Telling the truth is now a crime.
Unbelievable. Speaking truth to the Satanic hordes is “criminal” ?!?!?
Let that sink in for a minute....
A person in Europe, simply said his honest observation and opinion. He stated what he believes to be true. AND HE IS BEING PROSECUTED.
This is our future. The socialist revolution must be stopped here and rolled back,,, hard.
I assume the Muzzies are going to arrest him being that Europe is pretty much run over by them now. All that fighting, sacrifices, death to get rid of the Nazis and the lib Euroweenies replace them with an Arab version.
.
Watch this short video wherein Col West eloquently makes the case that Muslims are the enemy of the U.S- ALL Muslims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkGQmCZjJ0k
Will the Muslim-In-Chief have HIM arrested??
.
Hope they find a prominent place for this man in the new Republican administration in 2012.
Where can I sign up to be “charged” as well?
For those who didn’t get it the first time, let me repeat that wonderful statement:
The enemy is the anti-civilization spreading from North Africa to Indonesia. Two billion people live in it and it is financed partly from oil sales and partly from drug sales.
and the Koran’s call for the killing of Christians is NOT a hate crime?
Geert Wilders and Milos Zerman get it, while the Marxist-in-Chief ain’t gotta clue.
Huge irony given the nature of this thread...or is it contradiction.
Europe is simply not free about speech unless talking about white Christians or crusades mayhem or colonization evils or of course Gnatzees and other fascists...collectivists still revered by some..go figure
We have held up good here in this area compared to them...we have the silly indulgence called hate crimes but not much else ...so far....this really sets us apart from them but with such strong minority power now in America it will be challenged...especially by Muslims and Homosexuals
The Czech Republic has forgotten what it was like to live under communism, where they had no freedom of speech.
Anyone notice that the assertion that he would face charges in the headline became ‘may face charges’ in the first sentence?
Nowhere is any agency mentioned that would press these charges nor is there anyone quoted who advocated pressing charges.
This is either rank propaganda or incompetence in journalism that would make even liberals cringe.
Which do you think?
There is NOTHING in the article to support “may face criminal charges.”
Where? On what grounds? The article doesn’t say. Worthless.
An earlier post on the same topic said that he was “being sued” for his statements, also without any further details. (I might have read about it on another forum I frequent, but the lack of facts remains.) Well, anyone can try to sue someone else for whatever. Doesn’t mean it’ll go anywhere.
Need more (well, any!) facts.
They are Borg. You will be assimilated!
Very interseting. I think some Europeans are encouraged by Geert Wilders’ courage. And now he’s been acquitted.
“Former Czech Prime Milos Zeman may face criminal charges for calling Islam an anti-civilization enemy whose type of thinking he compared with the Nazis.”
Hell, half the people I work with should get put away, if it only takes them calling me a “Nazi”.
Free speech is now a crime?
America should withdraw from, or never join, or subscribe to any organization that does not respect our most basic, Constitutionally guaranteed rights.
No to “International Criminal Court “ No to International Court of Human Rights” NO! NO WAY NO TIME NEVER!
Thanks, Nachum
POST THIS!
Mohammedanism by Winston Churchill
1899
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.
Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”
Winston Churchill
The River War, first edition, Vol. II by Winston Churchill
Publisher:London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1899