Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facts About Oil
Power Line ^ | 04/28/2008 | John

Posted on 05/01/2011 11:47:02 AM PDT by safetysign

The Democrats are furiously demagoguing energy costs, hoping to dodge the blame for their failed policies. When gas prices spiked in 2008, whom did they blame? Nancy Pelosi attributed high gasoline prices to the "oil men in the White House." This time around, she is staying out of sight.

Other Washington Democrats are blaming the oil companies, and are trying to change the subject to alleged "subsidies"--which, of course, have nothing to do with oil prices. ExxonMobil counters the Democrats' myths with facts:

The part of [our] business that refines and sells gasoline and diesel in the United States represents less than 3 percent - or 3 cents on the dollar - of our total earnings. For every gallon of gasoline, diesel or finished products we manufactured and sold in the United States in the last three months of 2010, we earned a little more than 2 cents per gallon. That's not a typo. Two cents.

Taxes represent around 48 cents per gallon, on the average--twenty-four times as much as ExxonMobil's profit. So who's gouging?

ExxonMobil makes a point that we, too, have made repeatedly over the years. The United States has the world's largest energy resources, but because of our government's foolish policies, American oil companies have access to very little crude oil:

Take a look at the chart at right. ExxonMobil owns less than 1 percent of the world's oil reserves, and it produces less than 3 percent of the world's daily oil supply, so it's really not credible to suggest that we are responsible for world oil prices. [Click to enlarge.]

Photobucket

ExxonMobil actually buys more crude oil than we produce. Last year, we spent $198 billion on crude oil, which we used to make refined products such as gasoline.

Contrary to the administration's claims about "subsidies," ExxonMobil is a huge taxpayer, as are the other privately-owned oil companies. There is a real irony here; the "green" energy that the Obama administration prizes really is subsidized--it represents a net drain on the taxpayers.

Last year, our total taxes and duties to the U.S. government topped $9.8 billion, which includes an income tax expense of $1.6 billion. Over the past five years, we incurred a total U.S. tax expense of almost $59 billion, which is $18 billion more than we earned in the United States during the same period. Critics often try to ignore these facts by saying the oil and gas industry receives "subsidies." But what they really mean is that they want to increase our taxes by taking away long-standing deductions for our industry while leaving these same deductions in place for other sectors of the economy.

So ExxonMobil functions, in economic terms, mainly as a tax collector. Unbelievable. Once again, it is the government that is gouging, not the oil companies.

The Wall Street Journal editorialized this morning:

One of the main so-called subsidies that Mr. Obama wants to eliminate is for the expensing of intangible drilling costs, which has been part of the tax code since its inception. This immediate deduction--rather than amortizing the costs of development over a longer period--provides the capital and cash flow necessary in an industry where the risks are huge and returns are realized over many years, if not decades.

The rest of the items on Mr. Obama's list are tax credits offered to all manufacturers, not just oil and gas. Mr. Boehner's full comments at least revealed the right instincts--namely, proposing to eliminate such carve-outs in return for a lower corporate tax rate as in the Republican budget. The same reform should apply to clean (as well as all other) energy concerns too.

The liberal drive to tax Big Oil is rooted in an ideological commitment to higher energy prices, not consumer relief.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drilling; economy; muslim; oil

1 posted on 05/01/2011 11:47:07 AM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: safetysign

Nazi (No oil for YOU!) Pelosi’s fault.


2 posted on 05/01/2011 11:49:39 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

The Cretin-in-Chief is harping on oil company profits, hoping that there are enough ignorant voters who will swallow this drivel. The measly four billion dollars in depletion allowance the companies get are the same sort of break that farmers and manufacturers get for the depreciation of their equipment.

The C-i-C thinks we don’t know that all taxes will be paid by the consumer anyway. Corporations do not really pay taxes. Taxes are an expense that is built into the cost of the product when it is sold.


3 posted on 05/01/2011 11:56:43 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Contrary to the administration's claims about "subsidies," ExxonMobil is a huge taxpayer, as are the other privately-owned oil companies. There is a real irony here; the "green" energy that the Obama administration prizes really is subsidized--it represents a net drain on the taxpayers.

Do you think this is accidental?

