What a dick.
Let's not get overwrought, Jonah. We're not talking about my 10-year-old here.
I’m glad the NR finally (belatedly) covered it. I wonder if Rush will cover it? Drudge hasn’t. I am disappointed with the so-called conservative media so far. It is basically “only” bloggers who have covered it it depth. There very possibly may have been crimes committed and it’s treated as a joke or ignored.
new tag line
Ok, let’s just keep our heads on this and remember, it’s the seriousness of the CHARGE that matters, not if he’s guilty or not.
Are you guys apologizing for Weiner? You guys think it’s fine for a sitting congressman to be sending wiener pics to girls? Just because he’s a Dem?
That was weiner’s skinny wiener and thighs. He switched to “prank” because his defense lawyer has told him it would be a felony to report a false crime. Weiner needs to be grilled over this.
As long as DOJ is not involved in the investgation.
what would sharia law say in this case? can the wife do some cutting on the weiner?
‘I don’t think this is a colossal scandal.....”
Then what is it Jonah?...toe tapping wasn’t that big? A picture of a NY congressman with his shirt off wasn’t that big? Where do you say it is a big deal you knucklehead?
Jonah Jonah Johan, you are forgetting to which party weener belongs.
There will be no consequences to his perverted behaviour.
Oh yes I agree I want to know what kind of awful person would send a photo of an obivious sexually excited man to a young college student using his account.If it were my daughter I’d want to know exactly who the prevent was who did this no matter who they are and I think it is serious enough that it is not a prank that should be overlooked.I don’t care how “small” Weiner thinks the “issue” is it is collassal to find out just who the pervent is.
The media outpets are being very selective on this - it’s very troubling.
But the story itself is a real hoot.
Weiner’s weiner!
All that remains is for the experts to come forward with proof that the photo was doctored. ha ha
outpets = outlets
although “pets” might be appropriate
I read one story (can not say if it is true) that the girl that was sent the “twitter” has been busy closing her accounts and removing her name from every were...Why, unless there is more to this then the Weiner is saying
UPDATE IV (4:10 p.m. ET): OK, now we have a very significant development: In March, porn star/stripper Ginger Lee boasted that she had received a Twitter direct message (DM) from Rep. Weiner.
She is a fan of Weiner, and raved that getting this private communication from the Democratic congressman was “like a DM from Buddha.”
This is what I believe lawyers would call “pattern evidence,” and if anybody in the major media thinks they can safely ignore this story much longer, they’re wrong.
http://theothermccain.com/2011/05/29/msm-starting-to-cover-weinergate/
UPDATE VIII: Weiner spokesman in an e-mail to the New York Daily News: “This is intended to be a distraction, and we’re not going to let it become one. Anthony’s accounts were obviously hacked. He doesn’t know the person named by the hacker, and we will be consulting on what steps to take next.”
He’s a guilty little pervert. You can draw that conclusion from his arrogant attitude on TV.
Let me do the investigation. I would recognize it!