Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clock ticking on Sarah Palin entry into 2012 presidential race
Politico ^ | 08/25/2011 | Molly Ball

Posted on 08/25/2011 2:35:30 PM PDT by Hawk720

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last
To: normy

I JUMPED NOTHING! I never said I don’t go on a Perry thread. You, however, said you don’t go on Sarah threads. Keep it honest!! Why do you need the constant reminder??


61 posted on 08/25/2011 3:43:00 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Andy from Chapel Hill

Reasonable analysis.


62 posted on 08/25/2011 3:44:57 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

>>We can raise that much for her right here!<<

You can COUNT on that!


63 posted on 08/25/2011 3:46:43 PM PDT by TrumpisRight (President Palin sounds so good....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720
RINOs and libs are saying she is going to announce Set 3rd—trying to set up her supporters for a letdown if she doesn't.

If I were her,I would avoid announcing any day even close to the big socialist holiday aka Labor Day.
Now Sept 16,”Constitution Day” and Sarah is all about the constitution—especially the 10th Amendment (though she wouldn't be so stupid as to say she was just FINE about a state passing a homosexual marriage law).
Launch on Constitution Day would be my advice—of course if she does she has already thought of it so my advice is moot.
Sarah's “It's The Constitution Mr Obama!” campaign starting on Monday the 16th and swamping the media thru constitution week will have all the others biting at her ankles and using Lib lies (like some are doing here now)to slow her.

64 posted on 08/25/2011 3:49:25 PM PDT by Happy Rain ("11/4/2008: The day America elected a pyromaniac in the middle of a fire storm.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
I honestly think she's weighing her options, still. Why should she be guided by the media punks' idea of a timetable? There are timetables built into the system.

I also think she's letting the screamers, howlers and assorted crazies at MSNBC and Media Matters exhaust themselves snarling and seizing up in fits over the various repubs. Why not let them use up a lot of resources going after Bachman, Perry, etc?

Seriously, look how they wear themselves out! Michelle made a few minor gaffes and they tried to take her down with them.

Now they're dashing themselves against the rocks over Perry.

By the time she does get in, if she does, her primary opponents will be tired, and the LSM will be ragged.

And the public will start to tune the LSM out. They've heard it too many times.

She also keeps Perry "honest"--he has no temptation to move left.

65 posted on 08/25/2011 3:49:37 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

No one but Sarah and her team know for sure. But oh how I would love to see a Palin/Bachman ticket. We’d be picking up pieces of exploded Dem heads everywhere. Well some people would be picking them up I’d just kick them out of the way all the while smiling.


66 posted on 08/25/2011 3:49:50 PM PDT by Graneros ("It is no exaggeration to say that the undecided could go one way or another.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

The very idea is repugnant and any candidate who would do this cares far more about their ego than their country.


67 posted on 08/25/2011 3:50:59 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: normy

I can’t speak for JR or really anybody but myself, but there be trolls among us who do more than ordinary disparagement, but engage in vile slander, and these should be the first to go. Disagree with a candidate’s policy, dislike their personality or their voice, wonder openly about their electability, all fair game in civil political discourse. But to insidiously suggest they are systematically and intentionally duping millions of good people, just to make a buck, is defamatory, and in Sarah’s case, against the evidence.

Such unfounded slander has no place in the conservative household, and especially no place on a site that touts itself as the beacon of conservatism on the web. Conservatism IT WAS A BIG MISTAKE THAT HAS COST HER POLITICALLY is grounded first of all in truth, and second of all in respect for the unalienable rights of our brothers and sisters made in the image of God, the foremost of which is the right to life. A close cousin to that right of life is the right protect one’s reputation from the caustic of life-destroying slander, hence the defamation laws. As conservatives, we all have a right to our opinions, but where our right to speak and another’s right to an honest reputation collide, we should observe that boundary and do as the Founders intended, govern ourselves, and our tongues, lest we prove unable to do so, and another come to govern us against our interest and our will.


68 posted on 08/25/2011 3:50:59 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

That’s what Karl Rove said, right before Palin slapped him down with the post on C4P about how nobody who says she is going to announce on a certain date have any idea what they are talking about.


69 posted on 08/25/2011 3:53:27 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
that there is something larger than herself at stake (beating Obama).

Wrong as usual. Beating obama is half the battle, her goal is to RESTORE America - that's what is at stake! So you know what to do with your something larger than herselfcomment.

I can’t even guess whether the announcement will be, “I’m in”, or “I’m out”.....Just my 2c

It's more like your mantra.
70 posted on 08/25/2011 3:53:59 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

The bolded text in my previous post was an inadvertent paste from another poster that got dropped in there by my droid. My apologies for any confusion.


71 posted on 08/25/2011 3:54:27 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: normy

After reading that truly nasty thread yesterday, I’ve come to the conclusion that a Perry supporter is not welcome on ANY Palin thread, even if they like her as well.


72 posted on 08/25/2011 3:55:48 PM PDT by Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Not bolded, uppercase. I’m going home now, tired, making mistakes, argh!


73 posted on 08/25/2011 3:56:54 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: don-o
Unless you believe she wants a second Obama term.

Well I certainly want a second Obama term!

About 30 years making big rocks into small rocks at Ft. Leavenworth would be about right.

74 posted on 08/25/2011 3:57:42 PM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Thanks! There are several on here that I am going to save as well.

All I have to say is

RUN SARAH, RUN!

http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c117/iyellatmytv/337742497.gif

75 posted on 08/25/2011 3:59:03 PM PDT by KC_Lion (If Sarah can't be elected in 2012, then Phase II will fall into place, may G-D have mercy on us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Recently Palin said she would support Romney if he were the Republican nominee, so it doesn't sound like she is thinking 3rd party.
76 posted on 08/25/2011 4:03:20 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

I didn’t say - and neither did Sarah - that she was going to announce SHE WAS running. She may announce she may NOT.

But she has said she will make an important announcement.

Sept. 3.

Why is that so hard for people to understand?


77 posted on 08/25/2011 4:04:06 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (The views and opinions expressed in this post are true and correct. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Texan

>> I’ve come to the conclusion that a Perry supporter is not welcome on ANY Palin thread, even if they like her as well.

That’s understandable, but be careful not to let the (relatively) few total jerks color your perception of the rest. Many Palin partisans (including, IMHO, JimRob) are not “Perry haters” at all; they just prefer Palin.

I’m in the same boat as you; of all the actual CANDIDATES, I favor Perry. But I really like Sarah Palin as well, and if she does jump in, I’ll reevaluate my position.

Meanwhile, this being an opinion forum, I’ll feel free to offer my opinion on whatever thread suits me — and do my level best to remain respectful. Again, *most* everyone seems to behave more-or-less with respect, bearing in mind that politics IS a “contact sport”. I’m not going to let the jerks that go overboard run me off.

FRegards


78 posted on 08/25/2011 4:06:22 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; presently no screen name

Of course she is not foolish at all. She is already on record at the Iowa state fair saying that no matter WHO wins the republican nomination, she will support them — ABO, Anybody But Obama is what she said.

That’s not the words of a person thinking about a 3rd-party run. It might be the words of a person certain that if they get in the race, they will win and won’t have to worry about voting for anybody else.

Of course, a couple of days ago she said “I doubt it”, when asked if she would announce on September 3rd. Doesn’t mean she won’t, but I’m not going to be dissappointed if she doesn’t, nor should anybody else.


79 posted on 08/25/2011 4:07:26 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: normy
I need the ground rules laid out here so I don't get the zot.


80 posted on 08/25/2011 4:08:56 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson