Skip to comments.
Nixon vetoes voter-ID and early-voting legislation (Missouri)
The Kansas City Star ^
| 06/17/2011 11:30PM
| By JASON NOBLE
Posted on 06/18/2011 8:53:43 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Outlaw Woman
Would an override be possible?
To: Outlaw Woman
Put a photo on their EBT cards.
22
posted on
06/18/2011 9:41:13 AM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
To: Outlaw Woman
The ONLY reason to oppose voter ID, is to SUPPORT VOTER FRAUD!
23
posted on
06/18/2011 9:41:41 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: ilovesarah2012
"Yet we need an ID to get a job, cash a check, to buy cigarettes, alcohol (which Im sure the dem voters do), open a bank account, and a lot of other things. But asking someone to show an ID to vote would disinfranchise them. The dems promote voter fraud - simple as that."
24
posted on
06/18/2011 9:44:17 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(Hey Tea Party folks - what about Social Security reform?)
To: wk4bush2004
Republicans are in control but...we have RINOS. Nixon vetoed the redistricting map and that veto was overridden so..hopefully that will happen in this case.
25
posted on
06/18/2011 9:50:08 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: Outlaw Woman
A Democrat in favor of enabling voter fraud?? Gee...seems IMPOSSIBLE, doesn’t it!!!
To: smokingfrog
27
posted on
06/18/2011 9:51:04 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: Outlaw Woman
The Great State of Misery!
28
posted on
06/18/2011 9:52:52 AM PDT
by
PoloSec
( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
To: G Larry
29
posted on
06/18/2011 9:54:14 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: cripplecreek
You really have to wonder why the Republican leadership has not made this a big issue in the last dozen elections. I guess the real answer to that question is too unthinkable since only two reasons come quickly to mind, stupidity, or complicity.
30
posted on
06/18/2011 10:03:32 AM PDT
by
itsahoot
(I Stand with Sarah Palin)
To: Outlaw Woman
“...disenfranchise voters... “
This is code speak that means “Stop Democrat voting fraud.”
If they can get some kind of ID to get food stamps, public housing, SSI, Medicaid..., they can show an ID for voting. If they work, they should already have an ID. The only “disenfranchised voters” are illegals who shouldn’t be voting, and military personnel who Democrats manage to exclude.
31
posted on
06/18/2011 10:09:58 AM PDT
by
pallis
To: Oldpuppymax
All Dems should be run out on a rail (even the dead ones)
32
posted on
06/18/2011 10:23:59 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: PoloSec
I’ll take my state over your dumbass state anyday
33
posted on
06/18/2011 10:26:12 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: pallis
Actually it is code speak for allowing fraud. and you’re right on about the ID. It’s all a huge smoke screen just like “It’s for the children” BS. Make it sound like they are doing the ‘righteous’ thing.
34
posted on
06/18/2011 10:29:33 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: Outlaw Woman
How about the ‘disenfranchising’ of legal voters because their vote is
being negated by other’s illegal votes?
What crap. Fraud at the polls. Fraud in the White House.
35
posted on
06/18/2011 10:39:58 AM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(VOTE out the RATS! Go Sarah!)
To: Outlaw Woman
Foregive me if I am wrong,
BUT
Isn’t Missouri one of the states that is about as dirty as Chicago when election time comes???
To: Outlaw Woman
Of course political machines have been voting dead peopleforever. I think Aaron Burr resorted to this in 1800 after he set up Tammany Hall. But the main thing is to organize down to local and get people to the polls. Next thing is to get observers into the polling places and make sure that the cheating is kept to a minimum. All this takes boots on the ground. Inevitably some precincts are as hard to police as a Taliban village.
37
posted on
06/18/2011 10:49:56 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: Joe Boucher
The fraud, as in other states is extensive in the ‘Urban’ areas. St. Louis and Kansas City are problem areas. The remainder of the state, is less likely to experience the level of fraud that is present in those areas. You know...Holder’s peeps live in those areas.
38
posted on
06/18/2011 11:05:57 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: RobbyS
Inevitably some precincts are as hard to police as a Taliban village.Terrific analogy and so true.
39
posted on
06/18/2011 11:08:13 AM PDT
by
Outlaw Woman
(Banned from the Rush Limbaugh Facebook page on 06/17/2011.)
To: itsahoot
I think the Republican "leadershipo" are just scared to death by the Democrats theats of race riots and the threat to call Republicans mean-spirited and other bad names.
Boehner and many others act like neutered servants of the empire instead of stand-up men fulfilling their Constitutional oaths.
40
posted on
06/18/2011 11:22:27 AM PDT
by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson