Posted on 07/24/2011 6:24:58 AM PDT by Titus-Maximus
He's a PLAGIARIST!
NO cheers, unfortunately. Pray for the families...and for Europe.
He's a PLAGIARIST!
NO cheers, unfortunately. Pray for the families...and for Europe.
And Ted Kaczynski stole it from Algore.
Do you have any idea whether he copied the Unabomber’s manifesto in its entirety, a large part of it, or just bits and pieces? IMO this is quite significant for a number of reasons.
One, the Unabomber was not exactly “right wing conservative”. Second, the “genius” ABB may not be such a genius after all. Third, I get the feeling he’s a sort of cutout, made up persona. If this last is true, who made him up?
The unabomber manifesto is about 50 pages. Breivik's is about 1,500 pages. So there's a lot more in it than just the one section that was plagarized, and what was plagiarized was only one part of Kaczynski's manifesto.
IMO this is quite significant for a number of reasons. One, the Unabomber was not exactly right wing conservative. Second, the genius ABB may not be such a genius after all.
What Breivik plagarized was Kaczynski's attack on leftism. He turned "leftism" into "multiculuralism" and "black people" into Muslims.
Breivik is no genius. He's somebody with one obsession -- a one track mind.
Third, I get the feeling hes a sort of cutout, made up persona. If this last is true, who made him up?
I don't get that feeling. When somebody is so narrowly focused on a few related issues he may look artificial if you compare him to someone who has more varied interests and activities.
Thanks for the reply and details.
Anders Behring Breivik of Norway Copied the Unabomber's Manifesto
And Ted Kaczynski stole it from Algores book, Earth in the Balance.
. . . . Article and comments.
.
No surprise here!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2752891/posts?page=150#150
Sunday, July 24, 2011 3:49:00 PM · 150 of 150
MestaMachine to little jeremiah
He did copy a couple of specific parts of it that matched up with his own ideology, but for the most part, this thing is something that is a conglomeration of how he started this, why he started this, and how he sees its conclusion. It is an amazing body of work.
Here is a couple of examples:
Q: Are you a religious man, and should science take priority over the teachings of the Bible?
A: My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion. At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterburys speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain.
I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed. We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism.
The Protestant Church had an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities.
I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe (government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.
As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedenceover biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always continue to be that way.
Q: Do I have to believe in God or Jesus in order to become a Justiciar Knight?
A: As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus. Being a Christian can mean many things;
- That you believe in and want to protect Europes Christian cultural heritage.
The European cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on Christianity -Protestantism, Catholicism, Orthodox Christianity and the legacy of the European enlightenment (reasonis the primary source and legitimacy for authority).
It is not required that you have a personal relationship with God or Jesus in order to fight for our Christian cultural heritage and the European way. In many ways, our modern societies and European secularism is a result of European Christendom and the enlightenment. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between a Christian fundamentalist theocracy (everything we do not want) and a secular European society based on our Christian cultural heritage (what we do want).
So no, you dont need to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus to fight for our Christian cultural heritage. It is enough that you are a Christian-agnostic or a Christian atheist (an atheist who wants to preserve at least the basics of the European Christian cultural legacy (Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter)).
The PCCTS, Knights Templar is therefore not a religious organisation but rather a Christian culturalist military order.
Infantacide is a deep tradition in the history of Norway, and a whole generation of sons and daughters of Norways present “Kings” have been wiped out. HORRIBLE.
But Norway has that history.It might help us to understnad the horror that Breivik wrought.
You are absolutely right. This *compendium* is a one minded, laser focussed body of work that was years in the making. He lived this, ate it, breathed it, and was willing to die for it.
It is an abolute confession, even down to how he will justify himself in an open court even though he did not expect to live through this.
What should be at the very heart of this investigation are the numbers of OTHER people who are part of this PCCT thing. It is not the traditional Knights Templar. It is a wholly separate and made up resistance movement with its own rites and rituals and rules and regulations.
It is a fully operational plan to kill hundreds of thousands of people...to *save* millions. It justifies a nuclear attack and diagrams how to attack a nuclear reactor. It calls for martyrdom.
It follows step by step how he did this, the entire timeline, and explains in technical detail how he created this bomb...and the *bonus* attack, which is obvious now was the Utoya attack. It was calculated, cold, and ingenius. It should frighten the hell out of anyone who reads it.
And much more.
What have I missed reading that I still don’t know why Breivik went to the island, and killed all of those kids, or has that one been figured out yet?
Ruh-oh.....
Leftist sociopathy alert!
You seem to have a ping list for this topic. Could you add me?
Thanks -
Well, it’s more of a all-kinds-of-political-things list, very heavy volume, with the occasional goofy fun topic just to alleviate the seriousness.
We appreciate your hard work for your ping-list.
:’) Thanks AdmSmith.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.