coughbullsh!tcough
Only SCOTUS is going to decide this one.
Does anyone know: is this the Michigan case?
Our founding fathers never intended for this ping-pong game in the courts. This has GOT TO STOP.
Founding fathers are constantly rolling in their graves under this bogus administration and liberal/commie courts.
Let me guess, 2 democrat nominees and one republican.
She wrote the opinion. Enough said.
Judge Boyce F. Martin, appointed by former President Jimmy Carter, wrote for the majority in the 2-1 ruling. A George W. Bush appointee concurred; a Ronald Reagan appointee who is a U.S. district judge in Columbus sitting on the panel disagreed.
Jefferson, Adams and Franklin, at least, are rolling over in their graves. What was supposed to be a judicial system that enforced and decided cases based on THE WRITTEN LAW has turned into a political activism machine, ignoring the law to suit, and interpreting it to meet political objectives.
What a sad time for our once great American republic.
This is all just a sideshow. The SCOTUS is the last word and I’m looking for a 5-4 decision that at least throws out the individual mandate.
Shows ya how far the levels of idiocy reach in the Fed Judiciary
"On the road to tyranny, we've gone so far that polite
political action is about as useless as a miniskirt in a convent."
This is so perverse. How can any judge at the Federal level, who is supposed to understand the intent of the Constitution, interpret the Commerce Clause, of all things, as a loophole that somehow allows for the unlimited expansion of Federal authority?
As the dissenting judge notes: If the exercise of power is allowed and the mandate upheld, it is difficult to see what the limits on Congresss Commerce Clause authority would be, Graham wrote. What aspect of human activity would escape federal power?
The super wealthy insiders in the corrupt insurance industry, paid off the judges and government politicians, are partying tonight!
If they don't pay, fine them, jail them or seize their assets.
Ya know where this is going.
By law, they will force you to pay or else.
No joke.
The majority are donkey headed flatulence laden pond scum snarfing pox ridden sons of whores.
I think it’s time we consider what we are going to do if the Supreme Court does uphold this. I personally think at that point, it will time for some Civil Disobediance. The idea I have is, regardless of whether you have health insurance or not, when you get to the section on the 1040 where you must provide you insurance information or calculate your fine, Take out a black magic marker and block out the entire section, like on a redacted document. Don’t write anything, just a huge black filled in box over the section and any other lines that reference penalties regarding health insurance. I guarantee, someone WILL see it because it will be kicked out of the IRS’s automated form readers (also causing them huge headaches and backlogs hand processing the returns). Of course if only a few hundred or thousand people do this, probably all you will end up with is an audit. But if even a couple million did this it would certainly send a message.
I’m not advocating violence, but if the Civil War II kicks off in my lifetime, I will make it my personal goal to bring some of these liberal judges to justice.
I’m thinking if Social Security and Medi-Care are legal to subtract from your check then so will be Health Insurance. Any other ruling would put the entire socialist machine at risk.
Slowly gnawing away the Constitution.
DICK-TATERS all.
Need legal eagle help here...what are the predictive steps from here to SCOTUS for this? I’m not legal-savvy enough to predict nor explain this...any help out there would be appreciated.