Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Vanity] I want to like Herman Cain, really.
Vanity ^ | 5-20-11 | Libertarianinexile

Posted on 05/20/2011 9:04:00 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile

I have seen a couple of posts on here regarding Herman Cain, and heard him on Neal Boortz' show lots of times. Boortz really seems to love the guy. And I am inclined to like anyone who is pro-Fair-Tax more than someone who is for continuing the current income tax mess, which costs America far more productivity than any sales tax that replaced it ever could.

But I haven't heard Cain talk about some controversial areas where I may well have concerns about his views on the Constitution. And where I have heard him talk on the issues, he's sometimes said troubling things.

First, while he's talked about race, he has not once stated outright that he would end affirmative action policies where he could. He's danced like a Romney on this where I have seen him speak or write about it, like he did here: http://www.boortz.com/Player/100950001/ http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/2004/04/28/op_413767.shtml

A candidate's position on affirmative action must be unequivocable, "I'm against it." No "we need to be fair" or "considering race might be okay" or any of that crap. It's unconstitutional, racist, sexist and wrong. Why hasn't Cain said this?

Second, I don't know why Cain's dancing on foreign policy. If he doesn't have a plan for Afghanistan, fine. Who really is sure what to do about Afghanistan? But what would his overarching sense of the United States' military role be? That we must patrol the Red Sea and Persian Gulf, militarily stop Iran from getting the bomb, intervene preemptively--or not? That we should be stationing troops in Yugoslavia and Korea and Diego Garcia--or not? During the debate he wanted to "set up a committee" or study stuff, but that is not how to run your military or state department. I didn't agree with W on everything, but after the China spy plane mess, W got it together and had a plan when it came to foreign intervention: "Have a strong military and use it, or make it clear you can and will." Clear policy from the White House, unlike the constant finger in the wind of President Pollbama's administration, is crucial for our businesses and citizens because it makes clear to us and our opponents as to what we will do to protect our countrymen and interests abroad. Pick a course now, because it makes a difference to some of us, Herman.

Third, Cain was pro-TARP back in the day. What made TARP Constitutional? Why was he against auditing the Fed and then for it? Amd where does he come up with this stuff about TARP being a net payoff for taxpayers? See here:

http://004eeb5.netsolhost.com/hc133.htm

He comes across as a real bankster. I don't like that.

Fourth, what's Cain really think we should do about illegal immigration? I get the impression he wants to leave deporting these illegals to the states, and this is one area where the federal government SHOULD be involved. Building a border fence and deporting illegals are two things states shouldn't have to do.

Fifth, is he a federalist and constitutionalist, or really just a unitary goverment social conservative? Where does he stand on Gonzales v. Reich? What about the Commerce Clause and where it stops?

Sixth, how does any conservative support income redistributionism? He's come right out and said he's for the food stamp program. How does that jive with being a conservative?

Finally, and this is what perplexes me the most, no one has asked him why he supported a labor lawyer Democrat over a Republican for mayor of Omaha way back when he lived in Nebraska. Now, I don't know the whole story. Maybe Hal Daub (the GOP candidate) was a real RINO back then. But I doubt it from his record, and I don't know anyone conservative who would vote for a Democrat even over the worst Republican. Even the folks like me who couldn't stomach a vote for McCain didn't do something as stupid as voting for Obama.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; boortz; cain; philosophy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last
Before the primaries, conservatives deserve answers, not speeches that commit nothing but hot air. Hate me for pissing in the petunias if you want, but I am not jumping on any bandwagons without knowing where the band is gonna be led. I asked the same kind of questions about Huckabee, Palin, and Rudy McRomney.
1 posted on 05/20/2011 9:04:02 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

The country is dying, and your #1 issue listed is “affirmative action”? Are you serious?


2 posted on 05/20/2011 9:06:56 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Dear Lord, Please judge Barack Hussein Obama for betraying Israel, and not the whole nation. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

He’s come right out and said he’s for the food stamp program. How does that jive with being a conservative?


Because there are people who actually need food stamps at one time or another.

Cain would not be “The Food Stamp president” as someone recently called 0bama.


3 posted on 05/20/2011 9:09:12 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

I think you raise fair questions, which should be answered during debates and the primary vetting process.

I’m excited about him because I pretty much agree with what he has espoused so far. However, I fully expect that people will dig further into his positions and air them all for the world to see.

Should be an interesting year!