4 posted on 05/01/2011 12:15:15 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 829 of our national holiday from reality. - It's 3 AM, time to arrest Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign; doug from upland; usmcobra; Cindy; G8 Diplomat; AdmSmith; Dog; nuconvert; ...
Facts about oil??? They forgot one:

America EXPORTS, that's right, exports ethanol fuel, AKA corn squeezins, AKA corn liquor. We ship around 1.4 million barrels a month overseas. About 350,000 barrels a month go to the ..........United Arab Emirates. Here's the link to our own gov records of how much oil America exports every month:

http://www.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_expc_a_EP00_EEX_mbbl_m.htm

Go to the drop down under products to see the American exports of various forms of oil.

5 posted on 05/01/2011 12:16:06 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
"Taxes represent around 48 cents per gallon, on the average--twenty-four times as much as ExxonMobil's profit. So who's gouging?"

Both political parties: the Democrats, who feel free to make lots of noise about their tax gouging, and some of the favorite Republican candidates, who've kept the noise in their own states.


6 posted on 05/01/2011 12:23:05 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
the "green" energy that the Obama administration prizes really is subsidized--it represents a net drain on the taxpayers.

Do you think this is accidental?

NO, EVERYTHING Obama does is to hurt America.

7 posted on 05/01/2011 12:23:48 PM PDT by politicianslie (A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
ExxonMobil counters the Democrats' myths with facts

Does it really matter to the Democrats? If anyone has intelligence on this issue, they could see that the problem has nothing to do with the oil companies. So presenting the facts about the oil situation won't do a thing to change the mind of the average democratic troglodyte. If they used facts, logic and reason most of these folks wouldn't be left leaning Democrats in the first place. Nice try ExxonMobil, but you aren't gonna be able to change the minds of many Obama supporters. If they were rational people, they wouldn't have been fooled by Obama in the first place.
8 posted on 05/01/2011 12:27:55 PM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicianslie
Gosh, Ya THINK!?!?!
9 posted on 05/01/2011 12:35:43 PM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 829 of our national holiday from reality. - It's 3 AM, time to arrest Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: safetysign

We have a $1.65 trillion annual deficit, rapidly declining standard of living and civility, millions of illegal immigrants on the dole, open borders, regulations preventing domestic energy production...

and the media parrots back this sub-topic, to target oil companies which have delivered gasoline efficiantly, for my lifetime.

What about big government, big media, big medicine, big groceries, big autos, big government unions, big lawyers, etc????

I want to hear what GOP hopefuls have to say about improving this country.


10 posted on 05/01/2011 12:38:51 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
Who is the gouger?


11 posted on 05/01/2011 12:41:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Under Islam, there is no separation of church and state. The church IS the state.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don’t forget, the majority of the money spent by Exxon for crude oil, went to the OPEC Nations. If that money had remained in the U.S. It could have been used to produce jobs which is the only thing that will bring us out of this depression.


12 posted on 05/01/2011 12:50:46 PM PDT by BooBoo1000 (Never pass up an opportunity to " Shut Up")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: safetysign
When Obama's Fish and Wildlife Service is threatening to shut down oil production in Texas because of a nasty little lizard, despite the pain Americans are experiencing right now no less, it's pretty clear where the blame lies. Barack Obama: citizen? Maybe. Naturally Born Citizen? Possibly. Destroyer of America? Absolutely.
13 posted on 05/01/2011 2:12:52 PM PDT by RC one (Donald Trump-I'm listening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Barack Obama: citizen? Maybe. Naturally Born Citizen? Possibly. Destroyer of America? Absolutely.

Why? Incompetent like Jimmy Carter OR a terrorist like Osama?

The answer to that question is made obvious by actions in Libya, overthrow a government to put Al Qaeda in power. Same solution in Egypt (Muslim Brotherhood).

Our terrorist in chief wants Radical Muslim regimes in Egypt, Libya and Iran. (Hint: Obama said nothing to encourage "rebels/students in Iran).

14 posted on 05/01/2011 2:26:48 PM PDT by politicianslie (A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Thanks gandalftb for the info and the link.
I’ll make your link clickable.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_expc_a_EP00_EEX_mbbl_m.htm


15 posted on 05/01/2011 3:05:44 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks gandalftb.


16 posted on 05/01/2011 5:51:41 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson