Skip to comments.If Anders Behring Breivik were american we'd spot his progressivism. He supported Eugenics (VANITY)
Posted on 07/27/2011 6:45:47 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
Something that few journalists will honestly do is read through Breivik's manifesto. Sure, they'll talk about the unabomber, but they won't go much further. As is being catalogued in certain places, there's a reason for that. Some of the things we've learned are as follows:
Oslo Terrorist anti-Oil, pro-Environment Extremist?
Oslo Terrorist Was He a Christian Conservative?
The Manifesto supports: Environmentalism One-Child Birth policies Nationalization (State Control) of Private Companies
and the Manifesto criticizes: American Capitalism American Imperialism American Intervention Right-Wing Media Monopolies Weakness of Christianity
But there's still more in this manifesto of his.(It's massive, over 1500 pages) I happened to stumble into his support for eugenics. Yes, eugenics! On page 1200 section b:
Biological perfection - reprogenetics
The Nazis destroyed the reputation of "eugenics" by combining it to scientific racism and mass extermination. But seeking biological perfection is still a logical concept and I don't see why we should abandon it. We just have to make sure that we offer it as a voluntary option to everyone or at least start by legalising it (promotional voluntary reprogenetics or private reprogenetics). We should legalise reproductive technologies that will allow parents to create off spring with biological improvement (reprogenetics). This must be a non-coercive form of biological improvement which will be predominantly motivated by individual competitiveness and the desire to create the best opportunities for children.
But apparently some academics changed the name. Modern eugenics is no longer called eugenics. Now it's called reprogenetics. Now doesn't that sound a whole lot nicer? *rolls eyes*
We all know that the facts aren't going to stop the media from beating us all over the head with it.
But eugenics? The most progressive of all progressive ideas. Anders Behring Breivik supported it, under it's new moniker, reprogenetics.
When he wrote “Christian” he meant culturally, he should have used the term “Western Culture”.
6 Myths about Norway Killer
Well then he’s a good guy.... /S
Vendomes version of a just and proper punishment:
I would have chained his hands and legs, then pulled him up four flights of metal fire escape stairs, feet first.
Then I would have kicked him in the family jewels just enough to cause a stomach ache every 15 minutes for 8 hours.
After that I would push him out a window letting him fall four stories into a pile of razor wire 5 rolls high and 5 rolls wide.
He could lay in the pile of razor wire for two days in the desert sun and then I would release a flock of crows and 1 gallon of scarabs right next to him.
But thats just me.
He may not have been that sane. The link you show suggests that he is not.
Incidentally, not only does Michael Savage play up the Christian angle (unlike the more religious Dan Greenfield), but Savage also played this Norwegian troll song because of the massacre.
Savage is a plant to make conservatives look bad, I am pretty convinced
He doesn't strike me as a plant. He does strike me as someone who is jealous of Rush Limbaugh because Rush does not have the formal education that Dr. Savage has, but Rush is just as or more articulate than Dr. Savage.
And Rush's ratings are higher than Michael Savage's.
Oh, it’s what they do. What was it a year ago that an envirowacko shot up the headquarters of the Discovery Channel and the press theorized that perhaps he was motivated by “anti-immigrant” sentiments.
“Savage is a plant to make conservatives look bad, I am pretty convinced”
I thought I was alone in thinking that. So there are at least two of us.
Oh, for fugs sake, everybody’s saying he’s not one of ours, when the man is one of us all!
I think there are a few other freepers, I saw a discussion the other day.
Three of us. He sounds as fake as a seminar caller.