Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX NEWS: Tax Hikes 'Impossible' Under Debt Deal? Think Again ( Debt deal is indeed a BIG TAX HIKE!)
FoxNews ^ | August 01, 2011 3:20PM Eastern | Staff

Posted on 08/01/2011 11:06:13 AM PDT by Kevin in California

Edited on 08/01/2011 12:52:01 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Just reported that in this debt deal is indeed a BIG TAX HIKE!

This is breaking....:

Tax Hikes 'Impossible' Under Debt Deal? Think Again ...

Published August 01, 2011

| FoxNews.com

The debt-ceiling deal moving toward a vote in Congress could easily pave the way for tax increases despite Republican claims that tax hikes are "impossible" under a deal struck with the White House to reduce spending in exchange for a debt-limit increase. 

But as everyone knows, "impossible" isn't really in Washington's vocabulary.

Here's how it could happen:

After Congress enacts more than $900 billion in spending cuts to give President Obama a $900 billion lift in the nation's $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, a bipartisan committee will be formed to find roughly $1.5 trillion in additional deficit savings over the next decade. 

To get there, the committee is free to look at virtually anything -- including "revenue" -- even though House Speaker John Boehner said Sunday night that current budgeting guidelines make it "impossible" for the 12-member group to approve tax hikes. 

Other officials and analysts beg to differ. 

"The suggestion that it is impossible for the joint committee to raise tax revenue simply is not accurate, it's false," White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Monday. 

Tea Party-aligned Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, said that's one of the concerns stopping him from supporting the deal. 

"Certainly, tax increases could be something that we could face," Lee told Fox News. 

Boehner is able to claim no tax hikes are possible because the committee would work off the assumption that the Bush tax cuts -- all of them -- will expire in 2013. Combined with other expiring provisions, that adds up to $3.5 trillion in tax hikes over the next decade, without the committee taking any action

Excerpt, read more: here



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: deception; democrats; liberalfascism; lies; morevanities; notaxes; notbreaking; notbreakingnews; notsourced; ohthehugevanity; taxcheatparty; taxes; troll; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last
To: All; Kevin in California
Boehner's office has released an outline addressing many issues:

http://www.speaker.gov/UploadedFiles/3-7-31-11-Debt-Framework-Boehner.pdf

On taxes and the committee, it says this:

Under the framework, the Joint Committee of Congress will work off a current-law baseline, as required by the 1974 Budget Act, effectively making it impossible for Joint Committee to increase taxes.

41 posted on 08/01/2011 11:21:07 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Next: coalescing behind ONE "Balanced Budget Amendment" (BBA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Does the deal raise taxes or not?

And if ya hafta ask...

42 posted on 08/01/2011 11:21:07 AM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They are better off just passing a debt hike with the first round of cuts, and calling it a day. On to 2012 without creating this monstrosity of a super committee with all the fallback provisions. This is looking to be the turkey we all feared it would be.


43 posted on 08/01/2011 11:21:19 AM PDT by ilgipper (political rhetoric is no substitute for competence (Thomas Sowell))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
How about a crumb of a detail. What tax? When? By how much?

Details do not matter. Any sucking of money for any sector, rich or otherwise, results in you paying more in taxes. Is that hard to understand since it has been explained time and time again.

Here is one: If you raise taxes on the super rich, you will have that tax passed along in higher service cost or products that this rich person provides. Therefore you are paying the tax. Get it.

Many more examples but just to lengthy to explain such as health care. Pure forced tax. And if you think your employer pays them for you, watch your pay check grow. Crickets!!!!!!

44 posted on 08/01/2011 11:21:42 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

Tell Me Lies, tell me sweet little lies
~Tell Me Lies, Tell me tell me lies~
Oh no no, you can’t disguise
~You can’t disguise, no you can’t disguise~
Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies


45 posted on 08/01/2011 11:21:47 AM PDT by tumblindice (No one's life, liberty or property is safe while Congress is in session. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

there is no time to read it. We are in a crisis!!!


46 posted on 08/01/2011 11:22:07 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California; 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ...

If this passes, we are apparently screwed.

PING!


47 posted on 08/01/2011 11:22:07 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (It's the Tea Party's fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigred44

Add in the AMT Fix to The Bush Tax Cuts expiring!


48 posted on 08/01/2011 11:22:35 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Yeah sure.....and how many times have you heard one thing..and something else happens.

They are monkeying around with the Baseline to make their claims.


49 posted on 08/01/2011 11:22:53 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
That is such a crock.

Baseline Budgeting Makes Real Cuts Impossible in Washington

Speaker Boehner, you are a poltroon.

50 posted on 08/01/2011 11:23:09 AM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

will the free press rescue us after all?

has CNN or MSNBC reacted?

This must be why the market tanked this morning. The pencil pushers had figured it out.


51 posted on 08/01/2011 11:23:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Seems that the FICA relief for this year will expire, which is tantamount to a tax increase. Also, there is the “mess” of the Super Congress (Constitutional?)being in a position to call for tax increases as a result of shortfalls in “revenue.”

It seems to be written as a trap.


52 posted on 08/01/2011 11:23:36 AM PDT by jennings2004 (Sarah Palin: "The bright light at the end of a very dark tunnel!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Where is the source? There is nothing on the Fox news page.


53 posted on 08/01/2011 11:23:57 AM PDT by Perdogg (0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Peter from Rutland

I wonder if they are talking about the fact that this deal guarantees the Bush tax cuts won’t be extended in 2013. That is a huge tax increase.


54 posted on 08/01/2011 11:24:13 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
I predicted yesterday West would vote for it.

I won't hold it against him.

55 posted on 08/01/2011 11:24:35 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Next: coalescing behind ONE "Balanced Budget Amendment" (BBA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: paul51

They don’t read the bills when there isnt a crisis.


56 posted on 08/01/2011 11:25:01 AM PDT by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DManA

That’s about the only thing I can think of at this point.


57 posted on 08/01/2011 11:25:15 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Here’s a question I have from the discussions today. Does this supercommittee meet though this November and make their recommendations, and then go away, or is it some sort of permanent structure heading into 2012 and beyond? If it is the later, screw that.


58 posted on 08/01/2011 11:25:21 AM PDT by ilgipper (political rhetoric is no substitute for competence (Thomas Sowell))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jennings2004
Any taxes recommended by the super commission must be voted on by the Congress.
59 posted on 08/01/2011 11:26:27 AM PDT by Perdogg (0bama got 0sama?? Really, was 0sama on the golf course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kevin in California

This is why we can’t have nice things! This is why we can’t have a puppy!


60 posted on 08/01/2011 11:26:28 AM PDT by Crawdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson