Why was this thread pulled? Because Bloomberg content can't be posted here - AM

yahoo ^ | 8/25/11 | Mike Doming

[the invisib1e hand]

altoonaherald.com altpressonline.com americanpolitics.com antiwar.com bloomberg.com brisbanetimes.com.au condenet.com eweek.com extremetech.com firstcoastnews.com gq.com independent.co.uk lowtechmagazine.com newyorker.com ohio.com pcmag.com portfolio.com prevention.com smh.com.au studlife.com stuff.co.nz style.com theage.com.au theonion.com thetowntalk.com tucsoncitizen.com universitystar.com vanityfair.com vogue.com wired.com Bump for future reference and to keep the full time staff charged with the responsibility of making sure their stuff doesn't get used busy. Ought to post those names randomly in replies to threads on here every day. Just post the website name. Search engines will find it and keep them buys.... :)

yep. and the longer that list grows, the less relevant this once-tremendous forum will become.

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

If I post something, you can bet I make sure it's true by checking 2-3 sources. WE can be the reporters of a LOT of information across this nation. And, I DONATE my time and skills to Free Republic. Can't give you my background because those trying to suppress the truth can cause those of us who don't have a multimillion dollar corporation guarding our backs are vulnerable.

WE ARE the underground newspaper/magazine/website of the United States of America. A lot of what those websites publish is pure propaganda designed to deceive the public.