Skip to comments.Obama Sets Up America for Helter Skelter 2012 Summer
Posted on 08/17/2011 6:53:07 AM PDT by OneVike
When Obama won the election against John McCain in 2008; he did so with a majority of the white vote. That's saying a lot considering the United States is the only nation on the planet whose citizens willingly elected, as their leader, a man who hails from the very class of people that was once considered only 3/4 human.
So if we Americans have grown beyond our racist past, then why is the first black president going after communities across America because he believes they are racist for not having enough blacks and Hispanics living there? Why did Obama instruct his DOJ to stop pursuing civil rights violations committed by nonwhite Americans? Not my accusation, but that of a former leading prosecutor of the DOJ, J. Christian Adams, who resigned over the administration's refusal to prosecute black violators. Adams wrote in a commentary for the New York Times;
"Citizens would be shocked to learn about the open and pervasive hostility within the Justice department to bringing civil rights cases against nonwhite defendants on behalf of white victims. Equal enforcement of justice is not a priority of this administration. Open contempt is voiced for these types of cases.
If Obama really wants to be, as he said, the president of all Americans, then why has he not asked the DOJ to investigate the escalating black on white violence across America? After all, Obama claimed that hate crimes would not be tolerated by his administration when he signed the new hate crime legislation in October of 2009. I guess he only meant hate crimes against blacks, Hispanics, and gay people, because what is happening across America today is unconscionable.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsblaze.com ...
This is the first column I have written since NEWS BLAZE hired me on as a writer. Unlike my blog at GATE, I can only post an excerpt. However, when i do post articles from my blog, I will still post them in full. This column is my take on what America is being set up for by the Obama administration not intervening in all the black on white mob violence going on around the country. It's Titled, "Obama Sets Up America for Helter Skelter 2012 Summer". because I truly believe Obama wants all hell to break lose next year during the primary election season. ----------------------
It was 3/5 of a count for census purposes. It was not a human identifier, it was done to stave off a politcal move to control power.
I checked and the “3/4” is in the original article. Should have been “3/5”. This guy is on the way towards being a real journalist! ;-)
Lock and load...its gonna be a nasty election season...watch out for Flash Mobs and stay armed...it’s only common sense.
Interesting take. I’m all for “black nationalism” in africa. I will gladly pay for one way plane tickets for ten africans to leave this country and return to africa.
Yes I hate this calumny ("only worth 3/5 of a human") being repeated.
Really was 3/5?
Interesting, because most people think it 3/4, but does it matter, it was still less then one white person.
So the point is still made.
The one thing Obama is good at is keeping people stirred up and on edge. One of these days soon, it’s going to blow up in his face.
Republicans need to start calling out Barack and his leftist minions on their race baiting and race polarization and their violent union activities. The left takes their class warfare into race warfare for power to the point of murder throughout history. Promoting race jealously, hatred and fear for power is responsible for inspiring Black racist mobs to attack whites in the cities. Unions are murdering and threatening people now.
If we fail to bring this up on a high level at the GOP, we will be blamed when Barack and his minions pull the race riot trigger in the name of “Tea Party” austerity. We should put that ball in the Left’s court NOW - before set off their race riots so we can tell them “we told you so!”
Republicans are going to be called racist regardless of what they say or do during the election, so we need to take them to the mat on this and the House needs to take Holder to task for not doing his job.
This could be absolutely true because if all hell does break loose, couldn’t he declare martial law? Thereby putting off the elections? I wouldn’t put it past him to try.
Certain people are going ape shit.
Never let a good crisis go to waste, espially one that you contrived.
He may be a deluded old looney tune suffering from the early stages of dementia, but in his latest book Ralph Nader touted the political utility of “flash mob” violence.
And if Ralph is writing about it, you know the Left has got to be thinking about it.
Sure could, and if white teens start roaming the streets to attack blacks, then you know that the Republican party will not dare stop him form declaring marshal law.
Parents, teach your teenage boys restraint. We need to get him out of office, but the ones who would attack blacks would be the teenagers of leftist liberals who are all on the dole.
If I recall correctly, sending emancipated Blacks back to Africa was Lincoln’s original preference.
There’s a monument to the man in the Federal capital.
Slaves, not all blacks, were counted as three-fifths of a citizen, not human being. Notice the word COUNTED. it was for determining representation in the U. S. House of Representatives. The southern states wanted slaves counted as full persons in order to boost the number of representatives from the south and thereby have more votes to fight attempts to end slavery. The compromise was 3/5. Free blacks were counted the same as whites.
Liberia was created for that purpose.
I've been saying this very thing for the last 3 years. Barack Hussein Obama may not be re-elected next November, but he's not leaving the WH either.
All I've gotta say is he better not fsck up my wedding next November, or I'll be pissed!
I intend on telling anyone who throws the race card out how it is.
“Your race card is broken”
“Baiting with your racist comments might work with the fish but not me”
These are the nice comments. I have others, but I don’t want to be banned.
Folks best be prepared to stay away from major metropolitan and high density population areas, the night of and the day following the Presidential election in November 2012. Whether the false obamassiah loses the election in a close count or in a blowout, accusations will fly that racists have stolen the election. I fully expect the following violence, looting and destruction to be of such magnitude as to make the recent Great Britain riots look like a bingo game in a nursing home.
“most people think it 3/4”
When I learned the history of the Constitution it was referred to as the “Three Fifths Compromise”.
It is written right in the Constitution at Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3.
It’s a side issue to your main argument but you’re not correct. The fraction was a compromise during the Constitutional Convention over the counting of slaves as part of the population for congressional representation. The South wanted slaves to count as inhabitants—a full human beings—so you are just wrong. The anti-slavery delegates weren’t saying that blacks were only 3/5s human.
Your still getting it wrong.
Slaves counting 3/5’s for purposes of representation was a way of restraining the slave states by reducing their representation in Congress. It wasn’t about black’s status as human beings.
I think you are probably correct that, due to the woeful state of public education, people who even know about the three fifths compromise think it was intended to denigrate black people in racist America. In reality, its purpose was to reduce the power of the slave states and it was backed by the abolitionists.
Ask any black, and they will repeat the lies they have been taught. I was wrong on the percentage, but I sis not want to get into explaining the reason for the use of it.
If I tried to educate people on every point made in a column, then it would be 10 pages long.
That being said, I admit I was wrong on the percentage, It was 3/5 as you state.
We said that last time and it didn’t happen.
Still, I don’t live in an urban area, and I’m not planning to visit one, esp. during or after the election.
thank you, my point exactly.
Does your wedding registry include lots of arms and ammunition, maybe a few special order items like area denial weapons?
Hey, shouldn’t an editor have caught the 3/4 as apposed to 3/5 mistake I made before they published it?
I ask, because it seems like they pretty much published my column as it was when I submitted it.
CONGRATULATION on your upcoming nuptials!!
This is all part of Soros/obama/holder plan.
Right. This notion that blacks were considered only 3/5's of a person because the founding fathers were racists needs to be confronted whenever it surfaces. The fractional representation was put in the constitution to limit the political power of the southern states. The south wanted slaves counted as a whole persons, not fractional, so that they would have more political representation.
I agree, and America better wake up before they find themselves with a Castro/Chavez type dictator that destroy any vestiges of freedom we have left.
Good grief, you still don’t get why folks are correcting you. It’s NOT the number you stated, it’s because you perpetuate the myth that it was because the founders thought blacks were less than human.
My favorite, hands down is, "I don't like his white half, either."
My favorite, hands down is, "I don't like his white half, either."
If your point was to expose the poor education system. Why didn't you state that. From all of the posters who are exposing your misstatement of the 3/5, I think you did a poor job of stating your point.
...and if we have something like Britain
(the “Day of Rage” next month might be a warmup),
and people defend themselves with guns,
i think Obama would jump at the chance to declare Martial Law. “just until it settles down”.
after the past 3 years, i don’t underestimate progressives.
Congratulations - and good job!
They wanted the voting weight of the population to work on their behalf with legislating, but they didn't want to allow the blacks to vote.
Good grief, you still dont get why folks are correcting you. Its NOT the number you stated, its because you perpetuate the myth that it was because the founders thought blacks were less than human.No, the part of your comment I agreed with was the following part;
people who even know about the three fifths compromise think it was intended to denigrate black people in racist AmericaI wrote it in the way I did because that is what the blacks and liberals perceive as the facts. It is but a small portion of the point, and a side one at that.
Thanks momma! That means a lot coming from you since we’ve talked extensively in the past. FRegards to you and your brood!
Yes, Obama has communist friends all tied into the leftists Un ions and Hollywood that will pull out all the stops to keep his ass on “Canadian Greyhound One”.
Thanks, it’s good to know that not everyone was sidetracked by the 3/4 vs the 3/5 problem.
A writer’s only asset is his credibility. The inability to get a basic fact correct undermines that lone asset. The attempt to minimize the error is perhaps even more revealing. At least you didn’t blame the tsunami or the Arab Spring. Editing today has been replace by Spell Check.
How can one seek to inform others when they themselves are uninformed?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.