Posted on 09/15/2011 9:44:24 PM PDT by xjcsa
From Simon Conway's Facebook page:
"SOURCES CLOSE TO THE CAMP..... As predicted on my show nine days ago, Sarah Palin to announce for the Presidency tomorrow (Friday) - the day Constitution Day is observed. We'll be talking about it on 540 WFLA from 6am Eastern...."
Actually, nopardons has been characterizing your posts, using adjectives. It is you who are engaging in name-calling. Think Palinistas.
I hope that helps.
Thanks for the advice! Anymore questions? This has been a fun thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZmdhtjV8Fc
Linda Ronstadt - Los Laureles
FYI, if I'm remembering correctly, DRey is a Reina, not Rey. IOW, female.
Not that there's anything wrong with that! ;^)
Well let’s go then! Bring it!
I’m still just answering questions from nopardons. Did you have any new ones for me?
You see that? That's the sort of statement that causes so many people here to find you less than credible. You just have to get in a sideways dig at Palin, no matter what you say about her.
Not once have I ever seen you comment favorably about her many excellent speeches over the last six months, and every one of those speeches was foursquare in line with our nation's Founding Principles. Yet you claim to be a conservative.
"Behavior". What behavior are you referring to? Her going after the state-run media? Her going after Obama? Her twisting the media into pretzels, as they tried to keep up with her bus tour?
Perhaps it was her opposition to the boondoggle of the recent debt negotiations, and the abominable bill that finally passed. Or was it her visit to the Iowa State Fair, where she was swarmed wherever she went? Was it the interview she did with Hannity there? Perhaps you were turned off by some of the articles she wrote? You know, the ones that sounded exactly like Reagan talking?
Please, tell me what exactly turned you off about Palin in the last couple of months. I'm dying to hear this.
I don't see her as a "plaster saint", neither do I "worship" her, nor am I a "cultist".
I have taken stock of her, the announced candidates, and made a reasoned,logical comparison. It is upon these things that I base my opinion.
Here is the thing about the yellow pose of Texas (Perry). The only reason he was co-opted to run for president is because Palin had a strong following in Texas. The establishment needed someone to divide the conservative vote in Texas and Perry was the man for the job.
Conservatives need Texas, Florida, and a hand full of little states. The establishment knows that and that is why they asked their boy to run for President.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McsWKczU6wc
land down under ... men at work
Sadly, the prof somehow remembers the word “obtuse”, but has forgotten its meaning, if she ever really knew it and is now unable to use it correctly.
So all evening you’ve graced us with your trolldom to answer questions. Wow... better be careful with those question marks.
Oh God. I wish.
Agreed. Tomorrow seems a bit soon. I'd think more toward the end of the month or early October, but that's just me.
Yup. Laptop in my lap, watching my dvrs that I missed. I’m here when you need me. Just send me a ping.
Nopardons, seriously, you and Winifred need to get a dictionary.
Ohhhhhh! It’s an anti-Palin conspiracy?! I did not know that.
I actually like that song. It is the next best thing to Chamba Wamba’s “I Get Up Again.” I don’t know if that is actually the title, but if you know what I mean then you will know what I mean.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.