Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner: You bet your ** I told my caucus to get their ** in line (WATCH VIDEO)
Hotair ^ | 07/27/2011 | Ed Morrisey

Posted on 07/27/2011 10:51:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Laura Ingraham got the man of the hour on her show this morning, who confirmed that he did indeed tell the House Republican caucus to “get their asses in line” to pass his debt-ceiling proposal — once the rewrite comes in. Speaker John Boehner also explained how he and Mitch McConnell would keep the deficit-reduction commission it creates from raising taxes, especially — as Boehner reminds us — some tax hikes are already in place. Boehner explains that he wants to push the Cut, Cap, and Balance Act, but he wants to make sure that he and a Republican Senate can present it to a Republican President in 2013:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

The key in this decision by Boehner seems to be his assessment that the GOP will lose leverage the closer we get to the deadline — whenever that might be. If that’s true, then Boehner is making a smart play by consolidating what rhetorical gains the GOP has made in this debate and getting to a rapid conclusion. After watching the Gang of Six play last week in the Senate take the momentum out of the CCB Act, it’s not hard to see why Boehner came to that conclusion. Can Boehner succeed in whipping his caucus to get the needed majority to pass his plan? At the moment, that seems iffy — but Boehner has had a good track record in holding his caucus in line over the last four years.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehner; debtceiling; debtlimit; default; johnboehner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Kackikat
It is not Boehner's fault that the Senate is controlled by Democrats, and that the President is a Democrat. I'm sure he'd much rather have Republicans in those positions. Unfortunately, that's not what the electorate gave him.

The 2010 elections were a single, not a double or home run. The hard truth is that meaningful reforms will not happen as long as Democrats control the White House or Senate. That means the right approach is to do whatever we can strategically to give us that majority we need. Engaging in tactics that make us feel emotionally better but don't advance the ball in terms of legislation, and hurt our political prospects, are not smart.

61 posted on 07/27/2011 11:29:53 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

You are accusing the only people who want to reign in the government of ludicrous behavior. If you are a conservative, you should be ashamed of yourself. If you’re not, you are on the wrong forum, please leave.


62 posted on 07/27/2011 11:30:57 AM PDT by rjeffries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I vote for a “Boehner’s a Goehner in 20XX” movement, where XX stands for whatever year this RINOcrat is up again.

We simply WILL NOT TOLERATE dim-bulb-crats, or dim-bulb-crat-lite.

Boehner, hang it up...and hold your breath for -— about an hour or so.


63 posted on 07/27/2011 11:31:05 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: halo66
At what point does Boehner say “we’re done”? Or does he keep tweaking the bill to make the libs happy? Enough is enough!

At some point he'll compromise with Reid and Obama and put tax increases into the bill.

64 posted on 07/27/2011 11:31:27 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What total BS was he dishing out today? That he doesn’t want CCB to pass and land on Obama’s desk before 2013?

I’d say he’s got to be crazy, since that alone would be a huge win—the BBA on to the states and Obama dared to veto something with bipartisan senate and house support.

‘Cept he’s not crazy, he’s disingenuous—and insultingly so. Yuck!


65 posted on 07/27/2011 11:32:02 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m with you. This just demonstrates the level of mendacity coming from BOTH the democrats and the Republicans, and big media (minus Rush). Even freezing at the staggeringly bloated 2011 budget would be demagogued as a $9.5 trillion cut. That is what we are up against.


66 posted on 07/27/2011 11:32:02 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That’s wrong. If we default on our loans, it’ll cost us MORE than if paid them. Just like if you don’t pay your credit cards...that doesn’t mean you don’t still owe it, and that it won’t cost you MORE down the line. There would be late fees, they’d raise your interest rate a lot immediately, and ultimately, you’d be sued for the $$$. That’s because legally you owe it, it’s money that belongs to someone else, and they will get it back, with interest and fees, in the end.

That’s what would happen. And ALSO, we wouldn’t be able to borrow more money at reasonable interest rates. I know you say we don’t need it. But what if we did? Another BP spill? Another Katrina or Rita? A nuclear meltdown?

So it feels good up front not to pay our bills when they come due, but in the end, it ends us costing us more. We wouldn’t recover the huge expense of failing to pay our bills, for many years to come.

And of course don’t forget that some of the bills we owe are to veterans and elderly people. They live month to month on their disability or whatever. They would suffer a lot if we failed to pay them. I wouldn’t want to see that. I would hope the govt would not pay something else before it would cause suffering to our heroes, our disabled, and our elderly.


67 posted on 07/27/2011 11:32:09 AM PDT by TexasBud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: comebacknewt; rjeffries

Why fight as long and hard as they did only to surrender at the end? Baffling and infurating!

**********************

If one accepts the premises that both parties are after the same ends, and that the ‘opposition’ on both sides is purely simulated in order to placate the bases and casual observers, the past 22 years of GOP and Democrat policies make sense. The only real difference is that the Democrats are in a hurry, and the Republicans have a more subtle and incremental approach to the diminution of American sovereignty and domestic freedom, and the implementation of an expanded central government and more dependent and gullible population.

They really are on the same side. They are rivals, not enemies.

Accept those premises and there is nothing baffling at all. All is resolved and rational under that theory. Borders, globalism, divestiture of domestic industry, TARP, DHS - all of it. Every bit.


68 posted on 07/27/2011 11:32:50 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

The GOP has been losing the politics game for years playing it this way. The people are sick of it. This is a proven losing strategy.

Boehner is a disgrace.

It’s time to do the right thing, politics be damned.


69 posted on 07/27/2011 11:32:59 AM PDT by rjeffries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
I think freepers who are attacking Boehner are making a mistake. Obama is NOT going to sign this, so why not pass it and hoist Obama on his own petard, rather than let the Republicans be blamed when nothing passes?

Wasn't the same thing said about Campaign Finance Reform?

70 posted on 07/27/2011 11:33:19 AM PDT by Gritty (The depraved ruling class of America cannot self-correct, and, indeed, has no desire to-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: utahagen
Obama is NOT going to sign this.

Well, if he's not gonna sign it, then send through what we want - EVERY time.

His voters will vote for him no matter what we do, or how high we rise above the fray - they are too Stoooopid.

Tea Party voters and other conservative voters should be the ones they cater to.

71 posted on 07/27/2011 11:34:08 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Read my Lips” No new Taxes. Bush Senior Made his own bed. Don’t blame Perot.

Does that answer your post.


72 posted on 07/27/2011 11:34:21 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And my reply to that little ditty is that I emailed my Congressman last night and told him that all I wanted him to do was to vote against anything Obama wanted, to NOT raise taxes under any circumstances, and to ENSURE any cuts were real and immediate (no ten year crap). The final thing was that if he voted for Boehner for Speaker ever again I’d vote against him....if he does those things, he’s got a job no matter what really happens because I know he’s true.


73 posted on 07/27/2011 11:34:48 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Don’t focus on the danger, focus on the opportunity to bring Americans up to speed and into reality. Just because Boehner is not up to the job doesn’t mean there isn’t a republican who can.


74 posted on 07/27/2011 11:34:48 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
The Conservatives are going to lose 2012, unless they learn about UNITY, AND STICKING TOGETHER.

It is Boehner that needs to learn about unity and sticking together. So what if he "stood up to" bambi? He sure didn't stand up for long, did he? He's all show and no do.

75 posted on 07/27/2011 11:37:51 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bite it, Boehner. Get some real budget savings proposed, dipsh*t.


76 posted on 07/27/2011 11:37:52 AM PDT by ScottinVA (As a party that gives Obama what he wants, what again is the GOP`s 2012 selling point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bite it, Boehner. Get some real budget savings proposed, dipsh*t.


77 posted on 07/27/2011 11:38:56 AM PDT by ScottinVA (As a party that gives Obama what he wants, what again is the GOP`s 2012 selling point?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat; tennmountainman

Bullcrap! You must be one of devisive ones, who are destroying the Conservative movement.

***********************

YEAH! WHAT BOEHNER SAID! ALL YOU NEGROES GET YOU ASSES AND YOUR MULES BACK ON THE PLANTATION!

AND SEND US YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS!

NOW!

(ungrateful damn deeeeevisives!)


78 posted on 07/27/2011 11:40:48 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TexasBud
RE: That’s wrong. If we default on our loans, it’ll cost us MORE than if paid them. Just like if you don’t pay your credit cards...that doesn’t mean you don’t still owe it, and that it won’t cost you MORE down the line.

The folks at American Thinker did some serious math on this. Here's what they think....

By the time the debt ceiling is reached, most of Fiscal Year 2011 will be behind us. FY 2012 starts October 1. So I will use FY 2012 numbers to guide this exercise.

