Yes, the eevil rich don't pay "their fair share."
>>>>We would also like to know why the president gets to define “fair” for the purposes of tax collecting. Why does his definition and that of his party outweigh any other definitions of what is fair? That seems like the job of an emperor, not an elected president who swore that he would uphold the Constitution and its 14th Amendment requirement that everyone receive equal treatment under the law.
Yes, the eevil rich don't pay "their fair share."
They get the Peanuts and we get the shells
“You know the thing about chaos... ITS FAIR”
Joker
Gettin old DEMs. Besides, not many rich left.
Its really quite simple. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need with Obama being the arbiter of both sides.
Its really quite simple. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need with Obama being the arbiter of both sides.
Its really quite simple. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need with Obama being the arbiter of both sides.
Its really quite simple. From each according to his ability, to each according to his need with Obama being the arbiter of both sides.
47% pay nothing. A fair share is zero? How is that fair? Shouldn’t they at least pay a token $1.00? Wouldn’t it really be fair if everyone paid SOMETHING?
Democrat socialists. 47% pay nothing == their ‘fair share’.
That means they believe 47% of Americans DESERVE TO PAY NOTHING. It’s up to OTHER PEOPLE to take care of them. With Obama taking credit for it. Those 47% actually get money back. It is just sickening. Sickening we have so many Americans that believe they deserve to be taken care of by fellow Americans’ tax money ‘redistributed’ to them. Sickening so many politicians use citizens against each other.