Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manitoba eyes new dam in $4 billion hydro deal with U.S.
Winnipeg Free Press via Calagary Herald ^ | May 26, 2011 | Bruce Owen

Posted on 05/26/2011 10:54:27 AM PDT by thackney

A combined power deal between Minnesota and Wisconsin will kick off the construction of a new dam in northern Manitoba.

The deal is worth $4 billion and will see Manitoba Hydro sell 475 megawatts southward starting in 2015.

To meet that demand Hydro will have to build the $5.6-billion Keeyask Generation Station on the lower Nelson River 175 kilometres northeast of Thompson.

“This is the largest dollar sale of exports that we’ve had in the history of Manitoba Hydro in absolute dollar terms,” Premier Greg Selinger said Wednesday. “We like to think of it as Manitoba’s oil, but more sustainable and certainly greener.”

Selinger also said Hydro continues to work on another export power sales to Wisconsin.

If that 500-megawatt deal happens, it would lead to the construction of the Conawapa Generating Station.

The new agreements still need regulatory approval.

Last year Manitoba Hydro signed a deal worth $3 billion to sell between 375 and 500 megawatts to Xcel Energy of Minneapolis for 10 years starting in 2015.

The Minnesota Power deal comes as Manitoba’s Public Utilities Board weighs the risks of Hydro spending $20 billion over the next decade to build the Keeyask and Conawapa stations on the upper Nelson River and the Bipole III transmission line.

The two facilities would add another 1,930 megawatts of electricity to Hydro’s system to use in the growing domestic market and to export to Minnesota and also Wisconsin. Hydro’s new $1.3 billion Wuskwatim project on the Burntwood River is to generate 200 megawatts starting next year.

The new deal also calls for the inclusion of a “wind storage” provision that allows Minnesota Power to transmit electric energy northward from its wind farms in North Dakota when wind production is high or electric loads are low.

When Minnesota Power transmits power northward, Manitoba Hydro will absorb it into its system, storing it like a “rechargeable battery.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Minnesota; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: electricity; energy; hydro; wind

1 posted on 05/26/2011 10:54:30 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

So Canada is building dams and we are building wind mills. It will be interesting to see how much wind power is exactly exported to Canada for pump storage. I bet the Canadian’s accepted that deal because they know that there will be very little of it. Keeping wind mills running in the frozen north isn’t easy. You got to keep them heated when the wind doesn’t blow. When the wind blows to hard..or ice formss..you gotta stop them. The net output will be very low. From a personal point of view, investing in Canadian oil resources or just the EWC is a good bet. They have pursued oil sands, offshore oil, artic oil and gas and pipelines to get it to us. They will get rich off our $4 gas.


2 posted on 05/26/2011 11:10:39 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

They already ARE getting rich off of $4 gas. Alberta is booming. Fort MacMurray has become an overnight boom town of 60,000.

Good for them as they have had the common sense to tell their enviro-agitators to take a hike and are developing their own energy resources.


3 posted on 05/26/2011 11:12:53 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
So Canada is building dams and we are building wind mills.

One of the smaller things the Governor is Wisconsin is doing here, is making all but impossible to build more wind generation.
4 posted on 05/26/2011 11:25:49 AM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

LOL

Muast be nice to be in Canada. IF we tried to build a dam here in AK, we would be up to our armpits in lawyers and ‘activists’ trying to stop the permiting, let alone actually building the thing.

My grandkids are doomed......


5 posted on 05/26/2011 11:27:43 AM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
looks like another Peter Kiewit project, they have built most of James Bay and Hydro Quebec, and they in the neighborhood, so...
6 posted on 05/26/2011 11:29:33 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

You don’t believe the Susitna dam will go through?

http://www.newsminer.com/view/full_story/12850852/article-Alaska-Senate-clears-Susitna-dam-plan?instance=home_news_window_left_top_1


7 posted on 05/26/2011 11:32:07 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

****IF we tried to build a dam here in AK, *****

Wasn’t there a plan, years ago, to build a huge one on the Yukon river or the one at Fairbanks? I remember reading that the lake formed would be HUGE!

So it was abandoned.


8 posted on 05/26/2011 11:38:25 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name. See my home page, if you dare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Perhaps you are thinking of the Susitna?

This project has been proposed and rejected many times going back to the 1940s.

http://enr.construction.com/news/powerIndus/archives/080611.asp


9 posted on 05/26/2011 11:43:18 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Perhaps you are thinking of the Susitna?

This project has been proposed and rejected many times going back to the 1940s.

http://enr.construction.com/news/powerIndus/archives/080611.asp


10 posted on 05/26/2011 11:43:18 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Not in anybodies lifetime. I don’t even see why it is being considered.

The Chakachamna projects make musch more sense.
It could replace the gas-fired Beliga plant (which is getting old) (330MW), NO DAM, and the hyfro plant would only be 50 miles from the existing feed to the railbelt, avoiding the cost of all new infrastructure.

TDX has already loked at the site and has recommendations.

The fight will be between Big Coal (or at least alaska big coal) vs hydro.

Had the State issued permits, construction would be underway now......


11 posted on 05/26/2011 11:46:59 AM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
I used to wonder about the proposed dam at Devil's Canyon. Beside Steve Mahay and a few suicidal rafters, who would be bothered by that location?
12 posted on 05/26/2011 11:51:54 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Green Peace

Serria Club

Center for (no development in AK) bio-diversity...

You know - the usual supects.


13 posted on 05/26/2011 12:00:06 PM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Enviros exist in spades in Canada but maybe the legal system is less inclined to accomodate them.


14 posted on 05/26/2011 12:38:29 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson