Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Star-Eating Black Hole May Be Producing Universe's Biggest Blast
ScienceNOW ^ | 7 April 2011 | Yudhijit Bhattacharjee

Posted on 04/10/2011 8:07:18 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Mmogamer; ...

Thanks neverdem.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

61 posted on 04/12/2011 5:55:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...

Thanks neverdem.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

62 posted on 04/12/2011 5:55:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...

Thanks neverdem.

· String Theory Ping List ·
721 posted on 04/24/2007 8:14:42 PM PDT by DocRock
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


63 posted on 04/12/2011 5:55:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

possibly the biggest blast ever seen in the cosmos. When NASA's SWIFT space observatory first spotted it 10 days ago
and SWIFT has been in orbit since 2004. The ozone hole over Antarctica was discovered, and was used for a variety of political ends based on the ridiculous claim that, because the capability of finding it was new, the ozone hole must be new.


64 posted on 04/12/2011 5:58:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Wow! That’s one nasty looking blast.

Glad that thing wasn’t anywhere near here when it went up.


65 posted on 04/12/2011 6:00:19 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Is it just me, or does it look like the cosmos is giving us the middle finger in the picture there ?


66 posted on 04/12/2011 6:25:34 PM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought

It’s not giving us the middle finger, just you. ;’)


67 posted on 04/12/2011 7:55:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lurk
We are in so much trouble when that blast hits us.

If we are seeing the light from that 3.8 billion year old event just now I would imagine that arrival of the larger slower chunks are a long time off.

68 posted on 04/12/2011 8:18:33 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The heresy of heresies was common sense - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
PUt yer clothes back on and go inside, as it's WAY to faint for a human eye to pickup.

So are viruses but I want to know where they are, particularly when I'm unclothed, thank you very much.

69 posted on 04/13/2011 7:10:27 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

D*mn fine graphic, SunkenCiv!!


70 posted on 04/13/2011 7:11:32 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Naked eye observers? When the scientists tell you to look at it through a half inch steel plate, you know it’s not going to be good.

So what I want to do is face the source of the radiation and absorb a part of the event. It is part of the joy of observing the heavens and the associated radiation one cannot see or feel.

71 posted on 04/13/2011 7:17:10 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

it’s all a sham. The universe is electric. There are no black holes.

http://www.holoscience.com/
http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=7qqsr17q


72 posted on 04/13/2011 7:20:16 AM PDT by Skeez (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA; tet68; Elsie
There are no galaxies in the Bible, either. But, if there were, how many could Moses have seen?

As a naked-eye obsever of the cosmos, I can proudly answer that.

One. The Andromeda galaxy. If Moses could see the Pleiades, a well-known asterism in Taurus (the Bull: remember his brother Aaron make a golden calf and there's a really good astronomical/zodiacal reason for the selection but you'll have to figure that one out yourselves, hehheh), he could have most likely seen Andromeda with his naked-eye.

73 posted on 04/13/2011 7:32:09 AM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
"As a naked-eye obsever of the cosmos, I can proudly answer that.

One. The Andromeda galaxy."

~~~~~~~~~

Spotting M31 with my unaided eye is my personal measure of a night with "good seeing" worthy of dragging out the telescope.

You're right: M31 (Andromeda Galaxy) could have been seen by Moses.

But you're also wrong: he could have seen two galaxies:

Moses (like you) also certainly could have seen the Milky Way -- our own galaxy -- "from the inside looking out"...

~~~~~~~~~

The point of my question was, "Even having seen those two galaxies, could he have recognized them (and written about them) for what they are: millions of stars bound into huge spiral structures by gravity (at vast distances from Earth)? No.

~~~~~~~~~

The same holds true for Bishop Ussher: he had no concept of the universe as we (using tools we have made with our God-given talents) now do.

They could get by with writing, reading, and interpreting "Begats" to derive their (mis)interpretation of the age of the Universe. We have no such excuse...

74 posted on 04/13/2011 8:32:09 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; wendy1946
I’d assumed sunspots were plasma-physics dead spots of some sort.

"I believe that assumption is correct."

~~~~~~~~

Actually not...

Sunspots are only slightly cooler than the photosphere. We have to "stop down" or filter sunlight drastically to image the photosphere. In doing so, we also "darken" the suspots a like amount.

If sunspots were isolated and viewable without being surrounded by the photosphere (bright surface), they would appear to be extremely bright to earth-bound viewers...

IOW, sunspots are "dark" only in comparison with the rest of the sun's bright surface..

See "Shown in ultraviolet light, the relatively cool dark regions have temperatures of thousands of degrees Celsius."...

75 posted on 04/13/2011 8:50:46 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA; betty boop
Truly said, dear brother in Christ!

God the Father has revealed Himself in four ways: (1) through the Person of Jesus Christ His only begotten Son, (2) through the Person of the indwelling Holy Spirit, (3) through Scripture, and (4) through Creation both spiritual and physical.

As time goes by we obtain a clearer understanding of His revelations.

God's Name is I AM.

76 posted on 04/13/2011 10:30:49 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

;^)


77 posted on 04/13/2011 11:15:19 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
But you're also wrong: he could have seen two galaxies

As a member of FreeRepublic, I am proud to acknowledge your excellent point.

78 posted on 04/13/2011 12:22:58 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...

Love your tagline, btw.

79 posted on 04/13/2011 12:24:24 PM PDT by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Good thing our dear ruler hadn't heard about this before his glorious speech or he would have blamed Bush for this too.

OTOH, this star is caught up in the same type of disaster scenario as our former Constitutional Republic..."Flitting" too close to marxism in it's communist persona and gradually being eaten up as it falls into a black hole of tyranny.

The outcomes in both cases are the same...No hope of being saved and permanent extinction...

80 posted on 04/13/2011 3:18:57 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson