Skip to comments.
Federal Employees Started One of Texas Fires But Obama Administration Still Won’t OK Disaster Relief
rwn ^
| May 14, 2011
| Jim Hoft
Posted on 05/14/2011 9:43:22 AM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
full title.
Figures. Federal Employees Started One of Texas Fires But Obama Administration Still Wont OK Disaster Relief
1
posted on
05/14/2011 9:43:24 AM PDT
by
george76
To: george76; dixiechick2000
Here is the article you mentioned DC - thanks - I’m stunned.
2
posted on
05/14/2011 9:50:18 AM PDT
by
WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
(OBL's death is President Bush's fault! ..... thanks GWB!)
To: george76
I didn’t start any of the fires.
3
posted on
05/14/2011 9:53:25 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: george76
Zer0 has a special angst for Texas.
4
posted on
05/14/2011 9:55:02 AM PDT
by
ChiMark
To: george76
I guess the implication is, “Think hard about the likelihood of a Gulf Coast hurricane before you vote Republican!!!”
5
posted on
05/14/2011 10:00:39 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: george76
I think the ATF idiots who did this need to be held personally liable for their stupidity in criminal proceedings.
6
posted on
05/14/2011 10:01:36 AM PDT
by
jospehm20
To: JimSEA
I think the lesson is that states need to think long and hard and secession. It may be the only way to preserve liberty at this point.
7
posted on
05/14/2011 10:06:14 AM PDT
by
Clump
(the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
To: ChiMark
This should show everyone that voted for him what happens when you cross him. A president that turns against his own people should be removed from office. A president that sends billions of dollars out of his country while his people are suffering, should be removed from office. A president that sends money to his country’s enemies, should be removed from office. A president that will not protect his country’s borders, should be removed from office.
8
posted on
05/14/2011 10:06:25 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: george76
Does the regime give any official reason why they won’t,, or are they just stonewalling it?
9
posted on
05/14/2011 10:12:48 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
To: RC2
“A president that sends billions of dollars out of his country while his people are suffering, should be removed from office. A president that sends money to his countrys enemies, should be removed from office. A president that will not protect his countrys borders, should be removed from office.”
George W. Bush meets these criteria as well as does William Jefferson Clinton. Clinton was impeached but not for these reasons — perhaps he would have been convicted if he had been impeached for these reasons.
The Republicans control the House of Representatives and have the votes to impeach the sitting President. The absence of any action on their part to do so suggests they perceive the actions he is taking are within the scope of his job responsibilities.
10
posted on
05/14/2011 10:13:48 AM PDT
by
Soul of the South
(When times are tough the tough get going.)
To: ChiMark
Your correct sir. Red state, and George Bush lives there. Pay back
11
posted on
05/14/2011 10:22:19 AM PDT
by
reefdiver
("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
To: Soul of the South
Does not impeachment require consent and/or agreement of the Senate? I don’t know.
12
posted on
05/14/2011 10:23:27 AM PDT
by
RC2
To: george76
Bet if Austin and El Paso were ablaze he would drain Dallas and Houston to put their fires out.
If the Mexican Army invaded America,Obama would set up defensive lines in CA,AZ,NM,OK,AK and LA.
13
posted on
05/14/2011 10:23:47 AM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("In 2012,the race card is going to make folks say one thing and vote another.")
To: george76
when Obama can guarantee the electoral votes from Texas, he will give them federal assistance. it comes with a price.
14
posted on
05/14/2011 10:26:15 AM PDT
by
tioga
(2012 - the year Obama gets slapped down....coming soon.)
To: RC2
Does not impeachment require consent and/or agreement of the Senate? I dont know.No.
15
posted on
05/14/2011 10:27:43 AM PDT
by
houeto
(Rev. 13. [7] And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them:)
To: reefdiver
Probably has more to do with Perry punking Obama out and the channel 8 reporter who failed to show due benevolence.
16
posted on
05/14/2011 10:27:57 AM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: george76
17
posted on
05/14/2011 10:28:59 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: RC2
Impeachment is up to the House—removal from office is then up to the senate.
After Clinton was impeached—only the 2nd President in history to suffer the infamy—the RINOs and Liberals in the senate made deals to ensure that the most secure or distant from reelection voted to NOT remove the perjurer from the office he so badly sullied.
A slim majority voted to keep him in office.
Lindsey Graham,who at first headed the impeachment trial in the House,saw the light and then became a RINO himself.
18
posted on
05/14/2011 10:31:04 AM PDT
by
Happy Rain
("In 2012,the race card is going to make folks say one thing and vote another.")
To: george76
It’ is money that belongs to the tax payers, not zero.
Where is the gutless congress.
19
posted on
05/14/2011 10:43:56 AM PDT
by
devistate one four
(United states code 10.311 Militia Kimber CDP II .45 OORAH! TET68)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson