Posted on 06/28/2011 9:03:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
Are you supposed to have sex at work? I guess it depends on your profession, but for most of us the answer is “no.” Why then is corporate America obsessed with training about sex?
As described in several recent columns by Mike Adams, I was fired as a vendor by Cisco for my conservative beliefs about sex and marriage even though my beliefs were never expressed on the job. When a homosexual manager found out on the Internet that I had authored a book giving evidence that maintaining our current marriage laws would be best for society, he couldn’t tolerate me and requested I be fired. An HR executive canned me within hours without ever speaking to me. This happened despite the fact that the leadership and teambuilding programs I led always received high marks (even from the homosexual manager!).
How could an experienced HR professional commit such a blatant act of discrimination unless the Cisco culture was decidedly tilted left? Why didn’t Cisco’s relentless emphasis and training on “inclusion and diversity” serve to prevent this? Maybe it’s because “inclusion and diversity” means something different to corporate elites than to normal Americans. That’s why their training didn’t prevent the problem but actually created an environment of intolerance that led to the problem.
Cisco’s chief “Inclusion and Diversity” officer, Ms. Marilyn Nagel, had trouble on the phone defining what “inclusion and diversity” actually means at Cisco, so she sent me several links from the Cisco website. As in our conversation, I found no specific definition on the website but plenty of platitudes, such as Cisco is committed to “valuing and encouraging different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas.”
If that’s the case, then why not value my “perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas?”
Because only certain perspectives, styles, thoughts and ideas are approved, you see. “Inclusion and diversity” to corporate elites actually means exclusion for those that don’t agree with the approved views. Whoops, there goes “diversity.”
Shouldn’t the real intent of Cisco’s value of “inclusion and diversity” be to ensure that people in that diverse workforce work together cordially and professionally even when they inevitably disagree on certain political, moral or religious questions? It would seem so. In a large multicultural workforce, people need to work together despite political or religious differences. That’s a noble and necessary goal. It’s totalitarian, however, to subject people to “diversity” training and corporate sponsorships that go beyond teaching respect for people to advocacy of what they do in bed.
All employees should treat one another with kindness and respect because they are fellow human beings, not because of their sexual behavior. If people are to be respected simply on the basis of their behavior, then none of us qualify for respect because we have all behaved badly on occasion.
So instead of trying to force all employees to accept any sexual behavior—especially something as controversial as homosexuality—the inclusion and diversity police should be urging us to treat all people with respect simply because we are human beings. That’s all you need to be productive at work anyway.
But as soon as you start telling people from different religious and cultural backgrounds what they must think about homosexuality, you will offend and create conflict andr resentment. As a Christian, I am commanded to respect all people. That’s what I was doing at Cisco. But don’t tell me that I have to respect and celebrate what people do in bed. Don’t tell me that I must violate my conscience or my God in order to make widgets. That’s not only immoral and un-American; it’s manipulative and stupid. How does accepting homosexual behavior have anything to do with job productivity? Are we supposed to have sex at work?
There simply is no business reason to judge my beliefs about sexual behavior or anyone else’s. And even if some corporate nanny could dream up a reason, it would not justify the assault on an employee’s conscience or religion.
Notice that Cisco did not have a problem with my behavior. My job performance was deemed excellent, and I was “inclusive and diverse” by working in a respectful manner with people of all moral, religious and political views.
Cisco had a problem with my thoughts. Although I certainly accepted homosexuals, I committed the thought crime of disagreeing with homosexual behavior and homosexual political goals. So despite all their talk about “inclusion and diversity,” Cisco deemed my thoughts about something irrelevant to the workplace as grounds for immediate exclusion. Do you think they would have excluded me if I had pro-same-sex marriage thoughts? Of course not—that’s an approved view that Cisco actually sponsors (even though they deny it).
But people who don’t accept homosexual behavior don’t have to work at Cisco then!
True, they don’t. But if Cisco or any other company wants to make it a requirement that every employee and vendor personally accept the behavior of homosexuality or homosexual political goals such as same-sex marriage, then tell us directly. Broadcast it to the world. Cisco can’t and won’t because such a requirement would be a clear violation of the religious protections codified in the Civil Rights Act, and it would result in a mass exodus of employees and customers.
Instead, they create an oppressive culture of political correctness under the false banner of “inclusion and diversity” to achieve the same ends. They tell the world that they value and encourage “different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas” while they punish or intimidate into silence people who have “different perspectives, styles, thoughts, and ideas.” While Cisco executives would never admit this, their actions reveal this twisted truth: Cisco values homosexual behavior more than honesty, freedom of religion and freedom of conscience.
Is it the same at your workplace? Are you tired of having to hide your conservative or religious beliefs as if you live in a totalitarian state rather than America? If you continue to cower in silence before an intolerant militant minority, it will only get worse. To paraphrase Edmund Burke, “All that is necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing.” It’s time to do something—speak up.
It's like Orwell's 1984 doublespeak. "Inclusion and diversity" really means exclusion and censorship. The author is guilty of independent thoughts and communications. These activities present a real threat to their LGBT indoctrination agenda. So they had to fire him.
All the time but I’m single and I work at home.
I don't know if I would welcome it, due to the hardship that it will initially bring to many good and decent people, but I am looking forward to seeing the system reset. I just want to see justice done for once.
LOL...I can only imagine the humor that would come from being an employee of a company with a name like that...
At a large corporate employer of mine, every month except July was wholly or partly some hypenated American (if that) celebration. We used to call July the only American month left.
Cashmere?
It's getting that way in the U. S. military too. I almost barfed up my lunch when we had sit through the DADT repeal briefing last month.
“Why then is corporate America obsessed with training about sex?”
• The individuals populating corporate America now grew up with a pre mature attention to sex and never outgrew their adolescent fixation on sex-nothing took its place for them
• Schools in America are making sure no one gets out of there with enough intellectual prowess or emotional maturity to comprehend that sex does not belong ‘front and center’ in life.
• The MSM is making sure that these brain-dead mental dwarfs are saturated night and day with the ‘race/gender/sex’ cocktail (even in the news)
• The people you are talking about are pathologically HOOKED on trauma and sensation (addicted is a better word)
• NOTHING in the breeding or experience of these people conveys propriety or modesty
I could make the list longer, but you know what I mean.
I don’t remember anything in any of my employee handbooks about sex at work.
However they all went to great lengths to tell me that I couldn’t have a firearm, knife, or anything that could be used as a weapon.
Hrmmm yea come to think of it they must have been written by liberals.
It has aways been my experience that in any work place there will be more than one woman that thinks part of her job is to bang the boss and other employees. I had one nephew that left a good paying job because of his female boss expecting him to work on her after hours. Same thing applies to a man, always more than one that thinks it is his duty to try and play grab ass with his fellow workers. But the worst one is the on that thinks everyone wants to hear his/her nasty joke of the day.
I’m only 41 years old, and to be honest, I can’t see the ‘world’ lasting until I’m my grandparents age (80’s/90’s). There’s just no way. Jesus, I know it’s in our Father’s time, not ours, but please come sooner rather than later. The degradation, the desecration, the inhumanity is apparent to one as low as I, then it must reek in Heaven.
Come quickly, thus our days be shortened.
No, I think Kaslin should sue, too. I can see the headline now:
“New Plaintiff joins Cisco Discrimination Suit”
Yeah, but at least we’ll show them.
>>We need to totally boycott all companies, institutions and individuals, that use Cisco equipment.<<
That would be — pretty much everybody.
Look, this was wrong but Cisco is a private enterprise that can have whatever moral compass they want.
Almost all us white heterosexual Christian males have been in the cross-hairs for 20+ years. It ain’t fair and we try to strike back, but that’s life for now.
I find that a surprisingly large number of conservatives do NOT understand that there are many corporations that are as great a source of our corruption as any Marxist is. Many have long-ago crossed from "free enterprise" into "rent-seeking."
does anyone know his name?
Yeah, but we’ll have done the right thing.
LOL
What do you mean that they won't connect because they are both male? Does your HR department and the LGBT purity of political opinion subcommittee know about your attitude?
Catch them off guard by asking: “By gay do you mean the inserting of one man’s penis into another man’s anus or do you mean happy?”
I’ve found that they don’t even like the sound of it accurately described!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.