4 posted on 05/20/2011 9:10:09 PM PDT by USArmySpouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Really stretching there? It could be worse, he could be TrumpPaulRomneyNewtJohnson. Instead, he is... gosh, only 98% Conservative and he hasn’t answered some questions the way you want.. and another person ignoring he was strongly against TARP when it was launched. A lot of people and sites are twisting his one statement about one part of TARP made back when everyone was debating what to do.


5 posted on 05/20/2011 9:11:33 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

I like him and I am going to vote for him. We must STOP “winner take all0” all primaries or this socialist from Massachusetts is going to do what McAmnesty did to our party. Every candidate should get their percentage of the delegates earned. Don’t let these liberals steal our party again. We will not vote for SOCIALISM!! Get these Globalists communists out of our party.


6 posted on 05/20/2011 9:14:37 PM PDT by delbertt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears

“The country is dying, and your #1 issue listed is “affirmative action”? Are you serious?”

The country is dying, and the #1 issue you have with my post is the order of my questions? Are you serious?


7 posted on 05/20/2011 9:14:50 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“Because there are people who actually need food stamps at one time or another.”

I need a car. Can I have the government tax you to pay for car stamps?


8 posted on 05/20/2011 9:15:50 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

HE WILL BE ANNOUNCING TOMORROW AT 12 IN ATLANTA...THEN THE ‘GAMES’ BEGIN AND YOU WILL ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW AND THEM SOME


9 posted on 05/20/2011 9:18:34 PM PDT by merryberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Right on. Too many conservatives will vote against an otherwise solid conservative candidate because they disagree on one issue. It’s arrogant and not too smart.


10 posted on 05/20/2011 9:18:34 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: merryberry

Good news! Cain will weed out more RINO’s than anyone else.


11 posted on 05/20/2011 9:20:07 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unkus

What gets me is they keep repeating that TARP thing, ignoring how vocal he was against it. The article they posted mentions TARP no where in there, only one small aspect of what became part of TARP. It is almost like it is a talking point coming from somewhere.


12 posted on 05/20/2011 9:20:16 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
Photobucket
13 posted on 05/20/2011 9:21:47 PM PDT by RS_Rider (I hate Illinois Nazis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

It is almost like it is a talking point coming from somewhere.


You’re right. It’s kind of Troll’ish. Rush calls them Seminar Callers.


14 posted on 05/20/2011 9:22:56 PM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Also you can scroll down to 8:55 To ZOGBY POLL STUNNER..and the first or second post is a thumbnail autobiography of Mr. Cain


15 posted on 05/20/2011 9:24:06 PM PDT by merryberry (Yes we Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I can see how resoundingly you addressed the issues I raised there. I’ve completely changed my mind, he’s 100% conservative because you say so. Let me go get a rug so I can pray facing Cain.

[/sarcasm]

Look, George Soros is a money-making businessman. Barack Obama is black. Bill Clinton was from the South. Al Sharpton gives a good speech. I don’t care about that. want to know the guy I vote for is a principled conservative. You brush off these issues as him “not answering some questions the way [I] want”...but someone with principles beyond “I wanna get elected” COULD and WOULD answer them because they’d have firm beliefs, be able to enunciate them, and be able to educate people who are undecided middle types. If Cain can’t, he’s not going to be a good candidate anyway.

And I forgot to mention Kelo as another SCOTUS opinion where I’d like to hear from candidates. Where do they stand on eminent domain?


16 posted on 05/20/2011 9:25:02 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: USArmySpouse

“I think you raise fair questions, which should be answered during debates and the primary vetting process...I’m excited about him because I pretty much agree with what he has espoused so far. However, I fully expect that people will dig further into his positions and air them all for the world to see...Should be an interesting year!

I hope these questions are answered. Too many candidates get to skate through on the hard issues during the primaries, in my experience. And the ones who don’t address the issues have in my lifetime always turned to big government after their election.


17 posted on 05/20/2011 9:28:33 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

from Wikipedia
He is a former deputy chairman (1992–94) and chairman (1995–96) of the civilian board of directors to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

That explains his reluctance to audit the Fed. If he were to come out and renounce his ties to them, I’d be ok with him.


18 posted on 05/20/2011 9:31:47 PM PDT by LinnKeyes2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: merryberry

“HE WILL BE ANNOUNCING TOMORROW AT 12 IN ATLANTA...THEN THE ‘GAMES’ BEGIN AND YOU WILL ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW AND THEM SOME”

I hope you’re right. But to make one actual personal comment about the guy, he still sounds a little too much like Maya Angelou for me to ever fall entirely in love with him as a candidate. I have a similar problem with Palin’s, Mark Levin’s, and Mike Savage’s accents, because they simply grow irritating after a while to me.


19 posted on 05/20/2011 9:32:07 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: delbertt

“I like him and I am going to vote for him. We must STOP “winner take all0” all primaries or this socialist from Massachusetts is going to do what McAmnesty did to our party. Every candidate should get their percentage of the delegates earned. Don’t let these liberals steal our party again. We will not vote for SOCIALISM!! Get these Globalists communists out of our party.”

I agree entirely. I’m just not sure yet Cain fits as a candidate who is a constitutionalist conservative, which is why I’m asking the questions I am.


20 posted on 05/20/2011 9:34:16 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Without a doubt. And the best part about it he will do it in PLAIN speak and right to the point. I’ve not seen him fudge yet and if he can be on his toes like he was in the debate he could be unstoppable..


21 posted on 05/20/2011 9:36:22 PM PDT by merryberry (Yes we Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You’re asking relevant questions, LibertarianInExile. I’m interesting in what Cain has to say. He has my attention. I would like to hear his platform concerning the Constitution, abortion, embryonic stem sell research, states rights, US sovereignty, Israel, religious rights, free trade, flat tax, marriage, SCOTUS, labor unions, public education, our military, border security, foreign policy, just to name a few.


22 posted on 05/20/2011 9:38:04 PM PDT by This Just In (In America, RINO's belong in zoo's, not public office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I think Cain will be valuable in the campaign trail. He's a showman and a salesman and says a lot of things most couldn't get away with - not would dare try. He will drive the libs and media apoplectic - they can’t effectively use the race card.

That said, he does not have the experience we need to bring this country back from the brink. He has no foreign affairs experience or contacts, for one,and that is going to be crucial with the ME aflame and Israel in the cross hairs.

And there's little chance he'd win against obamama

However, this man below has the knowledge, on all fronts, and the backbone. No one intimidates him. He knows who our enemies are, foreign and domestic, he knows the Constitution, the Bible - and is much admired by the Israelis. (They feel about him over there as many of here about Netanyahu.)

I'm praying that, by fall, this man will be convinced to run.
Latest of Lt. Col West's statements - he says it up straight and backs down to no one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGIZtD4ufFo

“I am sick and tired of this class warfare, this Marxist, demagogic rhetoric that is coming from the President of the United States of America....Third world dictator arrogance...” Lt Col Allen WEst, Congressman

on Israel and Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mY8tVkaDqYw&feature=related

at CPAC “NOW is the TIME

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mf33LIEt-g

on illegal immigration

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkGQmCZjJ0k

He doesn't speak “PC”

“Don’t blow sunshine up my butt and tell me it’s warm and fuzzy...put down the mike and go home!” (PC be damned!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MZx38i6iYs

Revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7RKIpufStQ

Just look at all the different clips of him - and picture obumbles trying to debate him. Col. WEst would shred him - on every subject. We’d probably see a narcissistic meltdown.

23 posted on 05/20/2011 9:39:54 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (watch the other hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Notfor nothing but I just went to your profile and ,my virus blocker went nuts


24 posted on 05/20/2011 9:40:25 PM PDT by merryberry (Yes we Cain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“Right on. Too many conservatives will vote against an otherwise solid conservative candidate because they disagree on one issue. It’s arrogant and not too smart.”

Just curious: how many issues must a conservative disagree with a candidate on before voting against that candidate becomes not arrogant and smart?

I won’t vote for anyone who hasn’t enunciated opinions on the issues of the day, especially re: Gonzales and Kelo. During my lifetime, candidates seem to get a free pass on addressing what they think about the role of the federal government. When they don’t have to answer, they inevitably do come out for big government when the issue arises. To some of us, it’s not good enough any more to have elections about flag burning and “change” and who looks surprised at a %$#@%@ supermarket scanner.


25 posted on 05/20/2011 9:41:19 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

“That said, he does not have the experience we need to bring this country back from the brink. He has no foreign affairs experience or contacts, for one,and that is going to be crucial with the ME aflame and Israel in the cross hairs.”

I don’t know that you need foreign affairs experience to lead this country. You do need a vision of where America fits in the world. I don’t think you get that by committee. I haven’t said I can’t vote for the guy—I just want him to address the questions and issues, as I would ask of any candidate. What bugs the crap out of me is that these are issues and yet there are plenty of folks here that assume it’s maligning the guy to ask him to address them before the primaries get rolling. It’s fair to ask a candidate where he stands and why.


26 posted on 05/20/2011 9:44:24 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

you want “a candidate who is a constitutionalist conservative?”

Here ya go

Revolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M

While you’re in YouTube - take a peak at any and all his other clips

We need BACKBONE AND EXPERIENCE.

Cain’s a good showman but we need more. We’re heading over a cliff


27 posted on 05/20/2011 9:45:42 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (watch the other hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile
I wanted to like Herman Cain until I heard he supported TARP & the bailouts.

If he is such a financial genius why did he support that theft?

All I have heard to answer that question so far from his "supporters" are attacks that I am a "Ron Paul supporter".

Anybody who lies about this is probably lying about everything else.
28 posted on 05/20/2011 9:46:04 PM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LinnKeyes2000

“from Wikipedia...He is a former deputy chairman (1992–94) and chairman (1995–96) of the civilian board of directors to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City...That explains his reluctance to audit the Fed. If he were to come out and renounce his ties to them, I’d be ok with him.”

Yeah, he’s got Fed ties in a big way. That doesn’t sour me on him as much as his willingness to let them skate from public audits does. What’s up with that attitude? It’s not like they are some standalone wholly private entity—they set our nation’s monetary policy, for pete’s sake!


29 posted on 05/20/2011 9:47:45 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: merryberry

“Notfor nothing but I just went to your profile and ,my virus blocker went nuts”

Probably because it had to work hard looking at all the content on there. I just checked my profile with McAfee’s site advisor—it didn’t find anything bad. And if there were something virus-y about my profile, the problem would be with FR.


30 posted on 05/20/2011 9:52:15 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You eat your car?


31 posted on 05/20/2011 9:53:35 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

I am a Cain supporter along with a few others. Your questions do need an answer/response from Cain and as well from all other would be POTUSA candidates.


32 posted on 05/20/2011 9:55:30 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Yeah, I’m serious. It’s amazing that you bring up “affirmative action” as a priority at all. Look around you. The country is dying, and that’s a priority with you. Astounding.


33 posted on 05/20/2011 9:57:25 PM PDT by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Dear Lord, Please judge Barack Hussein Obama for betraying Israel, and not the whole nation. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

People are so used to flat out attacks on their candidates and into the attack-back-quick mindset that quite a few instantly post back insults, on seeing any post that is at all questioning of their candidate. It’s not hard to get into that mode after you’ve been slammed a few times. But I’m sorry that you’ve dealt with it.

I thought pretty hard about TARP myself, but ultimately came down against it for the same reason I was against “Cash for Clunkers” and the new housing grants. It’s other people’s money. Cain evidently didn’t have that view from the getgo. That made me want to ask questions about his bedrock principles.


34 posted on 05/20/2011 10:00:12 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“Because there are people who actually need food stamps at one time or another.”

I’d like to see a breakdown of the numbers of people who only use food stamps as a temporary fix and move on to being able to provide for themselves vs. those who are lifetime abusers.


35 posted on 05/20/2011 10:01:32 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aria

“You eat your car?”

Oh, I’m sorry I confused you. /sarc

But to address your ‘funny’ comment, I need a car to GET to food. So it’s as important as food. So why are car stamps not provided to me on your dime?

Or did you want to see if you could sidestep the question again, and avoid the issue, which is that it’s still redistribution? It is still taking people’s money away at the point of a gun, in order to give that money to other people the government thinks are more deserving.


36 posted on 05/20/2011 10:06:30 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Ditto. With real unemployment at 17 percent food stamps have prevented Americans from hitting the streets and rioting. Call it a necessary stability program. So far crime has not hit the ceiling despite the high unemployment. I think food stamps played a role in it. But if the gov runs out of money, blood will be running in the streets.


37 posted on 05/20/2011 10:13:34 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears

A question about affirmative action, a question that actually does much to highlight the candidate’s missing views regarding the plain language of the Constitution, is somehow lacking in gravitas to you. The issues we face as a country that is “dying” arise because of our government’s failure to adhere to clear constitutional limitations, be that in providing equal opportunity under law to all citizens, or in taxing Americans preferentially to grow leviathan. If you can’t see that the broader issue of interpretation of the plain language of the Constitution is a priority, I guess we have no reason to trade posts, and you should just go back to the talking points for Cain.

Maybe you should tell me he’s an entrepreneur and a great speaker a few more times until I get with the program. Or you could stick with the “your priorities are out of whack” posts. That’s certainly been an effective way to distract from your candidate’s inability to clearly address the issue of affirmative action in a way that states his adherence to the plain language of the Constitution. /sarc


38 posted on 05/20/2011 10:18:29 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

“I’d like to see a breakdown of the numbers of people who only use food stamps as a temporary fix and move on to being able to provide for themselves vs. those who are lifetime abusers.”

I’d like to see a breakdown of the numbers of dollars spent on the food stamp program and the number of dollars actually reaching people who need food. But I’d also like to see where in the Constitution it says the federal government can forcibly take money away from Peter to feed Paul.


39 posted on 05/20/2011 10:21:03 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I think West would be an awesome Secy of Defense - it takes a lot of people to run an Administration (not as many as the present one, but...), and I’m interested in hearing about some of the cabinet picks these candidates would like to nominate. Cart before the horse, perhaps...but I’d like to hear about their Dream Team


40 posted on 05/20/2011 10:25:03 PM PDT by DrinkDeep (Drink Deep the water of life - Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You can live without a car - can’t live without food ;)


41 posted on 05/20/2011 10:26:16 PM PDT by DrinkDeep (Drink Deep the water of life - Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You can try but a car is not the same as food - which of course you know.

No one will win an election campaigning against food stamps.


42 posted on 05/20/2011 10:27:41 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DrinkDeep; Aria

What language in the Constitution says the federal government can take from Peter to give to Paul, because Paul needs that money? There is no Constitutional difference between taking money from me to spend on a federal food stamp program, and taking money from me to spend on a treadmill for Mark Mangino’s fat fanny. Yet we don’t have a federal treadmill program...yet.


43 posted on 05/20/2011 10:36:47 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (When Republicans don't vote conservative, conservatives don't vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Study of history should never be ignored. All empires in history starting with the Roman Empire & including the Third Reich have one thing in common...they ALL ended in destruction of the empires, and the main reason was military campaigns in foreign lands, debt & debasement of currency.

With $14.32 Trillion in debt, and $1.5+ trillion in yearly deficits, the indisputable fact is that we are headed in the same direction if we do not curb our adventures in foreign lands, and real soon, like right now.


44 posted on 05/20/2011 10:37:06 PM PDT by repub4ever1 (Capitalism is not perfect, but it beats all other systems hands down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

You have to pick your battles. Battling against food stamps is a sure loser.

Not that the program is perfect because it isn’t. But I also know people who were desperate for a while and this got them through.

My son met people in Malawai who know what it’s like dirt when there is nothing else. People in Korea eat grass and starve to death. You really think the United States of America should tell hungry citizens that it’s their problem? There would be a communist backlash that you’d like a whole lot less than the food stamps.


45 posted on 05/20/2011 10:48:41 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Well, speaking as someone who has used food banks in the past.

I don’t have any sympathy. None, whatsoever. I work hard to make sure I have enough money to be able to feed myself. There have been hard periods, but people in general were kind enough to help me out of a difficult spot. And I have helped others out too.

We don’t need food stamps. Imagine how charitable people would be if they saw that someone was truly in need of food, and the program did not exist? Do you think that they would be more likely to help that person as their neighbour? I think so.

Food stamps is a huge bloat and just like any government program, performs far worse than private charities. Or people helping each other.


46 posted on 05/20/2011 10:55:07 PM PDT by BenKenobi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Ping


47 posted on 05/20/2011 11:07:34 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

I agree the program is far from perfect - I’ve heard that for some people the food stamps are used like money for whatever.

However, seems to me charity could be iffy at times. I’m glad people helped you out. I’d help anyone who is hungry as would most decent people - but clearly, there are those who would not.


48 posted on 05/20/2011 11:11:22 PM PDT by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Unlike the democrats and their lapdog media organizations, republicans actually vet their candidates... if the left hasn’t destroyed them already... so you shouldn’t worry.
Things are just getting started.


49 posted on 05/20/2011 11:16:25 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

not saying I disagree with you - being widowed with four kids put me on the fs dole for a while, and I was grateful it was there when I needed it. Aside from that one long year I’ve paid Into the system for about 40 years...unlike many lifelong enrollees.

I think it’s a corrupt system, and I wouldn’t mind seeing it go. The USDA subsidizes the farmers, then they raise the amt. of food stamps they give out to cover the cost - so the taxpayer ends up forking out twice. It used to be pretty hard to get in the program, but not today.


50 posted on 05/20/2011 11:33:33 PM PDT by DrinkDeep (Drink Deep the water of life - Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson