12 posted on 04/03/2011 2:39:19 PM PDT by upchuck (Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson