Ron Paul Loudly Booed After Blaming US Foreign Policy for Terrorist Attacks [Video]

Breitbart TV ^ | September 12, 2011 at 6:46 pm - CNN | Ron Paul, Rick Santorum

[SoldierDad]

Is it the blinders you are wearing, or the constant buryin of your head in the sand the keeps you from understanding what Islamo-facist want?

[SoldierDad]

I’m wondering if this individual isn’t R-U-N Paul himself!

[SoldierDad]

Well, darn. I wasn’t IBTZ apparently. Mr. AH-1S Pilot is no longer with us.

[Antoninus]

Pray tell Patrick, why did Al-Qaeda attack us?? Was it Maxim magazine or our “Freedom” that really pissed them off??

Because we are not Islamic and because we are perceived as weak. The same reason they have attacked and continue to attack non-Islamic societies all throughout history.

[jjm2111]

uhh... that should be “weren’t Muslim enough”.

[Arrowhead1952]

Posts by AH-1S Pilot

[Darksheare]

Sooo what is your solution then?
If we don’t face the terrorists over there, we will surely face them again here, and again, and again, and again.
What would you like to do then?
Bend over and be a good dhimmi for the muslims?
You go do that skippy.

[jjm2111]

I didn’t agree with AH-1S but the zotting was uncalled for, IMO.

[Darksheare]

Al-Qeada attacked us because we do not bow to Mecca.
The base tenet of islam is to spread the faith by the sword.
Are you truly THAT dense?
Have n’t you READ what they themselves say about islam?

[ex-snook]

"Basically, I am all for isolationism in terms of foreign policy. "

We have to come to grips as to whether the dangerous enemy to fear most is China, building her military power, or the Muslim nations whose military might consists of stolen planes, improvised devices and suicide bombers. Perpetual interventionism is the path to economic and military disaster. Ask England. Gingrich and Santorum are more nuts than Paul.

[Arrowhead1952]

I looked at the posting history and really didn’t see anything either. It may have been in the form of a threat in FReepmail.

[Darksheare]

Post 53 where he uses the leftard talking point that Al-Qeada attacked us NOT because they don’t like those who don’t bow to mecca and post 61’s line of “Its blow back from stupid misguided interventions” -THAT right there is total horse pucky, they attacked us in 1993, they attacked us and attacked us while we did NOTHING.
Finally they attacked us in 2001 and we [those who lead us] finally noticed.

[TheOldLady]

So long, AH-1S Pilot (Posting history)

Hat Tip to Arrowhead1952

Arrogant Ron Paul troll makes a lovely, flaming arc on its way to the trash can behind FR




Ron Paul is either a nut bucket or purely evil



FReepmail TheOldLady to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.

[Lady Jag]

PTSD?

[Arrowhead1952]

Might be part of the problem.

[jjm2111]

It is horse pucky; we’re in total agreement. But IMO being horse pucky on one issue even an important one doesn’t deserve a ZOT. Not for a vet who’s been around since 2004.

[Darksheare]

Vets know better than to sling those leftard talking points around.

[jjm2111]

Perhaps it was something along those lines; and in that case, warranted.

[jjm2111]

Some vets ARE leftists. I’ve met more than a handful over the years. I’m a vet myself (though not a leftist) :)

I think vets of any political stripe are worthy of some courtesy.

[Darksheare]

Not when they do the Murtha crap.