OMB estimates FY 2012 revenues to be $2.6 trillion. So if the debt ceiling is not raised, the federal government would have to get by on that for the year. That is more than the federal government spent in any year prior to 2006.

But OMB estimates 2012 spending to be $3.7 trillion, or $1.1 trillion more than revenues then. Somehow, spending would have to be "cut" (from the expected levels) by 29.5%.

To avoid default, interest payments would have to be made. OMB expects them to be $243 billion in 2012. That would leave $2.4 trillion for everything else.

If Social Security and Medicare are also untouched, that would leave $1.1 trillion for everything else. That is, we could avoid default and pay seniors every cent they expect from Social Security and Medicare, and still have well over one trillion dollars left for everything else.

The trouble is OMB estimates everything else to cost $2.2 trillion. So to leave SS and Medicare untouched, and also not default, the rest of the 2012 budget would have to be cut by $1.1 trillion, or about 50%.

The elephant in the room is defense spending. We certainly don't want to stop paying our military men and women who are fighting wars. OMB estimates all spending on national defense to be $738 B in 2012. But less than $160 B of that is military pay. Let's say we leave military pay untouched, but cut overall defense spending to 2005 levels. That is a 33% cut. Maybe we could find savings by removing bases and troops from Japan, Korea, Germany and elsewhere around the world, especially since ground wars in Asia, Africa and the Middle East have been ruled out.

Here is a shot at an overall spending budget, using OMB's categories, that meets the $2.6 trillion target to match revenues. (Most spending amounts in the right-hand column fall into one of three categories: untouched from OMB's 2012 estimate, zeroed out, or matching the minimum year's spending since 2005.

Spending category

FY 2005 Actual

OMB's 2012 estimate

A balanced 2012 budget

National Defense

495,308

737,537

495,308

International Affairs

34,565

63,001

8,974*

General Science, Space and Technology

23,597

32,284

23,584

Energy

429

23,411

0

Natural Resources and Environment

27,980

42,703

27,980

Agriculture

26,565

18,929

17,662

Commerce and Housing Credit

7,566

23,620

0

Transportation

67,894

104,854

67,894

Community and Regional Development

26,262

25,701

8,545**

Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services

97,555

106,172

0

Health (excluding Medicare)

250,548

373,774

250,548

Medicare

298,638

492,316

492,316

Income Security

345,847

554,332

226,554***

Social Security

523,305

767,019

767,019

Veterans Benefits and Services

70,120

124,659

69,811

Admin. of Justice

40,019

58,696

23,770****

General Government

16,997

31,149

16,997

Net Interest

183,986

241,598

241,598

Allowances

0

6,566

0

Undistributed Offsetting Receipts

-65,224

-99,635

-99,635

Total Outlays

2,471,957

3,728,686

2,638,925

*2005 level, but without foreign aid

**Disaster relief only

***Retirement, disability and unemployment only

****Retains prison spending, cuts other justice funding in half

The above budget is in rough balance. It would not increase debt, so the debt ceiling would not have to be raised or violated. It would also preserve the core functions of the federal government, and then some. Note some key features:

•Net interest is paid in full. No default.
•Social Security and Medicare are completely covered.
•Federal retirement and disability programs would also be fully funded.
•The men and women of the military would continue getting paid in full.
•Federal prisons and correctional facilities would continue to operate.
•Funds for disaster relief are preserved.
•General government would be funded enough to keep operating. That includes the courts, legislative functions, the executive branch, and foreign affairs.
•There is still funding for infrastructure, science, agriculture, etc.

Of course, deep and painful cuts would have to come from somewhere.

Education spending is eliminated in the above budget. But note that the federal government accounts for less than 10% of total public education spending. Public schools would have to survive on the 90% of planned budgets that come from state and local governments. But they also would be relieved of federal mandates and rules. Would that be so bad? The Dept. of Education did not even exist prior to 1980; it was given to us by President Jimmy Carter. We lived without it before; we can live without it now.
79 posted on 07/27/2011 11:40:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It seems to me that pushing the CCB now, is a good way to have an excellent issue to use to win the election in 2012.

Let Demint work the Senate to get those 4 votes needed without all this Kabuki Theater. Just state the facts:

The house already compromised and agreed to raise the debt ceiling in exchange for spending cuts, and a plan to balance the budget. It was bi-partisan, and reflects the desire of the majority of Americans.

The House has done it's part. The senate needs to bring it up for debate, amendment, and passage so that it can go to the conference committee if necessary.

80 posted on 07/27/2011 11:45:04 AM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson