Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Loudly Booed After Blaming US Foreign Policy for Terrorist Attacks [Video]
Breitbart TV ^ | September 12, 2011 at 6:46 pm - CNN | Ron Paul, Rick Santorum

Posted on 09/12/2011 10:08:48 PM PDT by Hunton Peck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: darkwing104

There’s a zot ping list???? Please sign me up!


121 posted on 09/13/2011 7:49:59 PM PDT by erod (Unlike the President I am a true Chicagoan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Hunton Peck

I keep on getting FReep mail from looney Paulistas. I think it is the same person who continually gets banned and comes back under different names. One was named “Guyfaukes”.


122 posted on 09/13/2011 8:34:20 PM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

Santorum is a man of principle.

In the next Republican debate, I hope that Ron Paul and Rick Perry will both be gone.

They are not conservatives in the true sense of the word.


123 posted on 09/13/2011 8:39:09 PM PDT by Palladin (Sarah: Are you gonna fish or cut bait?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Cymbaline

I can agree with you, but total war has not annihilated the Afghan people. Instead it’s killed our troops, or psychology injured many of them. Afghanistan is a cesspool. Those people do not want to move forward. I have read articles here on FR that noted your ally there this week, can be your enemy next week, and it extends all the way down the social ladder.

I don’t see the gain in a war like Afghanistan, unless we just nuke the floor of the country to glass, and then send in the marines to etch in ornamental memorials to the owners of the land, before it belonged to Islam. That’s the only total war I could see with any benefit in Afghanistan. I mean, what does America have to show for Afghanistan? Bin Laden was in Pakistan.

We removed a backwards government for a backwards people, so they could elect another backwards government who can’t hold off the previous backwards government.

I at first thought we could bring them into the modern age, but I feel that is just a impossible dream, unless we eradicated the entire population, and transplant other people there.

These people are not the Japanese... they have no interest in modernity at all. Unless its new ways to commit genocide, or take American lives.


124 posted on 09/13/2011 8:52:12 PM PDT by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: truthguy

But see, I disagree. We have all the tools needed to do what is needed to be done. Look at the level of our technology, compared to when we attacked Japan the first time in WW2, with the bombers we ended up sitting down in China, because we didn’t have the capability at the time to make the return trip.

At the time Bush attacked Afghanistan, I saw eye to eye with him. I thought we could dump the Taliban, and move those people into the modern age. Instead, see my reply just before this one... those people don’t want to be modern. They will always be backwards, and even worse, we caught OBL in Pakistan, not Afghanistan.


125 posted on 09/13/2011 9:03:44 PM PDT by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda

Awwwww, shucks! Thank you sir!


127 posted on 09/14/2011 1:33:49 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

Comment #128 Removed by Moderator

To: rbmillerjr

Exactly.


129 posted on 09/14/2011 5:02:04 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
"As a libertarian he is against neocon Wilsonian idealistic expansionism"

As long as you Paulhroids keep misrepresenting the Conservative stance on a strong defense, we will continue to blast to kingdom come each and every "blame America" statement from Ron Paul and his Paulhroids.

When I read statements from the Ron Paul drones, they are all over the map, some say he is Conservative, some like you say he is a Libertarian. I say he is neither.

Ron Paul is a neoConfederate!

130 posted on 09/14/2011 8:44:13 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield
I find it very creepy that election cycle after election cycle, Ron Paul drones vigorously endorse this lunatic as if they are grateful and fawning surfs who support their king. The founders detested this kind of idolatry of their fellow man.

Our nation was founded on principles derived from God, not man. Worship of Ron Paul by his drones remind me of the reason we left Old Europe long ago.

131 posted on 09/14/2011 8:48:09 AM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson