Posted on 08/23/2011 6:40:06 AM PDT by C210N
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 19% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-four percent (45%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -26
Wait... I thought Rasmussen was “RINO GARBAGE!!! (TM)” and “ESTABLISHMENT HACK!” and his polls “WORTHLESS LIES” all because he had a poll that showed Obama way ahead of Palin. So suddenly, his polls are golden again?
Explain this for me.
We seem to have a troll here, not just in the keywords. I’ve gotten freepmail from him too.
Yep, “Mark K Smith” has freepmailed me with
“f* you a*hole” (totally spelled out of course)
I guess that is the extent of the left’s ability to defend 0bama...
How can we understand the mindset of the person who wrote that sign...why would anyone not want to be free? Interesting that he doesn’t even have the guts to show his face.
I got a freepmail from him too.
If you put stock in ANY poll this early in the game for elections you’re going to be sorely disapointed with the final results. Remember around this time a couple of years ago it was supposed to be a Clinton vs. Giluani race. How’d that prediction turn out? You PDSers(TM) point to a poll early in the game and tell us she can’t win, when the premise is utter bs. The campaign hasn’t even heated up yet and she’s an undeclared candidate. Polls are only a baromter of where a candiate is at, and it can change in an instant. I’ll push the panic button when Palin is down by 30 points with two months to go in the election, until that happens I’ll take polls saying she can’t win with a grain of salt.
I got similar from him, but it looks like he’s already been zotted.
He probably understands, and hates the idea, that “freedom” means that people will do things you don’t approve of.
You see the same mentality on the left. They define “freedom” as “freedom from responsibility” and “freedom to do anything we approve of”.
I want to kill Mark K Smith. Seriously. If JimRob will kindly send me the IP traffic, I can track this guy down. I want to feast on his corpse.
Me, too. I thought it was an Auburn-Bama thing and he is really Harvey Updyke.
I’ll hit an abuse button somewhere.
Nice - but let’s hope that Barky is not valleying too soon.
This PDS nonsense is just that. Nonsense. Just because other Conservatives prefer another Conservative candidate (NOT ROMNEY) doesn’t make them anti-Palin. Many just think other Conservatives in the race have a better chance, or find themselves more in agreement with some of the positions of the other Conservatives in the race.
A LOT of people have problems with Palin endorsing liberal women over the more Conservative males in the Republican primaries. IE: Karen Handel over Nathan Deal in Georgia.
His IP has been traced to the White House. Go Laz!!!
On second thought maybe better stick to make love, not war. The grappling hooks are much lighter.
Yep. But those for whom Obama has been too moderate are still sure to vote for him in 2012.
“All these people who don’t approve of Obama, but will vote for him anyway?”
Do not EVER underestimate the power of Media Propaganda. That’s how this guy got elected in the first place.
History is full of examples of people voting against their own survival due to propaganda. Do not think it can’t happen again, and get complacent.
Nope...that’s Maxine in her own drag.
A lot of people noted that Palin was totally absent in the Reid-Angle race as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.