Posted on 04/21/2011 5:16:03 AM PDT by AAABEST
[SNIP] George Stephanopoulos: Well, I have the president’s certificate right here. It’s certified, it’s got a certification number. It’s got the registrar of the state signed. It’s got a seal on it. And it says “this copy serves as prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.”
Bachmann: Well, then that should settle it.
Stephanopoulos: So it’s over?
Bachmann: That’s what should settle it. I take the president at his word and I think– again I would have no problem and apparently the president wouldn’t, either. Introduce that, we’re done. Move on.
Incorrect.
The States hold the elections and it falls to the States to determine eligibility of each person who appears on their ballots. This is one duty of a secretary of state in each of the 50 States of the Union.
When Nancy Pelosi fraudulently and perjurously certified to the State of Hawaii by letter over her signature as Great Stone Head of the DemonRat Party, she arrogated power not hers, and infringed the sovereignty of Hawaii.
Hawaii was not going to allow Obama on the ballot. On the eve of the election, Obama made a pretended trip to Hawaii to "visit Grandma" because she was ailing -- NOT !!!
Actually, he was there to attend a hearing, the subject of which was his appeal of Hawaii's refusal to list him on their ballot. The meeting was secret, with God knows what said by whom to whom, and the result was that Obama appeared on the ballot of capitulating Hawaii.
The secretaries of state of the 50 States, if this issue continues to be aired by Trump et al., may indeed exclude Barack Obama from their ballots in 2012.
And why not? If he in fact is a huge fraud, why not?
Georgie Clintonopoulos does what MediaRats do best: Ambush.
Michelle should have refused to comment, period. George had a spurious document (Obama's phonied-up COLB) and he knew it -- he waved a fraudulent document at the congresswoman.
States have in fact excluded names based on SoS eligibility determinations.
But I think it is important to advocate that presidential eligibility is ultimately a function of the US Congress. State voters vote for electors, and the name on the ballot is just a convenience for the voter. The name on the ballot has NO legally binding meaning or significance. Most of us vote for electors; and electors vote for the named candidate for the office. The electors are qualified to be electors. The question of eligibility of the presidential candidate is ultimately a US Congressional function.
And the US Congress is not faithful to the constitution.
I didn’t try to fool anyone. In fact, you’ll see that I later spoke about the tactic being used during the recent election.
In any case when it came out doesn’t matter. Its obviously in effect and obviously working.
That was the news that came out before the last election, it has nothing to do with 2012 election...
Other than the fact that you puppets are dancing to the democrat tune as fast as you can.
Now go away boy.
Better report me. LOL
So?...Where does this say that a campaign should be based on the **ONE** issue of Obama’s eligibility? To suggest that I stated that is a deliberate distortion of my post. It is a strawman.
Sorry. I can't defend a strawman argument of **your** creation.
There is nothing that Obama camp would love more than to have the GOP ignore Obama’s eligibility and hidden past. Trump is doing a fine job of jabbing Obama in the nose with the birth certificate issue. The body slam issues ( economic and military) that take him out of the White House will come later in the campaign.
Oh...And, NO! I won't vote for Trump in the primaries but he is doing good work right now in discrediting Obama’s credibility.
She has either been paid off or scared off by the goons from Chicago. He has proved nothing to anybody except that he is a liar and a con artist.
It's a loser issue. It makes you look insane. And THAT is what the Dhims want.
If it's all you got, Oblunder can win from the golf course, and not campaign one damn day.
The guy on the unemployment line could care less about the BC. He wants a job. The woman that has to decide between feeding her kids or putting gas in her car so she can work to feed her kids doesn't care about his BC. People that have to decide what is more important do not think about the BC, they think about the money they don't have or the job they need.
If you do not understand that there are issues of far more importance than the BC, then you are lost in your lunacy.
You try to divine the mind of Obama and his minions and attempt to formulate nebulous motivations for his irrational behavior. There is a term for that: Conspiracy Thinking!
The Article 2 Section 1 defenders are grounded in reality.
The afterbirthers are the conspiracy theorists of the highest order.
“Settled” as in Gore-speak on AGW?
Bachmann?
All I need to know.
“we’re being overrun from all sides”
Which does not detract from the heart of this cancer.
Broken Arrow, FRiend.
Broken Arrow.
That’s true, Bachmann was tarred once before by Chrissie Mathews by needling her into giving them a sound bite they used against her over and over again, like she was some kind of evil witch.
Stephy was looking for the sequel and didn’t get it.
If you do it again there will be no milk and cookies for you.
All I got to say is, The Lord thy GOD of Israel rebuke you..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.