Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I saw an article browsing the Wall Street Journal on this Naomi Wolf piece, thought I'd post a link to the original.
1 posted on 07/30/2011 7:13:58 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Recovering_Democrat
Interesting quote:

This dopamine effect explains why pornography tends to become more and more extreme over time: ordinary sexual images eventually lose their power, leading consumers to need images that break other taboos in other kinds of ways, in order to feel as good. Moreover, some men (and women) have a “dopamine hole” – their brains’ reward systems are less efficient – making them more likely to become addicted to more extreme porn more easily.

Sounds like what Christian anti-porn crusaders have been saying for years.

2 posted on 07/30/2011 7:15:23 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
I'm reminded of this:

Lust is Lurking

(by Chuck Swindoll)

I think of the gentleman I met several years ago-a fine itinerant Bible teacher. He said he had been keeping a confidential list of men who were once outstanding expositors of the Scripture, capable and respected men of God... who have shipwrecked their faith on the shoals of moral defilement. During the previous week, he said, he had entered the name of forty-two in his book. This sad, sordid statistic, he claims, caused him to be extra cautious and discreet in his own life. Perhaps, by now, he has added a couple dozen more.

A chill ran down my spine when he told that story. No one is immune. You're not. I'm not. Lust is no respecter of persons...lts alluring voice can infiltrate the most intelligent mind and cause its victim to believe its lies and respond to its appeal. And beware-it never gives up...it never runs out of ideas. Bolt your front door and it'll rattle at the bedroom window, crawl into the living room through the TV screen, or wink at you out of a magazine in the den...

Lust is persistent. If it's knocked on your door once, it'll knock again. And again. You are safe just so long as you draw upon your Savior's strength. Try to handle it yourself and you'll lose-every time. This is why we are warned again and again in the New Testament to flee sexual temptations. Remember, lust is committed to wage war against your soul-in a life-and-death struggle-in hand- to-hand combat. Don't stand before this mortal enemy and argue or fight in your own strength-run for cover...lf you get yourself into a situation that leaves you defenseless and weak, if your door is left even slightly ajar, you may be sure that this ancient enemy will kick it open with six-guns blazing. So don't leave it open. Don't give lust a foothold-or even a toehold.

Col. 3:5 Put to death, therefore, whatever belongs to your earthly nature; sexual immorality, impurity, lust, evil desires and greed, which is idolatry.

3 posted on 07/30/2011 7:16:20 PM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

When I was 17 we had a country neighbor who was 16. Now she nearly drove me crazy. She would lead me to water but she would not let me drink.

She later won the local county beauty contest. She deserved it too.


4 posted on 07/30/2011 7:18:05 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

“unlike today, though, they were far more discreet and generally used much better judgment in order to cover their tracks”

then how do you know they existed?


5 posted on 07/30/2011 7:19:14 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Doubt it, does anyone know how to keep squirrels off your desk,????


6 posted on 07/30/2011 7:19:26 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

If God says it’s not good for us, it’s not.


9 posted on 07/30/2011 7:21:01 PM PDT by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

No, it’s making them go blind!


10 posted on 07/30/2011 7:21:19 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
” Some powerful men have long been sexually voracious..”

This statement really irritates me. It's the same logic used by Eleanor Clift to excuse Clinton for his escapades. Are we supposed to think that Anthony Weiner did his texting etc. because he was a powerful and thus sexually aggressive man? That's pathetic. What is a ‘powerful’ man? Someone who doesn't have the power to control their own appetites? Someone who is too narcissistic to look beyond themselves? If you can't control yourself you're not that ‘powerful’.

14 posted on 07/30/2011 7:30:51 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

15 posted on 07/30/2011 7:33:26 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

The Marquis de Sade wrote all his stuff before the advent of internets porn. Nabokov, too. Lady Chatterly’s Lover.

Seems that there have been a number of high-profile sex scandals before Algor invented cheap free gigabytes of pr0n.


16 posted on 07/30/2011 7:33:53 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

The idea that a woman has complete domain over her own body —isn’t that an idea central to feminism..?

Sounds like intolerance to me....


20 posted on 07/30/2011 7:37:48 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

What about the paradigm shift over the last decade: Now, when you hear about a teacher having sex with students it is ALWAYS a female teacher.

Yes, I said always.


21 posted on 07/30/2011 7:39:02 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

wh-wh-a-wha-what?


22 posted on 07/30/2011 7:42:19 PM PDT by Drango (NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

There’s a story of an old native American talking to his grandson. He says “in me there are two wolves locked in battle. One is good, kind, and virtuous. The other is cruel, selfish, and wicked.”

“Which one will win Grandfather?” the boy asks.

“Wichever I feed more.” he replies


24 posted on 07/30/2011 7:46:20 PM PDT by MNDude (so that's what they meant by Carter's second term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Is FR turning into DU? all this week Freepers have been posting articles from Politico, Rolling Stone, The Atlantic, The Nation, and quoting Dana Millbank to trash Boehner, now Naomi Wolf is an authority?

Good lord am I in a parallel universe?


26 posted on 07/30/2011 7:48:35 PM PDT by Perdogg (0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

27 posted on 07/30/2011 7:49:37 PM PDT by CtBigPat (Free Republic - The grown-ups table of the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Wolf is a died in the wool feminist.

A friend of a friend told me of a couple who´ve had a great monogamous marriage through porn goin’ on near 40 years.

¨Yes. Well, I guess people do those things.¨


28 posted on 07/30/2011 7:51:28 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I think someone posted this a few weeks ago.


29 posted on 07/30/2011 7:52:37 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat
It is hard to ignore how many highly visible men in recent years (indeed, months) have behaved in sexually self-destructive ways.

Like that never has happened before in history.

Here's an idea: why not elect people we can actually respect and even look up to instead of sleaze bags whose morals and habits make them utterly temptable and totally vulnerable to blackmail and worthy of nothing more than our disgust?

Might as well start now.

32 posted on 07/30/2011 7:54:41 PM PDT by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Recovering_Democrat

This thread is no good without pictures.


37 posted on 07/30/2011 7:57:40 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson